Guest guest Posted December 7, 2003 Report Share Posted December 7, 2003 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " wwoehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Dear JB, > > > > Why bother what way Judi or any other person will react ? What is > > that in you which bothers ? Couldn't it be your lovely self-image > > which won't get the attention and respect it is waiting for ? > > > > It needs two to tango - one who acts in a hurting way and the other > > who owns an according sensibility or hurtability, isn't it ? > > > > As long as you are protecting your self-image and keep it alive you > > will go on to be hurtable, on and on and on. Wouldn't it be better > to > > investigate what a self-image is and how to get rid of it, and when > > will you start to investigate. ? Tomorrow or next month or in three > > years, or isn't the best time to start when an actual hurt > happened, > > right now ? > > > > Werner > > Excellent feedback, Werner. > > This venue, involving words only, won't allow > one person to slap another, or even frown > negatively at another. > > Only words, ideas, symbols. > > Here's a venue to notice emotional responses > to ideas, image constructions related to words. > > A great way to inquire about the images one > forms, and the image one maintains of self which has > responses to those images. > > Other than the image I form from the words, there > are only marks appearing on a screen, marks passing > by ... ### Yes, so the advaita mind says, there are no humans here... JUST MARKS and images... Then STOP telling others (marks & images) to inquire into their images. If you do not, it is a definite sign of schizophrenia... on which 'marks' like jodyh thrive to their imaginary delight and compassion, to save other Images of non-existant humans who write only 'neutral words' which cannot hurt one (unless one has a non- existant image) but of which words, the mark/image Judih selects some more neutraly vicious than other neutral ones, although it is just an image they realate to and not a human she's trying to save with knife- stabbings which do not exist and which cannot hurt anyone, who is just an image. If so, take this lady as an example of your non- dualistic philosophy, sounds like quite a non-existant but quite deranged image trying to leave non-existant imaginary Marks, whi9ch no-one imagines. Wonderful! Thanks. Feel much better. Jb. PS. > > Everything else is my doing, and the doing which is me. ...... " my " ?! - anyone There?! ... 'doing?'. So no human, doing the 'doing'? But 'doing' doing the human, or the mark or the Image doing Image? Or non-doing doing nothing except the image which cannot do/hurt anything becuse it and no-thing exists... (Gee - I am getting just as good at this as Mr. Ramesh Balsekar..) > -- Dan Dan?! - Dan-who-what? Weird Image! To the Image. Doing the image. Hungry. I'll go & have supper. Will visit again nutty-house Inc, and write more tomorrow to no-one and other such Marks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.