Guest guest Posted August 15, 2004 Report Share Posted August 15, 2004 One of the objections to correspondence as a test of reality, is the believe that we can never know any object in itself. That thinking is always there tainting our perceptions, that even in seeing a rock, we can't detach the seeing from the recognition of it as a rock, and that recognition is a thought. So the world of matter must always remain out there untouched by our mind, and there can never be any unmixed correspondent between an image, and its object. This objection is based on the fallacy that a thought is something insubstantial. A thought is a material process in a brain. A thought is an exchange of neurotransmiters and electricity between neurons. A mind is a choreography of chemicals and occupies the same spatial dimension as a rock.. That the brain experiences its own workings as detached sensations doesn't divide the universe into two incompatible realms. All is one, all is matter/energy, and matter/energy is the unknown. Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.