Guest guest Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 everything wrote: > " There is no separation......in the universe. >Everything is the cause of everything. >Everything is the effect of everything. " so there is nothing called intention? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Nisargadatta , " hemant bhai " <hemantbhai100@h...> wrote: > > everything wrote: > > > " There is no separation......in the universe. > > >Everything is the cause of everything. > > >Everything is the effect of everything. " > > so there is nothing called intention? ************************************************* Damme write heman! Guys stop smoking now and answer Hemant's question! Alberto, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Nisargadatta , " ilikezen2004 " <ilikezen2004> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " hemant bhai " > <hemantbhai100@h...> wrote: > > > > everything wrote: > > > > > " There is no separation......in the universe. > > > > >Everything is the cause of everything. > > > > >Everything is the effect of everything. " > > > > so there is nothing called intention? > > ************************************************* > > Damme write heman! > > Guys stop smoking now and answer Hemant's question! > > Alberto, Hi heman havent' talk to you yet! They all think or almost think they is nothing called intention. They all think they are robots! They choose nothing they are nothing etc. Alberto, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Nisargadatta , " hemant bhai " <hemantbhai100@h...> wrote: > > everything wrote: > > > " There is no separation......in the universe. > > >Everything is the cause of everything. > > >Everything is the effect of everything. " > > so there is nothing called intention? Surely there is: I will what I have to ... Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " hemant bhai " > <hemantbhai100@h...> wrote: > > > > everything wrote: > > > > > " There is no separation......in the universe. > > > > >Everything is the cause of everything. > > > > >Everything is the effect of everything. " > > > > so there is nothing called intention? > > Surely there is: I will what I have to ... > > Werner ********************************** Hi werner, Those guys are lucky you answered. So they can hide in their thoughts to plan the next reply. And of course they will say. It was not I. Am i just a machine! Alberto, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Hmm Alberto, It seems you haven't grasped what I wrote. You must know I am one of those guys you are waiting an answer from. Werner Nisargadatta , " ilikezen2004 " <ilikezen2004> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " hemant bhai " > > <hemantbhai100@h...> wrote: > > > > > > everything wrote: > > > > > > > " There is no separation......in the universe. > > > > > > >Everything is the cause of everything. > > > > > > >Everything is the effect of everything. " > > > > > > so there is nothing called intention? > > > > Surely there is: I will what I have to ... > > > > Werner > > ********************************** > > Hi werner, > > Those guys are lucky you answered. So they can hide in their > thoughts to plan the next reply. And of course they will say. It was > not I. Am i just a machine! > > Alberto, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > > Hmm Alberto, > > It seems you haven't grasped what I wrote. You must know I am one of > those guys you are waiting an answer from. > > Werner > *********************************************** You mean you are still looking for answers?? but, ?? But you wote this in one of your statement not so long ago: " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> Tue Oct 19, 2004 5:56 pm Re: New!! Hi James, This " I am " just means " I am, but not this and not that " . In other words it is without any attributes. It is very simple. It is your pure being stipped of any qualities you could name. And you cannot attach to the I am because you ARE that " I am " already. Werner Alberto: Werner, this is one of the best, clearest explaination about the I am state I've heard! yet, you tell me this was just a typical, intellectual reply!! You are not in the " I am " state? Man oh man! I'm gonna hang myself!!! (joke) My Lord Jesus, my Lord buddha, my lord krishna, Ramana kill those guys with your divine glance!!! So if I understand most of you If not all of you are just playing the " I know " stuff. Like little Kids!! My God!!! And as some people said as soon there is a serious question! The guys are gone!!! but right after they seem to know everything! Stop taking drugs guys!!! You dare stand up and talk with his heart not his ?%?%$#!@@#$ mind!! Alberto, P.S. Where are you Stefan, are you around and silent! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Nisargadatta , " hemant bhai " <hemantbhai100@h...> wrote: > > everything wrote: > > > " There is no separation......in the universe. > > >Everything is the cause of everything. > > >Everything is the effect of everything. " > > so there is nothing called intention? " Intention " requires an autonomous entity from which to arise. Within the infinite chain of causation.....there is only reaction..... a scintillating.....hall of reflections............spinning in the emptiness. t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Ok. ok Alberto, I got it that you are a funny guy, but now tell me what is your position ? Werner Nisargadatta , " ilikezen2004 " <ilikezen2004> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> > wrote: > > > > > > Hmm Alberto, > > > > It seems you haven't grasped what I wrote. You must know I am one > of > > those guys you are waiting an answer from. > > > > Werner > > *********************************************** > > You mean you are still looking for answers?? but, ?? > > But you wote this in one of your statement not so long ago: > > " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> > Tue Oct 19, 2004 5:56 pm > Re: New!! > > Hi James, > > This " I am " just means " I am, but not this and not that " . In other > words it is without any attributes. It is very simple. It is your > pure being stipped of any qualities you could name. > > And you cannot attach to the I am because you ARE that " I am " > already. > > Werner > > Alberto: Werner, this is one of the best, clearest explaination > about the I am state I've heard! yet, you tell me this was just a > typical, intellectual reply!! You are not in the " I am " state? > > Man oh man! I'm gonna hang myself!!! (joke) > > My Lord Jesus, my Lord buddha, my lord krishna, Ramana kill those > guys with your divine glance!!! > > So if I understand most of you If not all of you are just playing > the " I know " stuff. Like little Kids!! My God!!! And as some people > said as soon there is a serious question! The guys are gone!!! but > right after they seem to know everything! Stop taking drugs guys!!! > > You dare stand up and talk with his heart not his ?%?%$#!@@#$ mind!! > > Alberto, > > P.S. Where are you Stefan, are you around and silent! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Ok. ok Alberto, > > I got it that you are a funny guy, but now tell me what is your > position ? > > Werner > ************************************************************ Ok, fine! no problem! This is my position: and you describt my position very well! see below: " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> Tue Oct 19, 2004 5:56 pm Re: New!! Hi James, This " I am " just means " I am, but not this and not that " . In other words it is without any attributes. It is very simple. It is your pure being stipped of any qualities you could name. And you cannot attach to the I am because you ARE that " I am " already. Werner Alberto: this is my position. " I am " state. I'm not joking. Now, where is you position? Why are you not yet there? :0) Read yourself above? The toombaru man was there! " I am " state then he comes back to play with the old stuff. Mystic halls and mirrors etc. Alberto, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.