Guest guest Posted March 23, 2005 Report Share Posted March 23, 2005 If a person actually had the intelligence the writers of dictionaries ascribe to mankind in general ( " a fast-moving stupidity-wave? " ), he would not need, nor want to, study the writings of those humans who've already passed away, regardless of their level of attainment, unless he wanted to be some type of scientist - who studies physical/material matters of any and all kinds - wherein the primary rule seems to be: " why re-invent the wheel? " (based upon the correct idea: you don't have enough time to " catch-up " ) But if a person wanted to know about non-scientific, non-material matters - like awareness, consciousness, awakening, enlightenment, liberation, psychology, philosophy, etc., etc., including the all-inclusive " What makes me and humanity tick? " - " inventing the wheel " is your only choice, as there are no wheels that you can utilize in there, you have to invent your own, and then you have to learn to ride them to actually " go anywhere. " The nay-sayers who, in their presumed cleverness reply: " there is no where to go, and no one to go there, and no there in any case " (blah, blah, blah), say that because they themselves have never gone anywhere other than where external forces have pushed them, and getting older, and feebler, have simply given up. Funny thing about " inventing " wheels, and then " learning " to ride them, and then " going somewhere new " - you can only describe in the most general of terms, what works for you, and what works for you only works when it >>did<<, and then it's time to invent something new, so you're always in a mode - when discussing such things - of describing that which you've already surpassed, gone beyond, " outgrown " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.