Stimulating Freyja

[Guest guest]

A: Impulse, stimulation.

 

It simply doesn't stimulate an interest, reaction

or response. Holds no meaning.

Like you and Lewis were demonstrating with the

gobbeldy-goo language. If I read a 'language'

that means nothing to me, there is no

interest, reaction or response stimulated,

unless there is an impulse to find the meaning, if any,

of that language.

 

P: Could I stimulate you to try a little harder

and give some reasons why you won't find such CD stimulating.

After all, people spend billions on simulated games they

like to play for real such as football, baseball,

bowling, etc. You do like , so why not

a simulated list, if it were realistic enough?

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote:

> A: Impulse, stimulation.

>

> It simply doesn't stimulate an interest, reaction

> or response. Holds no meaning.

> Like you and Lewis were demonstrating with the

> gobbeldy-goo language. If I read a 'language'

> that means nothing to me, there is no

> interest, reaction or response stimulated,

> unless there is an impulse to find the meaning, if any,

> of that language.

>

> P: Could I stimulate you to try a little harder

> and give some reasons why you won't find such CD stimulating.

> After all, people spend billions on simulated games they

> like to play for real such as football, baseball,

> bowling, etc. You do like , so why not

> a simulated list, if it were realistic enough?

>

 

 

f.

You asked:

What would a perfectly realistic simulation

lack to turn us off?

 

I am not sure I get where you are coming from.

Why would I even

seek out a simulated list in the first place

if there is already

which is very easily accessed?

 

If it wasn't easily accessed, I probably

would like it well enough. Like hearing

live music is a more full experience than

listening to a CD, however with today's equipment,

you can get a great sound, but not the

live, right now, quality.

 

It's also comparable to if I really enjoy

a person, it's a richer, fuller experience

to be with them, sitting

across from them, looking at them, just being,

in a fuller presence than talking on the phone.

 

So what I hear you asking is that in

the event that there is

the knowing

that it is a computer generated game --

artificial intelligence -- would it just not be

the same as there knowing there is a real

live flesh and blood person there, a live quality, and that

I would lose interest more quickly in the

AI than a real person.

 

What if I didn't have the information

that it was a simulated list and I thought

there were real people responding?

 

or if I simply suspended my beliefs, like

an actor does, and assumes another character.

They often lose themselves in these characters,

not coming out of character between scenes,

and sometimes remaining in character for a while

after finishing the movie.

 

musing...

 

To Be C.....maybe

 

:-)

 

 

 

>

>