Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Scott and Pete, will you play with me???

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi Scott my love,

 

Clarity please on your response:

 

>> " These questions only occur can only occur and can only be

*answered* by a reflected self ME.

>>

>>However in saying that, it is up to YOU to explore your personal

meaning of your own life, we cannot really ask another to derive our

own personal meaning for our own lives.

 

Donny: I've observed that we can't help but have other people

derive our own personal meaning for our own lives. They are

interwoven like the threads of a cloth and there really is no need

to ask, it shows up in the mirror weather we ask or not. We have the

ability to either see it and accept it or not see it, thereby

rejecting it.

 

 

>>But, life takes us by the hand every single moment of our lives

and teaches us, we have but to listen and not be so distorted by the

static ( that we create ) to miss the message.

 

Donny: Isn't that statement in conflict with your above

paragraph?

 

>>*Don't smudge the painting half way through if you are not happy

with the results so far*

 

Donny: isn't that just another agenda and objective of the

" thinking ( and bound ) ME. " What does it really matter if

the personsmudges the painting or not. Why not just throw the

painting out entirely? Isn't that another 'rule' set up by

the " bound/altered me " ?

Is it not the " bound me " that has the agenda for the

painting?

 

Maybe the one observing the picture doesn't really care one way

or the other – maybe it just waits to see what the " bound

me " is going to produce next, without any particular caring one

way

or the other.

 

:-)

:-)

:-)

 

 

Pete, my dear love,

although I don't care if Alberto uses 1 million smiley

faces on his messages, why should it matter? Doesn't an

obsession to have someone change their writing style to accommodate

my needs represent yet another control factor and a " bound

me " ? A

need to conform things to our own idea of what the picture should

look like, or how it should fit into our own ideas of comfort zone,

one in which we've decided works well and we would like all to

use

it?

 

 

 

Yes, we all seem to agree that we paint our own lives/realities

based on what our ideas our, and these individually combine to make

up a world society. And, at the very base of it there is nothing

but a blank canvas on which to paint. Perhaps I am just physically

playing out someone else's game, because they don't want to take on

the body, even if it is illusion. The game wouldn't play out quite

this way if there wasn't a " bound me " , an " altered me " . So, I

experience all these interest things? Why...because I can, and it's

something to do. Experiencing new and different things is like a

celestial t.v. sitcom, or sometimes a drama, or sometimes a comedy,

or sometimes a sci-fi movie, and sometimes a romance. One things for

sure, without a bound and altered 'me', there wouldn't be a show,

there wouldn't be a picture.

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

;)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

 

I love you dearly, and you have made me smile a thousand times.

I've tried crying, but it seems to get my face wet and makes my

nose run right over the place where I ingest the food. Not sure who

thought up the body design here, but we all seem to accept it.

 

:-)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:o (shock and awe)

 

I'm a bit of a pixie aren't I !!

ahaaa, and I carry a sturdy big stick too.

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

:)

 

 

Much love,

 

~*~ Donny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi again Donny,

 

 

>> " These questions only occur can only occur and can only be

*answered* by a reflected self ME.

>>

>>However in saying that, it is up to YOU to explore your personal

meaning of your own life, we cannot really ask another to derive our

own personal meaning for our own lives.

 

>>>>>Donny: I've observed that we can't help but have other people

derive our own personal meaning for our own lives. They are

interwoven like the threads of a cloth and there really is no need

to ask, it shows up in the mirror weather we ask or not. We have the

ability to either see it and accept it or not see it, thereby

rejecting it.>>>>

 

 

Yes, we listen to others we interact with others, and the world, we

learn, we listen to teachers and so on.

 

But it is only we that can develop our own meaning for our own lives.

 

The meaning that you derive from your life could be the result of any

of the above and could come from personal discovery or a combination

of both and so on, but it is you and you only that decides what part

you play and what is important to you and how you derive meaning

within yourself, no-one can tell you what you must do with your life,

you are the determiner of this.

 

 

 

>>But, life takes us by the hand every single moment of our lives

and teaches us, we have but to listen and not be so distorted by the

static ( that we create ) to miss the message.

 

>>>>Donny: Isn't that statement in conflict with your above

paragraph?>>>>

 

 

Part of life and part of deriving meaning is learning lessons.

 

If you don't *listen* to what life is saying you miss the cues and

repeat the same mistakes over and over again.

 

Part of learning the lesson is recognizing what is being taught.

 

 

 

>>*Don't smudge the painting half way through if you are not happy

with the results so far*

 

>>Donny: isn't that just another agenda and objective of the

" thinking ( and bound ) ME. " >>>

 

 

Yes, a ME exists up until the time of the physical death ( not

including reincarnation ) unless you plan on vanishing in a puff of

smoke ;)

 

This applies to all of us, every reflected self ME up until the

physical death determines the value and meaning of their own

life in ways unique to themselves and it is only they that can do

this.

 

 

>>>>What does it really matter if

the personsmudges the painting or not. Why not just throw the

painting out entirely? Isn't that another 'rule' set up by

the " bound/altered me " ?Is it not the " bound me " that has the agenda

for the

painting?

Maybe the one observing the picture doesn't really care one way

or the other Emaybe it just waits to see what the " bound

me " is going to produce next, without any particular caring one

way

or the other.>>>>

 

 

The painting is *your own life*, and how you live it determines

whether it is 'smudged'.

 

*You* are the painting that I was referring to and *you* are the

painter, make it a beautiful one.

 

 

Kind Regards,

 

Scott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...