Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Question

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I have just finished " I am That. " I have a question. When

Nisaragadatta says that consciousness is not reborn as

consciousness, he appears to be denying reincarnation. But, does

Nisaragadatta reject " rebirth " in the Buddhist tradition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

>

>

> I have just finished " I am That. " I have a question. When

> Nisaragadatta says that consciousness is not reborn as

> consciousness, he appears to be denying reincarnation. But, does

> Nisaragadatta reject " rebirth " in the Buddhist tradition?

 

 

What do you suppose that he means when he refers to the individual as: " The

child of a barren woman " ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

> >

> >

> > I have just finished " I am That. " I have a question. When

> > Nisaragadatta says that consciousness is not reborn as

> > consciousness, he appears to be denying reincarnation. But, does

> > Nisaragadatta reject " rebirth " in the Buddhist tradition?

>

>

> What do you suppose that he means when he refers to the individual

as: " The child of a barren woman " ?

 

Barren means not producing offspring. Do you believe the Mother of

All produces offspring? She _is_ the All. See?

 

/AL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Elias,

 

As far as I remember in his earlier years Niz semmed to have believed

in reincarnation but in his later years he absolutely denied it.

 

But let me ask you, why is this question so important for you ? As I

understood Niz, the main theme was to find the " I Am " and then to

transcend it and the question of rebirth had not weight and value at

all.

 

Werner

 

 

Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

>

>

> I have just finished " I am That. " I have a question. When

> Nisaragadatta says that consciousness is not reborn as

> consciousness, he appears to be denying reincarnation. But, does

> Nisaragadatta reject " rebirth " in the Buddhist tradition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " anders_lindman " <anders_lindman>

wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I have just finished " I am That. " I have a question. When

> > > > Nisaragadatta says that consciousness is not reborn as

> > > > consciousness, he appears to be denying reincarnation. But, does

> > > > Nisaragadatta reject " rebirth " in the Buddhist tradition?

> > >

> > >

> > > What do you suppose that he means when he refers to the individual

> > as: " The child of a barren woman " ?

> >

> > Barren means not producing offspring. Do you believe the Mother of

> > All produces offspring? She _is_ the All. See?

> >

> > /AL

>

>

>

 

" You " .......as the child of a barren woman.......were never born.......the

question of

rebirth......has no practical significance.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not maintain all the references, but there were several times

when he did mention being reborn. I am not going to go back to find

them.

 

<But let me ask you, why is this question so important for you ?>

 

Nisaragadatta says to question everything, to discover the false.

That is all I am doing, questioning.

 

My interest in part is academic. But it is also practical. I have

Buddhist friends who believe in rebirth, which is different from

reincarnation. I could determine from " I am That " that

Nisaragadatta denied the concept of reincarnation. But, one can

deny that, and still accept rebirth. My question makes that

distinction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

>

>

> I did not maintain all the references, but there were several times

> when he did mention being reborn. I am not going to go back to find

> them.

>

> <But let me ask you, why is this question so important for you ?>

>

> Nisaragadatta says to question everything, to discover the false.

> That is all I am doing, questioning.

>

> My interest in part is academic. But it is also practical. I have

> Buddhist friends who believe in rebirth, which is different from

> reincarnation. I could determine from " I am That " that

> Nisaragadatta denied the concept of reincarnation. But, one can

> deny that, and still accept rebirth. My question makes that

> distinction.

 

 

 

Within the the concept of rebirth or reincarnation.....is the tacit acceptance

of something

or someone that is in possession of a separate...autonomous,,,existential

reality....that is

not only born.....but then reborn......

 

 

This illusion of " self " emerges mysteriously and concurrently with its own dream

bubble.........dances for a while..........and ....once its alloted time has

expired....disappears

back into the emptiness.......never to be seen again........

 

 

Why it would want to live forever.......is a mystery..........

 

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Elias,

 

What I am still reflecting is why did you ask this question you

entered this list with ? Why are you interested what Niz is telling

about rebirth, what is your real motivation for it ?

 

Couldn't it be that in some way you fear getting alienated from your

Buddhist friends when feeling attracted to Niz and he rejects the

idea of rebirth ? Which means you fear to be left alone, you fear to

have to stand on your own feet to find out which is much more arduous

than just leaning on some friends and sharing their beliefs.

 

Werner

 

 

Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

>

>

> I did not maintain all the references, but there were several times

> when he did mention being reborn. I am not going to go back to

find

> them.

