Guest guest Posted April 22, 2005 Report Share Posted April 22, 2005 Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > - > anders_lindman > Nisargadatta > Friday, April 22, 2005 7:31 AM > Re: Pound of Shit > > > > Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > > > - > > anders_lindman > > Nisargadatta > > Friday, April 22, 2005 5:36 AM > > Re: Pound of Shit > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " > <fuzzie_wuz> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote: > > > > > > > > In a message dated 4/21/05 2:25:02 PM, anders_lindman writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Say, if you are so busy deleting posts, how can you be so > sure what > > > > > they are about? Did you delete this post b t w? Do you use your > > > > > preconceived ideas as a criteria for deleting posts, or is your > > > > > intuition keen enough to sense the content of a post by its > title? > > > > > > > > > > al. > > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Since you asked, below are the confessions of a deleting > > dilettante. > > > > Obviously, I didn't delete this one. Why? because I knew you > > > > were answering my post. I know your posts are about angst and > > > > speculation. If I'm in the mood for that, and the traffic is > low, I > > > > will read one or two. I read all posts by Dan, Werner, Lewis, > > > > Muralis, Kip, and most of the other non-habitual posters. People > > > > who post to chit-chat, and to relieve boredom, or out of confusion > > > > day in and day out, I seldom read. > > > > > > > > > Dear Pedsie2: > > > > > > I apologize. I have been on this forum about 2 weeks, now. I was > just > > > having some fun with it. Somebody gave me an old computer and I > hooked > > > it up and then I found this forum and started talking to people > on it. > > > And, it's been fun. But, if it's bugging you and you are > irritated by > > > me, then, man, I'm gonna try to make a concerted effort and not post > > > so much on here. I don't want to bother anybody or start any > trouble. > > > I've just been having some fun, man. I hope you understand. > > > > > > I don't know if you've read any of my posts, but, I am totally into > > > what Nisargadatta was about. So, I'm not on here to just jerk > > > somebody's chain or to be a troll or anything like that. I'm > serious. > > > Just wanted you to know that. > > > > > > Yours, > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > Fuzzie, that was a much more moderate reply to Pete than I made. But > > to my defence I must stress that my reply was an attempt to use > > second-tier thinking and post ANGRY words as a reply. But of course > > one has to be polite too. What I understand about second-tier thinking > > is that one can then be extremely nasty and/or very nice, and > > everything in between, depending on the situation. Although I am not > > sure exactly when to be nasty and when to be nice. :-) My idea is that > > in first-tier thinking one can be angry without exactly knowing why, > > while in second-tier thinking one knows when to be rude. > > > > But I think I will also slow down a bit lest there will be too much > > spam-like posting from me. Or maybe I will *increase* my posting rate > > to see how people (and myself) react. :-] > > > > al. > > > > > > > > good morning (((((Al))))), > > If I might, I would say 2nd tier is all about balance and seeing > where the 'other' as 'We' is stuck and not 'auto reply' nor > retreating in any manner shape or form. After all, " you' and 'other' > have equal importance. > > > > Love, > > loretta (formerly known as Anna) > > > > > Hi loretta, > > 2nd tier is really what Eckhart Tolle calls a new state of > consciousness. In that state you *know* that you and the world are > one, and not just having personal opinions or self-delusions about it. > I suspect that Tolle is correct, but that he hasn't reached 2nd tier > yet. Only the planet as a whole can reach 2nd tier. Everything else is > an ego delusion. No one on earth has reached true 2nd tier yet. > > Ken Wilber talks about new holons emerging and embracing previous > holons, such as cells embracing molecules embracing atoms... What is > the next holon? Planetary consciousness - the whole planet becomes a > new holon on an _entirely_ different level than what Ken Wilber can > surmise from his _own_ theories! He hasn't grocked his own theory! > What is the difference between a single cell and a human being? Quite > a pretty big difference! What is the difference between one level of > holon to the next level? The difference is clearly seen between a > single cell and a human being. The next level is the difference > between a human being and the whole planet as a single new holon. > > al. > > > > Hey Al, > YEAH, so? If one has not experienced what one is writing about (once having been a distinct possible possibility), what can one REALLY say about <it>? > > Next level is really quite simple, again there never was a difference, only the separated, differentiated " I " , 'thought' > difference via unidentification with Consciousness as Being. > > loretta. >> It's like they say, al, if you want to grow up to be a frog, the best way to do it, is just to be TRUE to your own toad self and let Nature take its course. Mr. toadiE > > > > > > ** > > If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription, sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups: > > /mygroups?edit=1 > > Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta group and click on Save Changes. > > > > > > -- ---------- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.