Guest guest Posted April 18, 2005 Report Share Posted April 18, 2005 Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote: > P: Correct! And you said that very nicely, you, devilish, non- > existent, > > typeholic, little entity. > > D: Nope, one doesn't get to land on " existence. " > Wrong address! > > P: If Dan can talk about about it, so can he, and so can I. > And you're outnumber two of our zeros to your lonely zero. > What are you disagreeing about, anyway? How is your sentence > above different from his " No one exist, there is only existence. " > What were you trying to say? > Who could be that one who doesn't exist, and doesn't > get to land? > Anyway, you know you can only answer a toomb's post in jest, > you have a better change to teach your monitor > nonduality, than to teach toomb anything. > > All minds seek to reinforce their delusional foundations by seeking agreement. It is extremely unlikely that any two imaginary individuals will ever agree upon any speculation concerning the nature of their personal experience of reality. Some minds seek personal validation by attempting to teach the perceived other about their personal religion......some do not. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2005 Report Share Posted April 18, 2005 Hmm Pete, I realized that too that Dan sometimes is disagreeing his own insights when written by another person. It seems he only does this when Judi is arround. Werner Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote: > P: Correct! And you said that very nicely, you, devilish, non- > existent, > > typeholic, little entity. > > D: Nope, one doesn't get to land on " existence. " > Wrong address! > > P: If Dan can talk about about it, so can he, and so can I. > And you're outnumber two of our zeros to your lonely zero. > What are you disagreeing about, anyway? How is your sentence > above different from his " No one exist, there is only existence. " > What were you trying to say? > Who could be that one who doesn't exist, and doesn't > get to land? > Anyway, you know you can only answer a toomb's post in jest, > you have a better change to teach your monitor > nonduality, than to teach toomb anything. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.