>

> <But let me ask you, why is this question so important for you ?>

>

> Nisaragadatta says to question everything, to discover the false.

> That is all I am doing, questioning.

>

> My interest in part is academic. But it is also practical. I have

> Buddhist friends who believe in rebirth, which is different from

> reincarnation. I could determine from " I am That " that

> Nisaragadatta denied the concept of reincarnation. But, one can

> deny that, and still accept rebirth. My question makes that

> distinction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...>

wrote:

>

> Dear Elias,

>

> What I am still reflecting is why did you ask this question you

> entered this list with ? Why are you interested what Niz is telling

> about rebirth, what is your real motivation for it ?

>

> Couldn't it be that in some way you fear getting alienated from your

> Buddhist friends when feeling attracted to Niz and he rejects the

> idea of rebirth ? Which means you fear to be left alone, you fear to

> have to stand on your own feet to find out which is much more arduous

> than just leaning on some friends and sharing their beliefs.

>

> Werner

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

That which motivates you to inquire....is nothing other then the

infinite-chain-of-

causation......It is THAT which is inquiring.....and THAT which is

answering.......sometimes it misleads ITS self...........

 

 

 

.........isn't THAT a kick in the ass?

 

 

toombaru

 

 

 

> Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

> >

> >

> > I did not maintain all the references, but there were several times

> > when he did mention being reborn. I am not going to go back to

> find

> > them.

> >

> > <But let me ask you, why is this question so important for you ?>

> >

> > Nisaragadatta says to question everything, to discover the false.

> > That is all I am doing, questioning.

> >

> > My interest in part is academic. But it is also practical. I have

> > Buddhist friends who believe in rebirth, which is different from

> > reincarnation. I could determine from " I am That " that

> > Nisaragadatta denied the concept of reincarnation. But, one can

> > deny that, and still accept rebirth. My question makes that

> > distinction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, all I did was ask a simple question. I don't need advice or

analysis. I just asked a question. Don't go second guessing why I

am asking, because you don't know me.

 

There is a difference between reincarnation and rebirth. I know he

rejected reincarnation. Did he also reject rebirth? That is the

whole of my inquiry. If you have the answer, fine. If you don't,

fine. But, if you don't want to answer the question, or are unable

to answer the question, please don't bother to repeat Nis to me. I

get it. I am just asking what he believed. I am not taking a

position for or against anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

>

> Guys, all I did was ask a simple question. I don't need advice or

> analysis. I just asked a question. Don't go second guessing why I

> am asking, because you don't know me.

>

> There is a difference between reincarnation and rebirth. I know he

> rejected reincarnation. Did he also reject rebirth?

 

\

 

 

Yes.

 

 

 

 

 

That is the

> whole of my inquiry. If you have the answer, fine. If you don't,

> fine. But, if you don't want to answer the question, or are unable

> to answer the question, please don't bother to repeat Nis to me. I

> get it. I am just asking what he believed. I am not taking a

> position for or against anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...>

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

> >

> > Guys, all I did was ask a simple question. I don't need advice

or

> > analysis. I just asked a question. Don't go second guessing

why I

> > am asking, because you don't know me.

> >

> > There is a difference between reincarnation and rebirth. I know

he

> > rejected reincarnation. Did he also reject rebirth?

>

> \

>

>

> Yes.

 

Namaste,

 

All of these sages pay some validity to rebirth as long as one

thinks one is the body. It is only the tendencies and attributes

that reincarnate anway not the personality,,,,,,,and ultimately in

true reality there is no I you or the world..........ONS..Tony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , eliasfardo wrote:

> > >

> > > Guys, all I did was ask a simple question. I don't need advice

> or

> > > analysis. I just asked a question. Don't go second guessing

> why I

> > > am asking, because you don't know me.

> > >

> > > There is a difference between reincarnation and rebirth. I know

> he

> > > rejected reincarnation. Did he also reject rebirth?

> >

> > \

> >

> >

> > Yes.

>

> Namaste,

>

> All of these sages pay some validity to rebirth as long as one

> thinks one is the body. It is only the tendencies and attributes

> that reincarnate anway not the personality,,,,,,,and ultimately in

> true reality there is no I you or the world..........ONS..Tony.

 

 

 

 

Tony,

 

Could you tell us what tendencies and attributes are again?

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...