Guest guest Posted April 22, 2005 Report Share Posted April 22, 2005 Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > - > kenj02001 > Nisargadatta > Friday, April 22, 2005 2:09 AM > Re: Niz's teaching / Fuzzy > > > > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Charlie Hayes > <chreiki3> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I can't deny it any longer. A person can 'nyeti-nyeti' > themselves > > silly. I AM is all there is. It's sweet. Just be. That's all. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well.......you can try. > > > .......................... > > > > > > > > > but: > > > > > > > > > ....another thirty.......forty years........you're outta here. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > What's up, toombaru: > > > > You're still hung up on the body. That's the problem. You are not > your > > body. The self is aware of the body. If you notice, you will see > that > > you are aware of the body. Hence, you are not the body, but, the > body > > is merely an activity, among many, that occurs in your awareness. > It's > > the same with the mind. The body and the mind are essentially the > > same. Thought is a physiological process that occurs in the brain > and > > nervous system. It is a bodily function. You are aware of all of > this > > body-mind functioning, but, you are not this body-mind. You are the > > awareness of that. > > > > None of these " things " that you are aware of are You, the Self. You > > are simply the awareness in which all of these " things " occur. > > > > Identifying the Self with the body-mind is the biggest obstacle to > > self-realization. But, it can be overcome by earnestly and > seriously > > seeing for yourself. Then, you will know without trying. > > > > Yours, > > > > fuzzie > > ** Conceptually isolating " awareness " is another > identifying, another strategy. It's not separable, nor > ultimate; there are no knowable ultimates. Thinking, speaking, > perceiving, sensing, etc. dualistically " create " impressions, > virtual-like energies, which immediately and simultaneously > dissolve, along with the (inferred) aware-ing of > them. All movements return to rest, including all the repetitive > emoting about " awareness " in contemporary spiritual circles. > > Actually, nothing 'occurs,' nothing happens, nothing > is 'realized.' > The non-conceptual, non-realizable totality just *is* -- > uncreated and unformed, unconditional and unconditioned. > There is only that, not " we " who are that. > > On the other hand, being serious and earnest about > apparent motivations IS en-lightening. > > Ken > > > close Ken, no cigar, > > This *Is* is who we are. Never was any other way. Just that 'we' saw not. > > Everything else is just 'motivation' > keeping One locked in 'un-seeing'. > > Unless Ken sees this from experience all are just words about, without meaning, a parroting. > > Why would there be such a thing as Being if there would not be such a thing as Knowing? > > Love, > Anna Anna rocks!! (no wonder Toomey is so enchanted) IamtheEmancoocooahhchoo! > > > > > > ** > > If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription, sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups: > > /mygroups?edit=1 > > Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta group and click on Save Changes. > > > > > > -- ---------- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.