no observer - no meaning

[Guest guest]

/AL wrote:

 

> " There is an observer and the observed. "

 

 

What about the One without a second … Advaita Vedanta?

 

Would it be right to say: an observer and the observed

exist before enlightenment

but `when overpowered by the wide expanse,

which is without beginning, end or middle,

there is the realisation of non-dual bliss'

to quote a favourite line of Ramana Maharshi.

 

 

> " Meaning is what appears as a feeling. "

 

Meaning is something we individually make up,

a concept to help us make sense of our lives.

Whether it appears as a feeling or as words makes no difference,

it is still duality.

 

 

By the way Anders

I admire your honesty and courage

to bare your soul to all of us.

 

All the very best for your homecoming

 

 

Bd2

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " billydid2 " <surinow@a...> wrote:

> /AL wrote:

>

> > " There is an observer and the observed. "

>

>

> What about the One without a second … Advaita Vedanta?

 

The observer and the observed are not two. :-)

 

>

> Would it be right to say: an observer and the observed

> exist before enlightenment

> but `when overpowered by the wide expanse,

> which is without beginning, end or middle,

> there is the realisation of non-dual bliss'

> to quote a favourite line of Ramana Maharshi.

>

>

> > " Meaning is what appears as a feeling. "

>

> Meaning is something we individually make up,

> a concept to help us make sense of our lives.

> Whether it appears as a feeling or as words makes no difference,

> it is still duality.

>

>

> By the way Anders

> I admire your honesty and courage

> to bare your soul to all of us.

>

> All the very best for your homecoming

 

Thanks

 

/AL

 

>

>

> Bd2