Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Fuzzie, > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's all imaginings, quite astonishing really? To Be all of > > > > this? To be the mountain and still ''go up on the mountain " . Indeed. > > > > > > > > > > Advaita-talk is a prerequisite, in a sense, to find 'something', > > > > which is obscured, by ascertaining what it is not, does have its > > > > rewards, does it not? > > > > > > > > > > I assure you I am real, as I am assured by you, Fuzzie that you > > > > are; real enough to sit with me and partake in coffee and pie. > > > > > > > > > > Of course no one, including you and I know what life and death > > > > are. There are many endeavors existing--to explains--all the > > > > sciences, all the philosophies, all the religions. Then there > are all > > > > the words and works of these for our viewing and listening pleasure. > > > > Then the human, with the capacity to explore, create and divide and > > > > contain. > > > > > > > > > > And the One who would call himself/herself thus--the > > > > imaginer--breathtaking. I have laughed countless times at the > > > > absurdity " anna " was. I now seem to weep often at this grand grand > > > > beauty of a Life I have imagined for my self. > > > > > > > > > > And like the solipsistic one I am, I fear how this shall continue > > > > when I am no more..After all, it is all in my head. > > > > > > > > > > The dilemma of creation Shines as creation... > > > > > > > > > > Love, > > > > > Anna > > > > > > > > > > I will see you before the end of the month > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You aint the body. That's the thing. There is only being. And, > > > > even > > > > that aint it. It just is. You can't say nothing about it. I give > > > > up... > > > > Let me know 'fore you see me. I'll try to clean up a little bit. I > > > > lay > > > > around down here in this alley all the time and I can get kinda > > > > gamey, sometimes. > > > > > > > > Alright then, > > > > > > > > fuzzie smellie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey There Fuzzie Smellie, > > > > > > She ain't the body. You ain't the body. So what difference does it > > > make if you are in an alley stinkin.' No one can say nothing about > >it. > > > > > > Alrighty then, > > > > > > LOL > > > > > > LOL!!! > > > > Good point, Lewis. When confronting the public, though, they have > > these expectations that if one does not try to conform to on at least > > a minimal basis, it can become more trouble than it's worth. So, I > > figure, take the road of least resistance. But, theoretically, you are > > correct. But, to be self, conforming to social conventions or not > > conforming makes no difference. You can never not be the self no > > matter what. To not be/know self is illusion; ignorance. In self, > > there are no rules. Just be. You can never not be. Try it. It don't > > work. Except for Toombaru. He's the only one who can not be and tell > > you you are not being at the same time. He has some kind of > > supernatural power like that. (I kid, toombaru). > > > > I remember hearing or reading that Ramana used to stay in this > > basement of an old building somewhere around Arunachala there. These > > guys said they'd go down there and check on him once in awhile and > > he'd be sitting down in this dank, dark basement, on the ground with > > dust and debris on him, bugs crawling on him, sores on his legs and > > what not. He was really out there, man. He was diggin' on some kind of > > heavy vibe. Ramana was a trip. > > > > Yours, > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > Fuzzie, > > > > It is not a theory. Smelliness, dirtiness, disfigurement, poverty, > > deformity, etc. does not matter to the realized. They are not that and > > flow with all these as it is. Is that not so? > > > > Love, > > > > Lewis > > I just went over that, Lewis. I said that one can be as nasty as they > wanna be. Or, they can clean up and wear a suit and tie. Or, whatever. > There are no rules. See my previous post. The " theoretically " meant > that you were right that being " smelly " is not " forbidden " . > > Yours truly, > > fuzzie Ok Fuzzie. It is understood. Love, Lewis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.