Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Natahan Gills Clarity

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

A recent read online of Nathans " Clarity " has had a profound effect on

me.I will never see life the same way as I used to any more after

reading this and being this. The story goes on but without the sense

of I have to do this or I had better do that. Stuff just happens the

way its supposed to including the pleasure and the pain. Also the

bliss that comes with this clarity is so peaceful. Its funny but now I

understand just being as spoken by the masters and it is awsome.

A big thanks to Nathan and Tony Parsons who have pointed out so

clearly in english just what is and that this is it.

Peace my friends,Douglas...................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " chefboy2160 " <chefboy2160> wrote:

>

> A recent read online of Nathans " Clarity " has had a profound effect on

> me.I will never see life the same way as I used to any more after

> reading this and being this. The story goes on but without the sense

> of I have to do this or I had better do that. Stuff just happens the

> way its supposed to including the pleasure and the pain. Also the

> bliss that comes with this clarity is so peaceful. Its funny but now I

> understand just being as spoken by the masters and it is awsome.

> A big thanks to Nathan and Tony Parsons who have pointed out so

> clearly in english just what is and that this is it.

> Peace my friends,Douglas...................

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm sorry Douglas.

 

 

 

If you think you have it.......................You don't.

 

 

 

Go sit down.

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi toombaru , thanks and well Im glad I do not have

" it " . There realy is nothing to have and no one to

have it.This is it right now,nothing else but this.

The clouds did not burst open and a loud voice from

heaven did not give approval but there has been a

shift in perception and understanding.

You are that always . Who knows how doors are opened

or kept closed but this is closer to you than your own

breath.The only thing stopping people from realizing

there true nature is there inability to perceive the

obvious.When the search stops your true nature can be

seen.I am as you toombaru.peace,Douglas

--- toombaru2004 <cptc wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " chefboy2160 "

> <chefboy2160> wrote:

> >

> > A recent read online of Nathans " Clarity " has had

> a profound effect on

> > me.I will never see life the same way as I used to

> any more after

> > reading this and being this. The story goes on but

> without the sense

> > of I have to do this or I had better do that.

> Stuff just happens the

> > way its supposed to including the pleasure and the

> pain. Also the

> > bliss that comes with this clarity is so peaceful.

> Its funny but now I

> > understand just being as spoken by the masters and

> it is awsome.

> > A big thanks to Nathan and Tony Parsons who have

> pointed out so

> > clearly in english just what is and that this is

> it.

> > Peace my friends,Douglas...................

I'm sorry Douglas.

>

>

>

> If you think you have it.......................You

> don't.

>

>

>

> Go sit down.

>

>

> toombaru

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , douglas cobb <chefboy2160>

wrote:

> Hi toombaru , thanks and well Im glad I do not have

> " it " . There realy is nothing to have and no one to

> have it.This is it right now,nothing else but this.

> The clouds did not burst open and a loud voice from

> heaven did not give approval but there has been a

> shift in perception and understanding.

> You are that always . Who knows how doors are opened

> or kept closed but this is closer to you than your own

> breath.The only thing stopping people from realizing

> there true nature is there inability to perceive the

> obvious.

 

 

 

 

Well that's the catch.

 

" People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>When the search stops your true nature can be

> seen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

By whom?

 

 

 

 

tombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

toombaru2004 wrote:

 

>

> Well that's the catch.

>

> " People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

>

>

This is so true. Only dogs have buddha nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> toombaru2004 wrote:

>

> >

> > Well that's the catch.

> >

> > " People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

> >

> >

> This is so true. Only dogs have buddha nature.

 

 

Only Buddha has Buddha nature.

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , douglas cobb

<chefboy2160>

> wrote:

> > Hi toombaru , thanks and well Im glad I do not have

> > " it " . There realy is nothing to have and no one to

> > have it.This is it right now,nothing else but this.

> > The clouds did not burst open and a loud voice from

> > heaven did not give approval but there has been a

> > shift in perception and understanding.

> > You are that always . Who knows how doors are opened

> > or kept closed but this is closer to you than your own

> > breath.The only thing stopping people from realizing

> > there true nature is there inability to perceive the

> > obvious.

>

>

>

>

> Well that's the catch.

>

> " People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

>

>

>

 

 

f:

 

" There is no such thing as enlightenment;

the appreciation of this fact is itself

enlightenment " ~Nisargadatta Maharaj

 

 

The awarer, the knower, the perceiver

of the illusion, is part of the illusion.

 

 

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>When the search stops your true nature can be

> > seen.

By whom?

>

>

>

>

> tombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

toombaru2004 wrote:

 

>

> Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> > toombaru2004 wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > Well that's the catch.

