Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Opposite of Compassion – if Not me then “who” ...?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

>>...Still they can NOT let it go.

 

 

 

>>They can NOT let it slip.

 

 

 

>>Because, they are afraid, if they

 

don't take care of this little 'me' (

 

no matter how much made-up it might be

 

) No one else will.

 

 

 

>>They also see countless other 'me's

 

ready and willing to tear this little

 

'me' apart how can they Give it Up ?

 

 

 

>>...how can I let it die ?

 

 

 

>>If NOT me, who else will defend it ?

 

 

 

 

 

Letting it die may not only feel

 

unwise and foolish but, it might also

 

feel ... irresponsible, unkind and

 

inhuman!

 

 

 

Here people talk about taking care of

 

the planet, the humanity, the

 

civilization, the cosmos ...

 

 

 

and, here you are Not willing to take

 

care of the 'me' who seems totally

 

dependent on Just You !

 

 

 

....it feels so uncompassionate !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Adithya K <adithya_comming>

wrote:

>

> What you see as " yourself " , the

>

> 'yourself' that you know,

>

> ...disappear in sleep,

>

> and anytime ...you are Not thinking.

>

>

>

> You know that all conditioning, all

>

> thoughts and all ideas that you have of

>

> a person is ...NOT really you.

>

>

>

> It is something that you can create,

>

> it is something that you do create

>

> using the memories and thoughts.

>

>

>

> Still None of them is ...really you.

>

> ...just an image that create and then

>

> you call it 'X', " Y " , " Z " , ... " the

>

> name " .

>

>

>

> Much like the painting that you create

>

> using colors, canvas and brush and

>

> little bit of imagination.

>

>

>

> Still you are the Creator,

>

> ...Not the Creation,

>

> ...not the painting.

>

>

>

> .

>

> ...

>

> .....

>

>

>

> Just like, you are able to create an

>

> image of 'X' others are able to create

>

> an image of that 'X' too.

>

>

>

> Image that you create of 'X' ( also

>

> known as 'yourself' ) changes. Many

>

> times, it is subject to thought,

>

> emotions, what you hear from others ...

>

>

>

> Image that others have of 'X' ( also

>

> known as 'yourself' ) changes both from

>

> time to time as well as from person to

>

> person. It depends on " what they know

>

> of this 'X' " , " who they are " , " what

>

> they want from this person 'X' " as well

>

> as ...what thoughts, emotions are

>

> currently running in their mind.

>

>

>

> All 'me' s are concerned with

>

> protection this 'X' (known as 'myself'

>

> ) and many of them already know that it

>

> is NOT really ...them. Others might

>

> easily know it on investigations.

>

>

>

> ...Still they can NOT let it go.

>

>

>

> They can NOT let it slip.

>

>

>

> Because, they are afraid, if they

>

> don't take care of this little 'me' (

>

> no matter how much made-up it might be

>

> ) No one else will.

>

>

>

> They also see countless other 'me's

>

> ready and willing to tear this little

>

> 'me' apart how can they Give it Up ?

>

>

>

> ...how can I let it die ?

>

>

>

> If NOT me, who else will defend it ?

 

 

 

 

The concern about " I " or " me " or the making up of these or the

defending of these or any concern about knowing these remotely or not

or some other concern are of no particular use to the billions or even

the millions.

 

This advice has been repeated over the centuries without ceasing. The

origins of these words, the people and places, are filled with

suffering and ignorance and means little to them except to those

fascinated with it and centered in these words somehow twirl

continuously in it as it is. It spreads.

 

The world and all its billions of little " I-s " and " me-s " will

continue to flourish and pass on regardless of these words and all

those like it. The few twirlers are a species, a type, like a

squirrel, bird, fish, insect or bacterium and serve their role among

the billions. See them twirl. Do they see the twirling species? Can

the twirlers see they are twirling in a niche while others do what

they do.

 

Being afraid is part of living. Each deals with it as it comes.

Suffering is the same. Joy or happiness or bliss, whatever comes and

goes and so...

 

Knowing those words, being them, becoming them does not change what

life is or alter what is or what you are. Breathing, sleeping, eating,

drinking, excreting, waking, covering the body, moving about, going

here to there and back and around, doing this and that to survive,

sitting, resting, continues and most of a lifetime is spent doing

these simple things.

 

Twirling on is just one part of the flourishing and passing. Some make

money on it. Most just twirl.

 

The " I " and " me " never leaves. It is natural. Look at the " I-s " and

" me-s " here. There is one and another and another. Not one is missing.

 

Exterminating or loosing or releasing " I " and " me " or whatever doing

that can be called is just on more way for an appearance to pass time.

 

Twirling like this must be pleasant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...