Guest guest Posted April 18, 2005 Report Share Posted April 18, 2005 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote: > > > > P: Correct! And you said that very nicely, you, devilish, > > non- > > > > existent, > > > > > typeholic, little entity. > > > > > > > > D: Nope, one doesn't get to land on " existence. " > > > > Wrong address! > > > > > > > > P: If Dan can talk about about it, so can he, and > > so can I. > > > > And you're outnumber two of our zeros to your lonely > > zero. > > > > What are you disagreeing about, anyway? How is your > > sentence > > > > above different from his " No one exist, there is only > > existence. " > > > > What were you trying to say? > > > > Who could be that one who doesn't exist, and doesn't > > > > get to land? > > > > Anyway, you know you can only answer a toomb's > > post in jest, > > > > you have a better change to teach your monitor > > > > nonduality, than to teach toomb anything. > > > > To refuse learning is to maintain a wall. > > > > To maintain a wall, even the most subtle of walls, > > is to have security in an enclosure. > > > > Even if one calls that " nonenclosure. " > > > > > > > > All minds seek to reinforce their delusional foundations by > > seeking agreement. > > > > > > It is extremely unlikely that any two imaginary individuals will > > ever agree upon any speculation concerning the nature of their > > personal experience of reality. > > > > > > Some minds seek personal validation by attempting to teach the > > perceived other about their personal religion......some do not. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > You don't know what all minds do. > > > > > > > > You only know what your mind tells you that all minds do. > > > > Instead of trying to say what all minds do, you could look into > > what the mind of Toom is doing. > > > > A mind that can actually look into its self.......Now......that's an interesting idea. If you think you're the mind looking into itself, then you indeed *are* the problem. > A mind that can split itself into an observer part.....and an observed part...and then somehow come back together...and figure itself out.....hummmm. > > Well.........I'm gonna try that...... Sounds pretty useless to me, but keep at it if you're enjoying! > uggggggggg > > > uggggggggggg > > > > uggggggg > > > > Oh.....I think it's working...... > > I have a splitting headache. > > One of us will try to get back to one of you on this. Nah. Just look into the activity of Toom's mind, and then see if you really continue to believe that mind defines who and where you are. > > Nah, that would be too simple. > > > > Nothing to preach about then. > > > > Still, keep on preaching. > > > > I enjoy your talk about how you aren't an entity > > > No " you " don't. > > Why do you assume that it is your own personal enjoyment.... " You " should know better. I don't see anyone else here enjoying it. Sure it's my enjoyment, regardless of the quotation marks you use. Hey, let me try that trick: I don't see anyone else here enjoying it, do " you " ? > > which you present for > > the sake of all the nonentities you believe are out > > there not listening to you in a dream you think you're > > having. I assure you all us nonentity dream characters are enjoying your posts about how there is no one here but just the dream. Well, maybe not *all* of us. Well, at least me. :-) -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2005 Report Share Posted April 18, 2005 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote: > > > > P: Correct! And you said that very nicely, you, devilish, > > non- > > > > existent, > > > > > typeholic, little entity. > > > > > > > > D: Nope, one doesn't get to land on " existence. " > > > > Wrong address! > > > > > > > > P: If Dan can talk about about it, so can he, and > > so can I. > > > > And you're outnumber two of our zeros to your lonely > > zero. > > > > What are you disagreeing about, anyway? How is your > > sentence > > > > above different from his " No one exist, there is only > > existence. " > > > > What were you trying to say? > > > > Who could be that one who doesn't exist, and doesn't > > > > get to land? > > > > Anyway, you know you can only answer a toomb's > > post in jest, > > > > you have a better change to teach your monitor > > > > nonduality, than to teach toomb anything. > > > > To refuse learning is to maintain a wall. > > > > To maintain a wall, even the most subtle of walls, > > is to have security in an enclosure. > > > > Even if one calls that " nonenclosure. " > > > > > > > > All minds seek to reinforce their delusional foundations by > > seeking agreement. > > > > > > It is extremely unlikely that any two imaginary individuals will > > ever agree upon any speculation concerning the nature of their > > personal experience of reality. > > > > > > Some minds seek personal validation by attempting to teach the > > perceived other about their personal religion......some do not. > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > You don't know what all minds do. > > > > > > > > You only know what your mind tells you that all minds do. > > > > Instead of trying to say what all minds do, you could look into > > what the mind of Toom is doing. > > > > A mind that can actually look into its self.......Now......that's an interesting idea. If you think you're the mind looking into itself, then you indeed *are* the problem. > A mind that can split itself into an observer part.....and an observed part...and then somehow come back together...and figure itself out.....hummmm. > > Well.........I'm gonna try that...... Sounds pretty useless to me, but keep at it if you're enjoying! > uggggggggg > > > uggggggggggg > > > > uggggggg > > > > Oh.....I think it's working...... > > I have a splitting headache. > > One of us will try to get back to one of you on this. Nah. Just look into the activity of Toom's mind, and then see if you really continue to believe that mind defines who and where you are. > > Nah, that would be too simple. > > > > Nothing to preach about then. > > > > Still, keep on preaching. > > > > I enjoy your talk about how you aren't an entity > > > No " you " don't. > > Why do you assume that it is your own personal enjoyment.... " You " should know better. I don't see anyone else here enjoying it. Sure it's my enjoyment, regardless of the quotation marks you use. Hey, let me try that trick: I don't see anyone else here enjoying it, do " you " ? > > which you present for > > the sake of all the nonentities you believe are out > > there not listening to you in a dream you think you're > > having. I assure you all us nonentity dream characters are enjoying your posts about how there is no one here but just the dream. Well, maybe not *all* of us. Well, at least me. :-) -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.