> > >

> > > " People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

> > >

> > >

> > This is so true. Only dogs have buddha nature.

>

>

> Only Buddha has Buddha nature.

>

>

> toombaru

>

Where does he keep it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

Harsha

Nisargadatta

Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:14 PM

Re: Re: Natahan Gills " Clarity "

 

 

toombaru2004 wrote:

 

>

> Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> > toombaru2004 wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > Well that's the catch.

> > >

> > > " People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

> > >

> > >

> > This is so true. Only dogs have buddha nature.

>

>

> Only Buddha has Buddha nature.

>

>

> toombaru

>

Where does he keep it?

 

 

One does not 'keep' Buddha nature....

 

 

**

 

If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription,

sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups:

 

/mygroups?edit=1

 

Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta

group and click on Save Changes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

Harsha

Nisargadatta

Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:18 PM

Re: Re: Natahan Gills " Clarity "

 

 

carolina112900 wrote:

 

> f:

>

> The awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> of the illusion, is part of the illusion.

>

What is illusion?

 

**

Separation

 

 

 

If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription,

sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups:

 

/mygroups?edit=1

 

Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta

group and click on Save Changes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> carolina112900 wrote:

>

> > f:

> >

> > The awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> > of the illusion, is part of the illusion.

> >

> What is illusion?

 

 

Illusion is the sense of separation.

But there is not two. of anything.

 

Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.

Formed matter is condensed emptiness,

and emptiness is not better than matter,

or vice versa.

 

Neurotransmitters come together in a

chemical reaction and the sense or experience

of the I AM arises.

 

The illusion is that of being a person

with past, present, future, a plan, a

mission, a life, a past life, other lives

to incarnate into, a spirituality that

includes an afterlife, Awareness,

Pure Being, etc. The I AM wants to go

on forever.

 

 

The brain and nervous system focus on

only a small piece of the emptiness -

matter - which is but an

abstraction of emptiness. This happens

because the purpose of the nervous system

is survival of the organism,

and also to organize chaos. The nervous

system does that automatically which is why

thoughts occur after the fact.

 

But...the awarer, the knower, the perceiver

of the illusion of the sense of separation,

is itself part of the illusion of the sense

of separation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Anna Ruiz wrote:

 

>

>

>

> -

> Harsha

> Nisargadatta

> Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:18 PM

> Re: Re: Natahan Gills " Clarity "

>

>

> carolina112900 wrote:

>

> > f:

> >

> > The awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> > of the illusion, is part of the illusion.

> >

> What is illusion?

>

> **

> Separation

>

In order for there to be separation, there must be two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Anna Ruiz wrote:

 

>

>

> > Only Buddha has Buddha nature.

> >

> >

> > toombaru

> >

> Where does he keep it?

>

>

> One does not 'keep' Buddha nature....

>

Good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

carolina112900 wrote:

 

>

>

> But...the awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> of the illusion of the sense of separation,

> is itself part of the illusion of the sense

> of separation

>

So is your statement part of the illusion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> carolina112900 wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > But...the awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> > of the illusion of the sense of separation,

> > is itself part of the illusion of the sense

> > of separation

> >

> So is your statement part of the illusion?

 

 

Sure.

 

Words depend on other words depend on other

words depend on other words.... Language

and the concepts and constructs it forms is a system

onto itself, and is part of the abstraction of

emptiness. It has no meaning at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

carolina112900 wrote:

 

>

> Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> > carolina112900 wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >

> > > But...the awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> > > of the illusion of the sense of separation,

> > > is itself part of the illusion of the sense

> > > of separation

> > >

> > So is your statement part of the illusion?

>

>

> Sure.

>

OK. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> carolina112900 wrote:

>

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> > > carolina112900 wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > But...the awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> > > > of the illusion of the sense of separation,

> > > > is itself part of the illusion of the sense

> > > > of separation

> > > >

> > > So is your statement part of the illusion?

> >

> >

> > Sure.

> >

> OK. Thanks.

 

 

The concept " illusional " implies that there is a state or condition that is

non-illusional.

 

Since all " things " are illusional...in that they could have no automomous

existential reality......this hypothetical .... " non-illusional " state could not

exist.

 

 

Perhaps this is what Wei Wu Wei intends to say in his statement that there is

nothing outside of the dream.

