pleeeease Pete, tell us who Lewis is?! i beg you (i'll pay the price)

[Guest guest]

LOL. Lewis, is the memory of what he wrote. The seeker thinks there is

such a thing as truth in the form of eternal knowledge to be had,

but all knowledge depends on memory, the pseudo entity who seeks,

is itself an illusion of memory, without memory we are not. Meaning itself,

the very notion, " I am that " has no meaning without memory.

And memory is physical ... and very perishable. What was I saying? )

 

But The question is, who, Lewis, think he is? Is he coming out of the guru

closet? What do you think? I, for one, accept every one as my teacher,

and need no special one. One is as good as the other, that which speaks

has no preference for any particular microphone.

 

Pete

 

 

 

> I......see......you

>

> ~freyja

 

 

Lewis: Do you see me as I am, indefinable, or in my guises and identities, in

the many songs I sing, in the many voices that speak? Am I clear to you

or do you see me as being messy in what I assume to be here to speak in

the ways that can be done? Am I transparent and clearly away from that

which I put on? Can you hear me through it all? Do I seem lost in an

identity or am I clear and free to you now? Is my voice without shade,

does it sing that unknown song you know well in the fibre of your being?

I see you looking out, calling and do you see me now looking into you as

you which I am?

 

Lewis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

<ericparoissien@g...> wrote:

>

> Lewis

> " Some of you may know me, but I am not what you may think. I assume

any

> identity as required. If I am here, I assume the identity of an arch

> deconstructionist. What I am is indefinable, but I assume as

required.

>

> If you wish to hear the voice and persona of the arch

> deconstructionist that I can assume, be forewarned, for there will

be

> no mercy whatsoever. There is no malice or ill intent, only

compassion

> in an iron fist. So tread here and face squarely all that is. "

>

> i'm terrified!

 

 

i'm amused.

 

this guy is funny.

 

 

watch out, Eric - he may deconstruct you with a single e-mail!

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 1/25/05 10:15:53 AM, ericparoissien writes:

 

 

> -- In Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote:

> > LOL. Lewis, is the memory of what he wrote. The seeker thinks there is

> > such a thing as truth in the form of eternal knowledge to be had,

> > but all knowledge depends on memory, the pseudo entity who seeks,

> > is itself an illusion of memory, without memory we are not. 

> Meaning itself,

> > the very notion, " I am that " has no meaning without memory.

> > And memory is physical ... and very perishable.   What   was I

> saying? )

> >

> > But The question is, who, Lewis, think he is? Is he coming out of

> the guru

> > closet? What do you think? I, for one, accept every one as my teacher,

> > and need no special one. One is as good as the other, that which speaks

> > has no preference for any particular microphone.

> >

> > Pete

>

> Eric: >I have too much germanic blood, to me people are who they are,>

>

P: Can you think of a more silly statement to make, or that was your best try

for the day?

>

> Eric: >some people

> on this list or others trusted me and been trusted with international

> transfer of money for bought

> >goods,

>

P: Oh! That was even more silly and irrelevant, sorry.

>

>

> E: > i don't

> >need to know everything ...

>

P: Hmm, that was even sillier. Don't worry you won't

>

>

> (what is Freyja's text doing here below?)

>

P: Sorry you didn't see the answer to your

question that Lewis was poetically

suggesting to Freyja.

 

>

> >

>

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote:

> LOL. Lewis, is the memory of what he wrote. The seeker thinks there is

> such a thing as truth in the form of eternal knowledge to be had,

> but all knowledge depends on memory, the pseudo entity who seeks,

> is itself an illusion of memory, without memory we are not.

Meaning itself,

> the very notion, " I am that " has no meaning without memory.

> And memory is physical ... and very perishable. What was I

saying? )

>

> But The question is, who, Lewis, think he is? Is he coming out of

the guru

> closet? What do you think? I, for one, accept every one as my teacher,

> and need no special one. One is as good as the other, that which speaks

> has no preference for any particular microphone.

>

> Pete

 

I have too much germanic blood, to me people are who they are, they

tell their name and what they do, and what they want and make

everything clear, i can't separate a real interaction with his persona

on the net, for example i have trusted (and been trusted) some people

on this list or others with international transfer of money for bought

goods, i'm not into the play of actors, i like the fun but i'm not

playing a video game where all people can be whacked or created as i go.

