Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

There is no movement Towards awakening / Dan

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 "

<lissbon2002>

> wrote:

 

 

> And it's this self who makes meaning of things that is

> to be inquired into -- when one is ready for inquiry.

 

 

There is no self and no-one ready for inquiry, just some thoughts or,

if you prefer: some letters on the computer screen.

 

 

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...> wrote:

 

 

> These words you presented may represent a process of which

> you're aware.

>

> But no one else is aware of this the way you are, directly.

 

> Once this is clear, inquiry goes into the nature of " immediacy. "

>

> What is this of which I alone am being aware, immediately,

> with no other involved in the being-aware?

>

> Indeed, it isn't even awareness, let alone something of which to

> be aware.

>

> It isn't things, or people, or time.

>

> There is, therefore, nothing born here and therefore

> nothing to die --

>

> All constituted things and beings have no part to play

> in this -- as this is not conceptualizable.

>

> This immediacy of no name, of neither me nor you,

> is the resolution of all human conflicts and problems.

>

> Simply because neither human selves, consciousnesses,

> nor things have any hold here.

>

> This is peace which has no name.

>

> There is no movement toward this, nor away from this.

>

> -- Dan

 

 

This is how it seems to you now, because this is the doctrine you

wish to believe.

The movie you're watching incorporates the image of no image, the

conceptualisation of not conceptualizable.

This is still the screen you see.

The best way to realize it, is to feel your ass sitting on the

chair ;-)

How does it feel? Not in words, but directly?

Where is the non conceptualizable when you don't think nor talk about

it?

Is your ass still there when the non nonceptualizable is not? ;-)

 

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002>

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...>

wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 "

> <lissbon2002>

> > wrote:

>

>

> > And it's this self who makes meaning of things that is

> > to be inquired into -- when one is ready for inquiry.

>

>

> There is no self and no-one ready for inquiry, just some thoughts

or,

> if you prefer: some letters on the computer screen.

>

>

> Len

 

Only if that's true in your first-hand experience, Len.

 

And your tendency to want to duel and have come-backs

belies that awareness.

 

-- Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002>

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...>

wrote:

>

>

> > These words you presented may represent a process of which

> > you're aware.

> >

> > But no one else is aware of this the way you are, directly.

>

> > Once this is clear, inquiry goes into the nature of " immediacy. "

> >

> > What is this of which I alone am being aware, immediately,

> > with no other involved in the being-aware?

> >

> > Indeed, it isn't even awareness, let alone something of which to

> > be aware.

> >

> > It isn't things, or people, or time.

> >

> > There is, therefore, nothing born here and therefore

> > nothing to die --

> >

> > All constituted things and beings have no part to play

> > in this -- as this is not conceptualizable.

> >

> > This immediacy of no name, of neither me nor you,

> > is the resolution of all human conflicts and problems.

> >

> > Simply because neither human selves, consciousnesses,

> > nor things have any hold here.

> >

> > This is peace which has no name.

> >

> > There is no movement toward this, nor away from this.

> >

> > -- Dan

>

>

> This is how it seems to you now, because this is the doctrine you

> wish to believe.

 

No, Len. You're utterly wrong about that.

 

But if it serves you to believe that, and maintain that

image, by all means, have at it.

 

> The movie you're watching incorporates the image of no image, the

> conceptualisation of not conceptualizable.

> This is still the screen you see.

 

Wrong again.

 

But if that image of me watching a movie suits you,

enjoy watching it. As long as you believe you

can. And as long as the image of you being able

to believe still makes sense to you.

 

> The best way to realize it, is to feel your ass sitting on the

> chair ;-)

> How does it feel? Not in words, but directly?

 

Again, wrong.

 

There is no " best way. "

 

But, enjoy your movie in which you know the best way,

as long as you can keep it going.

 

> Where is the non conceptualizable when you don't think nor talk

about

> it?

 

The whole idea of a " where " for the nonconceptualizable is

misguided.

 

> Is your ass still there when the non nonceptualizable is not? ;-)

 

Your word-games are quite mismanaged.

 

There is no " is " and " is not " for the nonconceptualizable.

 

But, feel free to listen to your ass on the chair

as it tells you something significant about

a nonconceptualizable that can be and not be.

 

Smiles to you, too,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...> wrote:

 

 

> > This is how it seems to you now, because this is the doctrine you

> > wish to believe.

>

> No, Len. You're utterly wrong about that.

>

> But if it serves you to believe that, and maintain that

> image, by all means, have at it.

>

> > The movie you're watching incorporates the image of no image, the

> > conceptualisation of not conceptualizable.

> > This is still the screen you see.

>

> Wrong again.

>

> But if that image of me watching a movie suits you,

> enjoy watching it. As long as you believe you

> can. And as long as the image of you being able

> to believe still makes sense to you.

 

 

 

 

***As long as your own words make any sense to yourself?

 

Len

PS: thanks for all good wishes, I'm overwhelmed by so much kindness.

 

 

 

 

 

> > The best way to realize it, is to feel your ass sitting on the

> > chair ;-)

> > How does it feel? Not in words, but directly?

>

> Again, wrong.

>

> There is no " best way. "

 

> But, enjoy your movie in which you know the best way,

> as long as you can keep it going.

>

> > Where is the non conceptualizable when you don't think nor talk

> about

> > it?

>

> The whole idea of a " where " for the nonconceptualizable is

> misguided.

>

> > Is your ass still there when the non nonceptualizable is not? ;-)

>

> Your word-games are quite mismanaged.

 

> There is no " is " and " is not " for the nonconceptualizable.

>

> But, feel free to listen to your ass on the chair

> as it tells you something significant about

> a nonconceptualizable that can be and not be.

>

> Smiles to you, too,

> Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 "

<lissbon2002>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <berkowd@u...>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 "

> > <lissbon2002>

> > > wrote:

> >

> >

> > > And it's this self who makes meaning of things that is

> > > to be inquired into -- when one is ready for inquiry.

> >

> >

> > There is no self and no-one ready for inquiry, just some thoughts

> or,

> > if you prefer: some letters on the computer screen.

> >

> >

> > Len

 

 

> Only if that's true in your first-hand experience, Len.

>

> And your tendency to want to duel and have come-backs

> belies that awareness.

>

> -- Dan

 

 

No, dear. The above " conditions " are just more thoughts, or, if you

prefer: letters on the screen. They seem tangible to you now, because

you wish to believe in them, in the same way as you wish to believe

in my " tendencies " .

My " tendencies " are your memory.

 

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...