Now I get it .

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " anders_lindman "

<anders_lindman> wrote:

>

>> > >

> > > The splinter is at the same time a split. It is a splinter in

the

> > way

> > > it appears as conflict between the subjectified " you " and the

world.

> > > And it is a split in that it separares experienced phenomena

into a

> > > subjectified " you " and the world. To remove the splinter is the

same

> > > as to heal the split. It comes to the same.

> > >

> > > A thorn that can be used to remove the splinter must also at

the

> > same

> > > time be able to heal the split. That thorn is the true subject

> > itself.

> > > Don't try to fix anything yourself, because that would only

make the

> > > splinter be stuck harder in your mind. Let healing of the split

be

> > > done for you by the true subject and then you will begin to

> > recognize

> > > that you _are_ the true subject and not some shaky phenomena,

and a

> > > shift happens where you go from identifying yourself with the

> > > subjectified " you " to finding a resting home as the true

subject.

> > >

> > > al.

> > >

> > Not bad al. Not bad at all! You have my bones, but Anna has my

> > marrow.

> >

> > Actually, the more " I " think about your answer, the more

impressed I

> > am. You can have some marrow too.

> >

> > Kudos.

>

> Yes, one can experience the split by observing how thought creates a

> " me " and " the world " . And the splinter is the conflict sensed as

> emotions. Both the split and the splinter are the result of a

> subjectification of phenomena (mistaking objects like memories,

> thoughts and knowledge for being a true subject).

>

> al.>>

 

Al I just got it! I was thinking that you said " splint " instead

of " split. "

 

I wasn't " quite " getting it, but now it's totally clear.

 

Yes, right on, right on. It's all just a simple tale (told by no one,

not even an idiot) of the pseudo-entity thinking it's the True

Subject. Every thing else is called History.

 

Al, you just made my day.