Guest guest Posted February 29, 2004 Report Share Posted February 29, 2004 Would Saint Francis Of Assisi had been considered enlightened or psychotic, today? Would Sankara had given his blessing to Nisargadatta's enlightenment? That the body and its desires were the enemy was a fashionable notion in Europe and India before the sixteen century. Food and sleep depravation were considered methods to obtain visions and divine revelations. Visions and voices were considered teaching tools and signs of divine approval. No Saint worth its salt would have do without them. But the mind can't choose its visions, so vision of the Devil were not uncommon, and this brought about more asceticism. Most of those saints would have been considered suicidal today. Supernatural powers and heroic virtues were expected as a result of such practices. It's a sign of our times that expectations for enlightenment are now more realistic. And yet, one of the main obstacles remain the idea that enlightenment has a set of definite qualities as immutable and verifiable as those of a good diamond. In reality Enlightenment might be as fashionable a notion as adulthood. In some countries and times a child of thirteen is considered mature enough to marry, in another an eighteen year old is considered mature enough to join the army and kill, but not mature enough to drink a beer. There is no universal standard. Delusion and enlightenment are only opinions and subject to change. Do you suffer? Are you connected? Does your mind feel like an old pair of sleepers? If the answer is yes, who cares what others think? No matter what it is, it will change. Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.