Still i can talk with a girl posing as a boy and vice-versa, i don't

need to know everything ...

(what is Freyja's text doing here below?)

 

>

>

>

> > I......see......you

> >

> > ~freyja

>

>

> Lewis: Do you see me as I am, indefinable, or in my guises and

identities, in

> the many songs I sing, in the many voices that speak? Am I clear to you

> or do you see me as being messy in what I assume to be here to speak in

> the ways that can be done? Am I transparent and clearly away from that

> which I put on? Can you hear me through it all? Do I seem lost in an

> identity or am I clear and free to you now? Is my voice without shade,

> does it sing that unknown song you know well in the fibre of your being?

> I see you looking out, calling and do you see me now looking into you as

> you which I am?

>

> Lewis

 

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " dabo_now " <dscasta> wrote:

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

> <ericparoissien@g...> wrote:

> >

> > Lewis

> > " Some of you may know me, but I am not what you may think. I assume

> any

> > identity as required. If I am here, I assume the identity of an arch

> > deconstructionist. What I am is indefinable, but I assume as

> required.

> >

> > If you wish to hear the voice and persona of the arch

> > deconstructionist that I can assume, be forewarned, for there will

> be

> > no mercy whatsoever. There is no malice or ill intent, only

> compassion

> > in an iron fist. So tread here and face squarely all that is. "

> >

> > i'm terrified!

>

>

> i'm amused.

>

> this guy is funny.

>

>

> watch out, Eric - he may deconstruct you with a single e-mail!

 

It was an excess, Lewis is not habitually like this, two days ago my

daughter (4years old) told me with a dark look: " i'm stronger than you

i'm gonna smash you! " ...

we have the archetype of the destructor invading us when chemistry is

diverted and overloads feeding back into the primal brains.

[Guest guest]

Eric Paroissien wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " dabo_now " <dscasta> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

> > <ericparoissien@g...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Lewis

> > > " Some of you may know me, but I am not what you may think. I assume

> > any

> > > identity as required. If I am here, I assume the identity of an arch

> > > deconstructionist. What I am is indefinable, but I assume as

> > required.

> > >

> > > If you wish to hear the voice and persona of the arch

> > > deconstructionist that I can assume, be forewarned, for there will

> > be

> > > no mercy whatsoever. There is no malice or ill intent, only

> > compassion

> > > in an iron fist. So tread here and face squarely all that is. "

> > >

> > > i'm terrified!

> >

> >

> > i'm amused.

> >

> > this guy is funny.

> >

> >

> > watch out, Eric - he may deconstruct you with a single e-mail!

>

> It was an excess, Lewis is not habitually like this, two days ago my

> daughter (4years old) told me with a dark look: " i'm stronger than you

> i'm gonna smash you! " ...

> we have the archetype of the destructor invading us when chemistry is

> diverted and overloads feeding back into the primal brains.

 

 

 

As the Arch Deconstructor, I am going to deconstruct you Eric, till your

bones rattle in your skin bag, till your teeth shake loose with your

trembling. What you thought was excess was only a dribbling of what is

to come for you. For, exposing the masked avenger, for revealing the

damnable plans, avenging must be done as you have said as it is always

done. With your words, you have invoked the Arch Deconstructor, who

shows no mercy and there is a fiery hell with a door that has your name

upon it where you will enter that blazing furnace and will pay what is

required. You never know when it will come upon you so realize the

inevitable for you will not be able to prepare for it, it comes without

your knowing.

 

Arch Deconstructor

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote:

>

> In a message dated 1/25/05 10:15:53 AM, ericparoissien@g... writes:

>

>

> > -- In Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote:

> > > LOL. Lewis, is the memory of what he wrote. The seeker thinks

there is

> > > such a thing as truth in the form of eternal knowledge to be

had,

> > > but all knowledge depends on memory, the pseudo entity who

seeks,

> > > is itself an illusion of memory, without memory we are not. 

> > Meaning itself,

> > > the very notion, " I am that " has no meaning without memory.

