Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 In a message dated 3/26/05 7:21:19 AM, dan330033 writes: > the clarity to know oneself as one is, is not > an oceanic feeling. > > it is moving into and through the omnipresent primordial point, without > moving. > > there is no great psychological thinker who can give > this to you -- because it involves no psychological > process or interpretation, nor way of thinking about it. > > only you can give this to yourself - but not to the " yourself " > of thought and memory image, nor to the self of located perception > in relation to objects. > > -- Dan > > > P: Tell me friend, how have you clarified anything by defining clarity as a movement thru an omnipresent point? It's a beautiful meta4, but no more clear than oceanic feeling. Equally vague and not clarifying is to say that this clarity is conferred to some unnamed self. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 the clarity to know oneself as one is, is not an oceanic feeling. it is moving into and through the omnipresent primordial point, without moving. there is no great psychological thinker who can give this to you -- because it involves no psychological process or interpretation, nor way of thinking about it. only you can give this to yourself - but not to the " yourself " of thought and memory image, nor to the self of located perception in relation to objects. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2005 Report Share Posted March 26, 2005 Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote: > > In a message dated 3/26/05 7:21:19 AM, dan330033 writes: > > > > the clarity to know oneself as one is, is not > > an oceanic feeling. > > > > it is moving into and through the omnipresent primordial point, without > > moving. > > > > there is no great psychological thinker who can give > > this to you -- because it involves no psychological > > process or interpretation, nor way of thinking about it. > > > > only you can give this to yourself - but not to the " yourself " > > of thought and memory image, nor to the self of located perception > > in relation to objects. > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > > P: Tell me friend, how have you clarified anything by defining clarity > as a movement thru an omnipresent point? It's a beautiful meta4, > but no more clear than oceanic feeling. Equally vague and not clarifying > is to say that this clarity is conferred to some unnamed self. ** Nothing you could 'relate to,' or, 'invest in'? That makes it a good post, I'd say! > > Ken > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.