Eric - founder of Sandeepism. (extracted from Encyclopaedia Moronica)

[Guest guest]

No God, just shunya.

 

(the Buddha, 5th century B.C.)

 

 

 

 

God is dead.

 

(Fr. Nietsche, 19th century)

 

 

 

 

The Buddha said, I repeat: there is no God.

 

(Osho, 20th century)

 

 

 

 

God IS and His name is Sandeep!

 

(Eric, 21st century, )

 

 

 

 

 

(read on...)

 

 

 

 

 

-

" ericparoissien " <msrhood

<Nisargadatta >

Saturday, March 27, 2004 10:55 PM

Re: Ever heard of Cervantes? / sandeep / eric

 

 

> Nisargadatta , " seesaw1us " <seesaw1us>

> wrote:

>

> snip

>

> > Well, I think he'll do fine as moderator. Excellent choice, old

> chap.

> > He'll be comparing you to Ramesh in no time. Let me clarify

> > here that my dig at Eric's attempt to compare Sandy to Nis was my

> way

> > to defend Sandy's reputation. Eric's endorsement of anyone

> > realization is like the kiss of death. It's like a fast food

> > restaurant customer endorsing a five star chef. Plus citing the

> > opinions of hundreds was hilarious. Has he been conducting a poll?

> > No doubt we have here another Sarlo emuletor tossing teats around.

> LOL

>

> hi Pete,

> i haven't been notified about being a moderator???

> ok, let's make a simple/simplistic case on this one.

> point one:

> there seems to be a consensus about Sandeep,

> whenever he pops up, and wherever, people salute him,

> even recently on GR, he did not even show up but was

> praised for about a hundred messages, you saw it.

> point two:

> i agree with point one (of course i made it),

> without even knowing what people said

> i *thought*, well this guy is one in a million;

> the freshness in his posts, and totally unaffected.

> point three:

> Sandeep himself would not think of himself

> as having to envy anything to Nisargadatta

> which most people here do (except Pete and Dabo)

> like: " wow! the emptiness in Niz " or

> " wow! his relation to death " etc.

>

 

 

 

 

 

this is where you miss.

and when you miss, you miss all.

 

see, Eric...

this 'emptiness' and this 'relation to death'

are no simple matter.

 

not at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

> finally,

> none of the above points have any value,

> Pete we can't disagree on anything you and me.

> but the same can be said about Nisargadatta...

> no thinking, no witnessing, no feeling about him

> has any value at all,

> and not making a list for Nisargadatta.

> (Hur this is a great place, thank you)

> i just put this clear on a silver tray for dabo,

> if he thinks of Nisargadatta or Ramana or Buddha

> as somebodies, then he can start the same with Sandeep

>

> Eric

>

>

 

 

 

))

 

if only you had an idea how hilarious this is...

 

 

first.

the Buddha, Nisargadatta, Ramana are nobodies.

there is no person inside them.

this is why they are so special.

this is why they are so great.

 

moreover,

they have shared with people such WISDOM, LOVE, COMPASSION

that to compare them to an internet verbal masturbator is...

just not right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

second.

where is sandeep, the love of your internet life, now???

ok, i'll show you, you continue.....

 

SAAAAANDEEEEEEP!

SAAAAAAAAAAANDEEEEEEEEEEEEEP!

 

 

 

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

a true seeker wants to laugh all the time

 

dabo