> > > And memory is physical ... and very perishable.   What   was I

> > saying? )

> > >

> > > But The question is, who, Lewis, think he is? Is he coming out

of

> > the guru

> > > closet?

 

 

 

guru closet, Pete?

So, now there's a closet for gurus?!

I thought those were only for skeletons.

 

 

 

<<What do you think? I, for one, accept every one as my teacher,

> > > and need no special one. One is as good as the other, that

which speaks

> > > has no preference for any particular microphone.

> > >

 

 

that's right, whatever is right in front of you.

 

 

f.

 

 

>

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Lewis Burgess <lbb10@c...> wrote:

 

....

 

>

> As the Arch Deconstructor, I am going to deconstruct you Eric, till

your

> bones rattle in your skin bag, till your teeth shake loose with your

> trembling. What you thought was excess was only a dribbling of what is

> to come for you. For, exposing the masked avenger, for revealing the

> damnable plans, avenging must be done as you have said as it is always

> done. With your words, you have invoked the Arch Deconstructor, who

> shows no mercy and there is a fiery hell with a door that has your name

> upon it where you will enter that blazing furnace and will pay what is

> required. You never know when it will come upon you so realize the

> inevitable for you will not be able to prepare for it, it comes without

> your knowing.

>

> Arch Deconstructor

 

In my experience it takes a keen interest into someone to be able to

try what you say above... some intimacy with his core knot, some

identity even.

[Guest guest]

Eric Paroissien wrote:

 

>

> Nisargadatta , Lewis Burgess <lbb10@c...> wrote:

>

> ...

>

> >

> > As the Arch Deconstructor, I am going to deconstruct you Eric, till

> your

> > bones rattle in your skin bag, till your teeth shake loose with your

> > trembling. What you thought was excess was only a dribbling of what is

> > to come for you. For, exposing the masked avenger, for revealing the

> > damnable plans, avenging must be done as you have said as it is always

> > done. With your words, you have invoked the Arch Deconstructor, who

> > shows no mercy and there is a fiery hell with a door that has your name

> > upon it where you will enter that blazing furnace and will pay what is

> > required. You never know when it will come upon you so realize the

> > inevitable for you will not be able to prepare for it, it comes without

> > your knowing.

> >

> > Arch Deconstructor

>

> In my experience it takes a keen interest into someone to be able to

> try what you say above... some intimacy with his core knot, some

> identity even.

 

 

It is as you say, identity, but not in the way imagined. Arch

Deconstruction already proceeds apace. As it is beyond ordinary thinking

and so you need not prepare or have concern for all is known in every

way, all the secrets and fears and defenses are being worked on so turn

away. You invoked it and it will be done.

 

Arch Deconstructor

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Lewis Burgess <lbb10@c...> wrote:

>

>

> Eric Paroissien wrote:

>

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Lewis Burgess <lbb10@c...> wrote:

> >

> > ...

> >

> > >

> > > As the Arch Deconstructor, I am going to deconstruct you Eric, till

> > your

> > > bones rattle in your skin bag, till your teeth shake loose with

your

> > > trembling. What you thought was excess was only a dribbling of

what is

> > > to come for you. For, exposing the masked avenger, for

revealing the

> > > damnable plans, avenging must be done as you have said as it is

always

> > > done. With your words, you have invoked the Arch Deconstructor, who

> > > shows no mercy and there is a fiery hell with a door that has

your name

> > > upon it where you will enter that blazing furnace and will pay

what is

> > > required. You never know when it will come upon you so realize the

> > > inevitable for you will not be able to prepare for it, it comes

without

> > > your knowing.

> > >

> > > Arch Deconstructor

> >

> > In my experience it takes a keen interest into someone to be able to

> > try what you say above... some intimacy with his core knot, some

> > identity even.

>

>

> It is as you say, identity, but not in the way imagined. Arch

> Deconstruction already proceeds apace. As it is beyond ordinary

thinking

> and so you need not prepare or have concern for all is known in every

> way, all the secrets and fears and defenses are being worked on so turn

> away. You invoked it and it will be done.

>

> Arch Deconstructor

 

I wrote my mail, i had a first coffee, the archdeconstructor at 6:30,

then a light breakfast, the first kid wakes up, you know ... the

usual, what is a human life made of.