Guest guest Posted November 18, 2004 Report Share Posted November 18, 2004 hya dan, --- dan330033 <berkowd wrote: >> How can you be absolutely sure your body will die >> when you have not experienced that yourself??? [cut] > > /AL >You can define yourself however you want, if it >makes you happy. As indestructible, infinite, >whatever floats your boat. Or you can say your a >descendent from a long line of royalty, or possessed >by the archangel Gabriel. Whatever makes you happy. >Still, it's just you using flowery-sounding words to >create a happy image for yourself. > >Painting pictures with words that really can't do a >damn thing for you, except make you temporarily >satisfied with your ability to paint word pictures. > > -- Dan Welcome back from .....(the dead?) How's your (closed) forum going ? Sandeep's (closed) " Yearning " seems to have been shut down ...or did it self-destruct as in " mission impossible " . You're correct from a biased standpoint though. Dialectically speaking, words used effectively(what the bedi dude Nisargadatta calls - mantric, mahavakyas or pointers-) root out false or distorted concepts, finally discarding itself in the process...clarity revealed...the wordless source. Ask William " Words-worth " for a second opinion. -dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2004 Report Share Posted November 19, 2004 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Shawn " <shawnregan> wrote: > > > > > How can you be absolutely sure your body will die when you have > > not > > > experienced that yourself??? What many sages say may be true: the > > > world is in you, not you in the world. Maybe the human body is > > > indestructible and only a shape-shifting package of information > in > > an > > > infinite timeless matrix of awareness. Scientists say that the > > body is > > > made out of atoms, but also that atoms are neither particles nor > > > waves. See the confusion? Observation creates reality. Who is the > > > observer? > > > > Anders, > > > > I had a slight shift into that state yesterday. I had the best day > > on about a month and my mind was much more free than my condition > > has allowed for a while. It's amazing how one doesn't know that one > > is in a restrictuve box until the box is removed (perhaps for a > > bigger box) then the remembrance of the larger box comes and one is > > sad and happy at the same time for knowing what was lost which now > > is found but for how long. > > > > Shawn > > You only know the truth when you're not moving into a state, > nor out of a state. > > There's nothing to grasp here. > > Not because anything is negated, but because negation and > affirmation can't be applied. > > -- Dan Dan, Glad to see another familiar name from last year. I remember your words were always penetrating, when I could grasp them at least. I agree with what you say. If we watch our mind we can see that our actions, internal dialog, etc. are ego driven. What is at the other end the " nothing " the impersonal. You seem to be guiding us to the impersonal by negating the personal. Shawn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.