 

(and nothing in it) toombaru

 

 

 

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " chefboy2160 " <chefboy2160>

wrote:

>

> A recent read online of Nathans " Clarity " has had a profound effect

on

> me.I will never see life the same way as I used to any more after

> reading this and being this. The story goes on but without the sense

> of I have to do this or I had better do that. Stuff just happens the

> way its supposed to including the pleasure and the pain. Also the

> bliss that comes with this clarity is so peaceful. Its funny but now

I

> understand just being as spoken by the masters and it is awsome.

> A big thanks to Nathan and Tony Parsons who have pointed out so

> clearly in english just what is and that this is it.

> Peace my friends,Douglas...................

 

 

there is no bliss in clarity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...>

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , douglas cobb

<chefboy2160>

> wrote:

> > Hi toombaru , thanks and well Im glad I do not have

> > " it " . There realy is nothing to have and no one to

> > have it.This is it right now,nothing else but this.

> > The clouds did not burst open and a loud voice from

> > heaven did not give approval but there has been a

> > shift in perception and understanding.

> > You are that always . Who knows how doors are opened

> > or kept closed but this is closer to you than your own

> > breath.The only thing stopping people from realizing

> > there true nature is there inability to perceive the

> > obvious.

 

 

> Well that's the catch.

>

> " People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

 

 

 

That's another catch!

 

 

 

> >When the search stops your true nature can be

> > seen.

By whom?

 

 

Exactly! By whom?

 

:))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> Anna Ruiz wrote:

>

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > Harsha

> > Nisargadatta

> > Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:18 PM

> > Re: Re: Natahan Gills " Clarity "

> >

> >

> > carolina112900 wrote:

> >

> > > f:

> > >

> > > The awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> > > of the illusion, is part of the illusion.

> > >

> > What is illusion?

> >

> > **

> > Separation

> >

> In order for there to be separation, there must be two.

 

 

One is enough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The concept " illusional " implies that there is a state or condition

that is non-illusional.

 

Since all " things " are illusional...in that they could have no

automomous existential reality......this hypothetical .... " non-

illusional " state could not exist.

 

Perhaps this is what Wei Wu Wei intends to say in his statement that

there is nothing outside of the dream.

(and nothing in it) toombaru

 

 

KA: Flowerish but yes! By the way, what is Toombaru intending to say?

The net enables you to teach without dialectic. You found a niche.

Outside the net you would need to fight if you wanted to teach. I am

happy to see you offer a link to Wei Wu Wei. That's dialectic, too.

Nothing wrong with scaffolds, gantries and frameworks....unless you

teach just for the sake of having disciples or readers.

 

 

cordially,

Kip Almazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " kipalmazy " <kipalmazy>

wrote:

>

> The concept " illusional " implies that there is a state or

condition

> that is non-illusional.

>

> Since all " things " are illusional...in that they could have no

> automomous existential reality......this hypothetical .... " non-

> illusional " state could not exist.

>

> Perhaps this is what Wei Wu Wei intends to say in his statement

that

> there is nothing outside of the dream.

> (and nothing in it) toombaru

>

>

> KA: Flowerish but yes! By the way, what is Toombaru intending to

say?

> The net enables you to teach without dialectic. You found a niche.

> Outside the net you would need to fight if you wanted to teach. I

am

> happy to see you offer a link to Wei Wu Wei. That's dialectic,

too.

> Nothing wrong with scaffolds, gantries and frameworks....unless

you

> teach just for the sake of having disciples or readers.

>

>

> cordially,

> Kip Almazy

 

 

Just endorsing your shy attempts to use some dialectics...you can if

you want! Just climb down from the " one-liner pedestal " ! It could be

fun seeing Toombaru swinging the sword in a grueling carnage of

concepts. Is getting hot in here with too much Krishnas!

 

for all:

 

http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Gita/verse-13-18.html

 

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/canon/sutta/khuddaka/dhp/01.html

 

 

KA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

-

Harsha

Nisargadatta

Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:59 PM

Re: Re: Natahan Gills " Clarity "

 

 

Anna Ruiz wrote:

 

>

>

>

> -

> Harsha

> Nisargadatta

> Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:18 PM

> Re: Re: Natahan Gills " Clarity "

>

>

> carolina112900 wrote:

>

> > f:

> >

> > The awarer, the knower, the perceiver

> > of the illusion, is part of the illusion.

> >

> What is illusion?

>

> **

> Separation

>

In order for there to be separation, there must be two.

 

 

yes......and......no

 

 

 

**

 

If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription,

sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups:

 

/mygroups?edit=1

 

Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta

group and click on Save Changes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Harsha wrote:

> toombaru2004 wrote:

>

> >

> > Well that's the catch.

> >

> > " People " do not have a true nature that can be realized.

> >

> >

> This is so true. Only dogs have buddha nature.>>

 

Mu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...