I think therefore I am.

[Guest guest]

Hi again,

 

> To say " I think, therefore I am " is a misconception>

 

 

Yes!

 

This is a very misleading and incorrect statement.

 

It is asserting what *binds* a ME to a ME.

 

It is always and ever a *me* that thinks, that *can* think; it 'takes

a me'.

 

Descartes statement says that ( because there is a ) thinking ME is (

proof of ) 'I AM'

 

The *thinking* is 'below' the '''existence'' > 'I AM' *and* this

existence is not *dependent* upon it ( thinking )

 

What it says is this;

 

I THINK ( i.e I am A ME ) / therefore I AM ( a ME )

 

 

Kind Regards,

 

Scott