Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Lewis' Lack of Brain

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Pedsie2 wrote:

> L: >Are you mad Pete? Are you a lunatic?

>

> :) Guilty, on both counts, but never fear. I enjoy

> being that way. I get tick when people try to sell me a

> goat for a cow. What you said below in quotations is

> a gross distortion of Lorber’s case study:

>

> L: “Perhaps you read about a

> college student (and now others) years ago who had no detectable brain.

> This student just had a thin lining of cerebral cells about 1 millimeter

> thick due to hydrocephalus and he functioned as well as everyone else,

> graduating college with honors in mathematics. This student and about

> 600 men and women who had little or almost no brain.â€

>

> P: Lets say you misunderstood, and are not trying to

> foist a falsehood, but the fact is these people had

> a compressed cerebrum, which is not the whole

> brain, but the outermost layer 4 or 5 mm.,

> commonly referred as gray matter. That in these

> individuals the cells where compressed to a thickness

> of 1 millimeter doesn't mean this people had hardly

> any brain matter. That only proves the great plasticity

> of the brain. Lewis, all sort of university professors make

> wacky claims all the time. None of that should be believed

> until widely accepted by the scientific community.

 

 

Not a distortion in any way. That is how he presented it. And brain

matter, gray matter was reduced Pete in some cases severely and not just

compressed. And the point you mention is the point made by Lorber. These

cases point to greater plasticity and non-specialized brain areas and

discrete areas of the brain may not be necessary or exist as thought of

currently. Could it be that what is necessary for normal activities is

much much less than imagined? Full brain activity and what that entails

in terms of brain area specialization, especially of the cerebral cortex

is questioned. Nothing proved, just questioned. A lot of questions are

raised by Lorber's study with those for and against and none are

answered so what falsehood was spread? No detectable brain? A brain 4 to

5 times less than normal and even more in some cases? If you were shown

these compressed brain cells where the ventricles where expanded with

cerebrospinal fluid next to a brain of normal size and normal ventricles

would you recognize it as a brain? Perhaps it is overstated for that

dramatic punch but it is not false as Lorber points out. Have you read

the relevant three page report from Science? I can send it you. It is a

pdf file 922000 bytes in size. I can send it to your e-mail address if

it not too large. Let me know.

 

 

>

> Do you teach, Lewis? Do you do research? What do

> you do for a living? Have you published any books, papers?

> Are your professional opinions respected by your peers?

 

Yes. Yes. Research Associate. No. By some.

 

Lewis

 

PS. The lunatic interview was superb. Sounds like me. Oh my, should I

have said that :-O Of course, I am a FUNCTIONAL SENILE LUNATIC COSMIC

NARCISSIST SPREADING INSANITY. Yes. That is delicious. You figured it

out. Now all you have to do is read it over and over and to get to

understanding it. Note: The unconscious should not be substituted for

darkness; they are not equivalent and I do not experience

unconsciousness, who does? The rest will make sense (me/you etc.) and be

modified as time goes. Otherwise, excellent work. Thanks, Pete! We

madmen must be jacketed together!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 2/20/05 1:10:49 AM, lbb10 writes:

 

 

> Do you teach, Lewis? Do you do research? What do

> > you do for a living? Have you published any books, papers?

> > Are your professional opinions respected by your peers?

>

> Yes. Yes. Research Associate. No. By some.

>

> Lewis

>

>

 

P: What kind of reaserch do you do, Lewis?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 2/20/05 8:13:22 AM, lbb10 writes:

 

 

> P: What   kind of reaserch do you do, Lewis?

>

>

> >Social anthropological.

>

P: Quite a laconic answer for Lewis! :)

 

Let me help loosing your tongue/fingers.

 

social anthropology:

the branch of anthropology that deals with

the social customs, beliefs, and practices

of man.

 

So whose of customs, beliefs, and

practices are you studying now?

>

>

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 2/20/05 10:24:14 AM, lbb10 writes:

 

 

> >All of us are waiting for the end of it which began in 1955. There is

> not much to do because of this. Whatever will happen will be done by

> December 2005. By that time or before, All will be taking a hike. The

> >generosity of the board allows us a sort of unspoken severance pay

> without much programmed work as we everything we did before winds down

> to a halt. Hence, I have time on my hands. As far as new work is

> >concerned remember one of the quotes I sent you that has to do with such

> things. :-)

>

> Lewis

>

 

Sorry to hear, and good luck with your job search.

