Guest guest Posted November 23, 2004 Report Share Posted November 23, 2004 Nice sparring with you once again, Dan. I maintain that " you " , the experiencing structure, are not present even during deep-sleep muchless present during the " fearful " event of " death " . As such it is pointless and ridiculus to speak of " experiencing " death. It will never become part of yours, mine or anyone else's experience.... What is there to evade if it cannot be experienced ? It might me more correct to state that others will experience the " death " of your body but certainly not " you " . It's a non-issue, as far as I'm concerned. One who truly understands this, not merely intellectually, abides *AS* the deathless. You on the other hand seem to have investigated this subject from your angle and formed a firm conviction; you will probably remain enclosed by your conclusions. ....Nothing can penetrate your defensive armour at the moment. So let's not labour the point, wasting each other time. Maybe we should continue this topic during another episode. One more point below... --- dan330033 <berkowd wrote: > You're distorting things, because you're taking > your ideational process as if it refers to facts. > > That concept doesn't have to be around for something > to be experienced. It's a linguistic concept. > So what? It doesn't have any power to keep > something from being experienced. Describe to me one single thing you experienced without thought, without concept, without words ? -dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.