Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Nisargadatta , " sk000005 " <sk000005> wrote: > > Well........I hate to say it.......but I'd like to see what would > > happen if Judi got her hands on Sheila. > > > Apropos Judi, she might be scratching herself too on the right > place! :-)) > > > sk I always heard that if you didn't stop touching it, you'd go blind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Nisargadatta , " sk000005 " <sk000005> wrote: > > You seem to know a lot about this " place " , wherever it is. > > Perhaps you would enlighten us... > > > > Bill > > > Laugh! Bill, concerning your last post...geeeee, what dirty fantasy > you have! > > We could ask Danananda, perhaps, he might enlighten us about > the " place " where he gets his " ananda " ! > > > anandanandanaaaaaaaa > sk Yeah. I kept touchin it. Now I needs glasses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Nisargadatta , " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > > Laugh! Bill, concerning your last post...geeeee, what dirty fantasy > > you have! > > > > We could ask Danananda, perhaps, he might enlighten us about > > the " place " where he gets his " ananda " ! > > > > > > anandanandanaaaaaaaa > > sk > > > you're on a roll sk. > think you have a little ananda of your own going there.... > > Bill Be aware of yo ananda, dawgs... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 > Nisargadatta , " sk000005 " <sk000005> wrote: > > > Well........I hate to say it.......but I'd like to see what would > > > happen if Judi got her hands on Sheila. > > > ******** Small potatoes, you guys are obviously smart enough to handle Sheila and her *ilk* on your own. Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Nisargadatta , " sk000005 " <sk000005> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " seesaw1us " <seesaw1us> > wrote: > > > What clowns! Where did you get the diplomas to spot illusion? > > That illusions can be sorted out, isn't that an illusion? > > Can you divide what is, that way? > > > > This message is for Sheila, > > > > Thank you sweetheart, although your posts are for spiritual pre- > > school, they seem to generate most of our post nowadays. So the > > jaded, the spiritually satieted, we thank you. > > > Very good, Pete! I agree with you. Some are scratching themselves > here, where others have the itch. Kind of cool, that she doesn't > react and besides, why should she? She is already scratching herself > on the right place. Laugh! > > > sk If she don't stop scratchin it, it'll never heal up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2004 Report Share Posted February 4, 2004 Thanks Pete, when you finally catch on that one only asks questions to which one already knows the answer to.. it all seems so pointless (why axe why). BTW, I really enjoyed your comments on comparing puberty with the " knowledge process " . Definately lotsa masturbation. Peace to you. Steve Nisargadatta , " seesaw1us " <seesaw1us> wrote: > Hey Steve, Thanks for the tip about . And congrats on your lack > of questions. > > > Nisargadatta , " yacobyisrael " > <yacobyisrael> wrote: > > Nicely put. > > > > Nisargadatta , " seesaw1us " <seesaw1us> > > wrote: > > > What clowns! Where did you get the diplomas to spot illusion? > > > That illusions can be sorted out, isn't that an illusion? > > > Can you divide what is, that way? > > > > > > This message is for Sheila, > > > > > > Thank you sweetheart, although your posts are for spiritual pre- > > > school, they seem to generate most of our post nowadays. So the > > > jaded, the spiritually satieted, we thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2003 " > > > <toombaru2003> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Perhaps we could rate messages on a illusion/word ratio! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are three illusions on the sentence above...... > > > > > > (and one implied) > > > > > How about this? > > > > > > > > > > It seems *to me* likely, if I may say so, that it would be > > > possible, > > > > > should we so choose, to rate messages as exchanged by people > > > > > (and I am referring to members,/participants here) on > > > > > this email list, on an illusion per word ratio. > > > > > > > > > > > There are three illusions on the sentence above...... > > > > > There is an illusion in the sentence above, as there is in > > this > > > > sentence. > > > > > > > > > > Here's another one for *you*: > > > > > > > > > > " This email list has messages. " > > > > > > > > > > How many illusions in that sentence? > > > > > > > > > > Two more: > > > > > > > > > > " This is a sentence. " > > > > > > > > > > " This sentence has no illusions. " > > > > > > > > > > How many illusions in each of the above? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nine (combined) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.