Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > .....is THAT. > > > > <Yawn> > > > > What is this nonsense, AC? > > > > Joe > > Exactly " what " is Nonsense, Here, Joe. Oh, nothing, I'm just in a mood to stir shit up. :-) > > What it should have been? " I love eggs. " > > > With warm regards, > ac. Warmth back at you, Uncle Huevo (an actual nickname for me) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " <adithya_comming> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > I AM > > > > > > ...is that a belief, dear Toom? > > > > Yes, it is. > > NO. > > It is Not. It obviously is. > > > > And a misunderstanding as well. > > NO. Otherwise, why the need to say NO? > > Discover where it has nothing to say > > to itself about itself, where it is > > not an it, and no am nor where is involved. > > I AM Just a passing thought configuration -- nothing more. Nothing to get hung about :-) > .....is THAT. No is for that or THAT or even *this* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > > > ...is that a belief, dear Toom? > > > > > > Yes, it is. > > > > NO. > > > > It is Not. > > It obviously is. > > > > > > > And a misunderstanding as well. > > > > NO. > > Otherwise, why the need to say NO? Quite Simple. When, someone says ..Arvind is a woman. I say, ...NO. BTW, WHY you 'need' to contest it ? > > > > Discover where it has nothing to say > > > to itself about itself, where it is > > > not an it, and no am nor where is involved. > > > > I AM > > Just a passing thought configuration -- nothing more. It is .... NOT ....a Thought ! > Nothing to get hung about :-) NOT a Possiblity of ...THAT ...happening ! > > > .....is THAT. > > No is for that or THAT or even *this* The idea of *this* is definitely ...NOT ...to be `hung' with. It is just the brain watching its ...empty ...thought space, ...Nothing More. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " <adithya_comming> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > > > > > ...is that a belief, dear Toom? > > > > > > > > Yes, it is. > > > > > > NO. > > > > > > It is Not. > > > > It obviously is. > > > > > > > > > > And a misunderstanding as well. > > > > > > NO. > > > > Otherwise, why the need to say NO? > > Quite Simple. > > When, someone says ..Arvind is a woman. > > I say, ...NO. > > > BTW, WHY you 'need' to contest it ? Clearly then, you are defending a belief that it seems important to you to defend. > > > > Discover where it has nothing to say > > > > to itself about itself, where it is > > > > not an it, and no am nor where is involved. > > > > > > I AM > > > > Just a passing thought configuration -- nothing more. > > It is .... NOT ....a Thought ! It sure is. Otherwise, it would have no verbal meaning. > > Nothing to get hung about :-) > > NOT a Possiblity of ...THAT ...happening ! It will pass. > > > .....is THAT. > > > > No is for that or THAT or even *this* > > The idea of *this* is definitely ...NOT ...to be `hung' with. > > It is just the brain watching its ...empty ...thought > space, ...Nothing More. The brain is an object. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " > <dan330033> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > > > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > > > > > > > ...is that a belief, dear Toom? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it is. > > > > > > > > NO. > > > > > > > > It is Not. > > > > > > It obviously is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a misunderstanding as well. > > > > > > > > NO. > > > > > > Otherwise, why the need to say NO? > > > > Quite Simple. > > > > When, someone says ..Arvind is a woman. > > > > I say, ...NO. > > > > > > BTW, WHY you 'need' to contest it ? > > Clearly then, you are defending a belief that it seems > important to you to defend. > > > > > > Discover where it has nothing to say > > > > > to itself about itself, where it is > > > > > not an it, and no am nor where is involved. > > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > Just a passing thought configuration -- nothing more. > > > > It is .... NOT ....a Thought ! > > It sure is. Otherwise, it would have no verbal meaning. Who said anything about about ...having Verbal meaning or Not. It is ---- EXISTING ---- ----- BEING ----- ----- I AM ------ > > > > Nothing to get hung about :-) > > > > NOT a Possiblity of ...THAT ...happening ! > > It will pass. NO. What Pases, ...is NOT it ! > > > > > .....is THAT. > > > > > > No is for that or THAT or even *this* > > > > The idea of *this* is definitely ...NOT ...to be `hung' with. > > > > It is just the brain watching its ...empty ...thought > > space, ...Nothing More. > > The brain is an object. So, is the ...empty thought-space ...confused as some Ultimate Reality called *this*. > > -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2005 Report Share Posted February 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " <adithya_comming> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " > > <dan330033> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming " > > > > > > <adithya_comming> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...is that a belief, dear Toom? > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it is. > > > > > > > > > > NO. > > > > > > > > > > It is Not. > > > > > > > > It obviously is. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And a misunderstanding as well. > > > > > > > > > > NO. > > > > > > > > Otherwise, why the need to say NO? > > > > > > Quite Simple. > > > > > > When, someone says ..Arvind is a woman. > > > > > > I say, ...NO. > > > > > > > > > BTW, WHY you 'need' to contest it ? > > > > Clearly then, you are defending a belief that it seems > > important to you to defend. > > > > > > > > Discover where it has nothing to say > > > > > > to itself about itself, where it is > > > > > > not an it, and no am nor where is involved. > > > > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > > > Just a passing thought configuration -- nothing more. > > > > > > It is .... NOT ....a Thought ! > > > > It sure is. Otherwise, it would have no verbal meaning. > > Who said anything about about ...having Verbal meaning or Not. > > It is ---- EXISTING ---- > > > ----- BEING ----- > > ----- I AM ------ Sorry, I thought it would be simple enough for you to realize that you are using words that have verbal meaning. My mistake! :-) -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2005 Report Share Posted February 3, 2005 > > > > > > > > > > > > I AM > > > > > > > > > > Just a passing thought configuration -- nothing more. > > > > > > > > It is .... NOT ....a Thought ! > > > > > > It sure is. Otherwise, it would have no verbal meaning. > > > > Who said anything about about ...having Verbal meaning or Not. > > > > It is ---- EXISTING ---- > > > > > > ----- BEING ----- > > > > ----- I AM ------ > > Sorry, I thought it would be simple enough for you to realize > that you are using words that have verbal meaning. What other than `words' I can use on a " text-based " forum ? Should I use the words that have NO Verbal Meaning ? What purpose, that would serve ...? BTW, what meaning ---- I AM ---- has for you? regards, ac. > > My mistake! > > :-) > > -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.