Guest guest Posted June 20, 2004 Report Share Posted June 20, 2004 To calculate with virtual universes besides or beyond our expanding " little one " is actually a common practice of quantum- phyisicists. The question about multiple universes or multiverses on a macroscopical level is purely speculative but, conceivable. There are a lot of quantic-states between 0 and 1, probably, a nearly endless catena of probabilities. All these worlds have perhaps a macroscopical correlative...exhausting all possible and impossible alternatives. An expanding universe is actually already a multiverse contemplated moment to moment. What we call reality is actually a convention which seems to work in transmitting DNA and with that DNA, consciousness (talking about consciousness in a conventional sense). The DNA and a DVD, where is the basic difference besides a certain grade of complexity? The question, if the universe expands or if it is consciousness, which expands, is always there and discussed controversially. If for a couple of billions of years some bacterias wouldn't have created what we call today atmosphere, we wouldn't be able to discuss about consciousness now. Isn't it a conformistic solution to say, all is consciousness...all is a projection, a DVD (DNA) playing a peculiar movie (consciousness) within a singular DVD-player (brain)? Do we create multiverses? At the moment we create or discover them, and we do that already, even formally for quantic calculations, the have been swallowed by " our universe " . The conventional notion of logic doesn't work anymore exhaustively in quantic calculations and yet there remains the notion of geometry and perhaps, gravitation, as " universe- independent factors " or common denominator, at least, in calculations concerning other " dimensions " or multiverses. Even holographic theories are, at the end, based on a notion of geometry...and finally, just a question of architecture. The tower of Babylon seems to be a suitable analogy. Is there a link, a copula between geometry and spirituality? Pyramids, cathedrals, mandalas, Buddhas parables (the middle path) and all kind of imaginable spiritual rethoric, artefacts and symbols are inherently geometrical following certain rules of proportionality, phi, pi and symmetry, for example among thousands of others. What are we worshiping else than what it represents? Geometry, and nothing else? Geometry, will never be reproducible inherently. Always changing but, intrinsically, always present, unchangeable and inmutable...no matter how many universes, dimensions or whatever there are. The link between geometry and Awareness is love in its widest definition. Geometry represents ultimately Love and Love, Awareness...ultimately inextricable, unfathomable and beyond understanding. The texture of geometry is emptiness... and going further interpreting Buddha's " emptiness is form, form is emptiness " , I would say today, " geometry is emptiness, emptiness is geometry " . Form and the absence of form is structered by geometry; Geometry, in it self, empty and also inextricably interwoven with consciousness. But, as geometry doesn't need consciousness it would be unthinkable, in contrast, to speak about consciousness without geometry. Awareness is as well the absence and presence of geometry...geometry is how love manifests, infinitely refillable...consciousness, the architect...and silence, the guard of all that dreams. sk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2004 Report Share Posted June 20, 2004 Nisargadatta , " sk000005 " <raav1@m...> wrote: > To calculate with virtual universes besides or beyond our > expanding " little one " is actually a common practice of quantum- > phyisicists. The question about multiple universes or multiverses on > a macroscopical level is purely speculative but, conceivable. There > are a lot of quantic-states between 0 and 1, probably, a nearly > endless catena of probabilities. All these worlds have perhaps a > macroscopical correlative...exhausting all possible and impossible > alternatives. An expanding universe is actually already a multiverse > contemplated moment to moment. What we call reality is actually a > convention which seems to work in transmitting DNA and with that > DNA, consciousness (talking about consciousness in a conventional > sense). The DNA and a DVD, where is the basic difference besides a > certain grade of complexity? The question, if the universe expands > or if it is consciousness, which expands, is always there and > discussed controversially. If for a couple of billions of years some > bacterias wouldn't have created what we call today atmosphere, we > wouldn't be able to discuss about consciousness now. Isn't it a > conformistic solution to say, all is consciousness...all is a > projection, a DVD (DNA) playing a peculiar movie (consciousness) > within a singular DVD-player (brain)? Do we create multiverses? At > the moment we create or discover them, and we do that already, even > formally for quantic calculations, the have been swallowed by " our > universe " . The conventional notion of logic doesn't work anymore > exhaustively in quantic calculations and yet there remains the > notion of geometry and perhaps, gravitation, as " universe- > independent factors " or common denominator, at least, in > calculations concerning other " dimensions " or multiverses. Even > holographic theories are, at the end, based on a notion of > geometry...and finally, just a question of architecture. The tower > of Babylon seems to be a suitable analogy. > > > Is there a link, a copula between geometry and spirituality? > Pyramids, cathedrals, mandalas, Buddhas parables (the middle path) > and all kind of imaginable spiritual rethoric, artefacts and symbols > are inherently geometrical following certain rules of > proportionality, phi, pi and symmetry, for example among thousands > of others. What are we worshiping else than what it represents? > Geometry, and nothing else? Geometry, will never be reproducible > inherently. Always changing but, intrinsically, always present, > unchangeable and inmutable...no matter how many universes, > dimensions or whatever there are. > > > The link between geometry and Awareness is love in its widest > definition. Geometry represents ultimately Love and Love, > Awareness...ultimately inextricable, unfathomable and beyond > understanding. The texture of geometry is emptiness... and going > further interpreting Buddha's " emptiness is form, form is > emptiness " , I would say today, " geometry is emptiness, emptiness is > geometry " . Form and the absence of form is structered by geometry; > Geometry, in it self, empty and also inextricably interwoven with > consciousness. But, as geometry doesn't need consciousness it would > be unthinkable, in contrast, to speak about consciousness without > geometry. > > > Awareness is as well the absence and presence of geometry...geometry > is how love manifests, infinitely refillable...consciousness, the > architect...and silence, the guard of all that dreams. > > > sk These is something absolute. All of existence seen as one " entity " is absolute. This allness cannot be measured because there is nothing in relation to it to make a measure possible. However, like you say, the absolute can contain an infinite number of possibilites, including our present universe. /AL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.