If you haven't found a job by the time the

paycheck stops, don't forget to file for

unemployment compensation. I used to

investigate fraud for the agency, plus

supervised a unit of quality control

investigators, so maybe I could be of help, if you

have questions, or problems, don't hesitate to

ask me privately.

 

Best to you,

Pete

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedsie2 wrote:

>

> In a message dated 2/20/05 1:10:49 AM, lbb10 writes:

>

>

>

>>Do you teach, Lewis? Do you do research? What do

>>

>>>you do for a living? Have you published any books, papers?

>>>Are your professional opinions respected by your peers?

>>

>>Yes. Yes. Research Associate. No. By some.

>>

>>Lewis

>>

>>

>

>

> P: What kind of reaserch do you do, Lewis?

 

 

Social anthropological.

 

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedsie2 wrote:

 

>

> In a message dated 2/20/05 8:13:22 AM, lbb10 writes:

>

>

>

>>P: What kind of reaserch do you do, Lewis?

>>

>>

>>

>>>Social anthropological.

>>

> P: Quite a laconic answer for Lewis! :)

>

> Let me help loosing your tongue/fingers.

>

> social anthropology:

> the branch of anthropology that deals with

> the social customs, beliefs, and practices

> of man.

>

> So whose of customs, beliefs, and

> practices are you studying now?

 

At the moment, besides my own and among the other mundane things done at

work, I am working with a presenting a fellow social anthropologist's

work on the WWW. Her name is Anne MacKaye Chapman and is a dear friend

and colleague. She worked with the Yamana and Selk'nam in Tierra del

Fuego and the Tolupan and Lenca in Honduras. We are creating together a

web site for her as a fellow of the institute where I work. She has been

associated with the institute for over 40 years and the web site will

help with getting her new 323,000 word work on the encounters of Charles

Darwin and others of his time with the peoples of Tierra del Fuego,

published. I pushed the idea on the institute and they agreed and I can

be busy with something. The web site will be up in a month or so. Anne

is in Honduras now and will back March 1st.

 

The institute is being reorganized into something else and it will no

longer function as it did it the past, if it will exist at all. The

unique library, the only one of its kind in the world is being donated

to New York University at this time, with one book, monograph, journal

title at time being accessioned by NYU staff on the fifth floor of the

building.

 

All of us are waiting for the end of it which began in 1955. There is

not much to do because of this. Whatever will happen will be done by

December 2005. By that time or before, All will be taking a hike. The

generosity of the board allows us a sort of unspoken severance pay

without much programmed work as we everything we did before winds down

to a halt. Hence, I have time on my hands. As far as new work is

concerned remember one of the quotes I sent you that has to do with such

things. :-)

 

Lewis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedsie2 wrote:

 

>

> In a message dated 2/20/05 10:24:14 AM, lbb10 writes:

>

>

>

>>>All of us are waiting for the end of it which began in 1955. There is

>>

>>not much to do because of this. Whatever will happen will be done by

>>December 2005. By that time or before, All will be taking a hike. The

>>

>>>generosity of the board allows us a sort of unspoken severance pay

>>

>>without much programmed work as we everything we did before winds down

>>to a halt. Hence, I have time on my hands. As far as new work is

>>

>>>concerned remember one of the quotes I sent you that has to do with such

>>

>>things. :-)

>>

>>Lewis

>>

>

>

> Sorry to hear, and good luck with your job search.

> If you haven't found a job by the time the

> paycheck stops, don't forget to file for

> unemployment compensation. I used to

> investigate fraud for the agency, plus

> supervised a unit of quality control

> investigators, so maybe I could be of help, if you

> have questions, or problems, don't hesitate to

> ask me privately.

>

> Best to you,

> Pete

 

 

I have been fortunate in that I have not had to look for a job in 35

years. Been on this one for ten years and was invited by the former

director who was the chairman of my dissertation committee and a

colleague before and at the institute. Always seems to be someone there

to pull me in. No use starting now to search, I suppose. Let's see what

transpires this time. Where will it come from this time? Will it come

down to looking in the conventional way or as it has been all these

years a floating through? I do not know. Let it be as it will be, as

this always worked before. The sparrows appear, the sparrows fly free as

they do. :-).

 

Lewis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...