Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Golden Rule/Ahimsa/Nonviolence

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Most religions and spiritual teachings have as a part of their creed,

the equivalent of the Goldent Rule which says:

" Do unto others, as you would have done unto you. "

 

But there is an addition to this saying, which is included in some

eastern traditions. It says: " Don't do unto others what you would not

want done to you. "

 

That is ahimsa. That is nonviolence.

 

Om Shanti--Durga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Durga " <durgaji108> wrote:

> Most religions and spiritual teachings have as a part of their creed,

> the equivalent of the Goldent Rule which says:

> " Do unto others, as you would have done unto you. "

>

> But there is an addition to this saying, which is included in some

> eastern traditions. It says: " Don't do unto others what you would not

> want done to you. "

>

> That is ahimsa. That is nonviolence.

>

> Om Shanti--Durga

 

 

The belief in " others " ........is violence.

 

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...>

wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " Durga " <durgaji108>

wrote:

> > Most religions and spiritual teachings have as a part of their

creed,

> > the equivalent of the Goldent Rule which says:

> > " Do unto others, as you would have done unto you. "

> >

> > But there is an addition to this saying, which is included in

some

> > eastern traditions. It says: " Don't do unto others what you

would not

> > want done to you. "

> >

> > That is ahimsa. That is nonviolence.

> >

> > Om Shanti--Durga

>

>

> The belief in " others " ........is violence.

>

>

>

> toombaru

 

devi: how so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Durga " <durgaji108> wrote:

> Most religions and spiritual teachings have as a part of their

creed,

> the equivalent of the Goldent Rule which says:

> " Do unto others, as you would have done unto you. "

>

> But there is an addition to this saying, which is included in some

> eastern traditions. It says: " Don't do unto others what you would

not

> want done to you. "

>

> That is ahimsa. That is nonviolence.

>

> Om Shanti--Durga

 

 

'Perfect', 'forced', 'made up', 'tried'

Non-violence, 'love', 'kindness',

'compassion', 'peace' has been tried by

many, many religions and people.

 

I have NEVER seen a pope who doesn't

'demonstrate' love, compassion,

kindness, compassion and peace. Same

goes for every Catholic priest that I

have ever met in my life ...

 

Results of all this demonstrated

'compassion', 'kindness', and 'love' as

well as real reality of it ....

 

..

....

......

 

Remember, Existence is neither Violent

nor non-violent or ...it is Both!

 

Either there is No Birth and Death or

if there is birth, ....there is death

Too! Birth and Death arise together !

 

 

Same Existence that gives birth to

beautiful, delicate flowers is also

HOME to bugs that eat them.

 

Same existence that creates beautiful,

small babies also creates mosquitoes,

flies as well as ... viruses and

bacterias than inflict and even kill

them.

 

[ Remember, a mosquitoes primarily

lives only by sucking blood of living

animals, many other animals survive

only by eating other living animals ... ]

 

Anybody, who attempts to accept only

one side of existence usually ends up

doing what ......

 

 

To really understand it, you have to understand

and answer ...

 

" WHERE DOES THE CONCEPT OF GOOD

and BAD RESIDES ??? " !

 

" WHO 'Judges' Good and Bad ??? "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

>

>Message: 3

> Fri, 06 May 2005 19:13:42 -0000

> " Durga " <durgaji108

>Golden Rule/Ahimsa/Nonviolence

>

>Most religions and spiritual teachings have as a part of their creed,

>the equivalent of the Goldent Rule which says:

> " Do unto others, as you would have done unto you. "

>

>But there is an addition to this saying, which is included in some

>eastern traditions. It says: " Don't do unto others what you would not

>want done to you. "

>

>That is ahimsa. That is nonviolence.

>

 

no, this is just common sense living.

 

non-violence as taught today is pacifism. that is the problem.

 

ahimsa used to have a deeper meaning, but that

has fallen almost out of normal usage. and it has been

replaced by these Gandhian meanings. Gandhi was

a politician pretending to be a saint.

 

unfortunately ahimsa has been another buzzword ...

another control structure.

 

any situation can only be evaluated and responded to

at that time in those contexts. these golden rules

are just seeds of more discord and control.

 

>

> >

> > " all this " works fine by itself. if i kept my mouth shut, nobody

>would miss

> > a thing.

>

>devi: harshaji is right...the Purusha/Self/Atman/the Supreme (as sri

>niz would say) is the ultimate form of non-violence..where does your

>negativity come from?

>

 

" it " needs no validation. whether from the ocean or from nonviolence.

 

" it " cannot be taught. all attempts to emulate " it " are

bound to end in fiasco.

 

as long as we understand that these concepts of ahimsa, tolerance etc

are just useful concepts for daily life, it is fine.

 

don't pretend nonviolence comes from, or is, the self. a blind is leading

another.

 

a person was walking around making " vroom

vroom " sounds. another asked him " what are you doing? " . so he

said " i am riding a motorcycle " .

the other person came behind him and sat down

as if sitting down on the seat and said

" lets ride it together " .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

devi: and did you realize the Self as moksha? kaivalya? do you even

know what those terms are?

you: a person was walking around making " vroom vroom " sounds. another

asked him " what are you doing? " . so he

said " i am riding a motorcycle " .

the other person came behind him and sat down

as if sitting down on the seat and said

" lets ride it together " .

devi: you don't know the Self so you think no one can...what arrogance

you have...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " hemant bhai " <hemantbhai100@h...>

wrote:

 

> a person was walking around making " vroom

> vroom " sounds. another asked him " what are you doing? " . so he

> said " i am riding a motorcycle " .

> the other person came behind him and sat down

> as if sitting down on the seat and said

> " lets ride it together " .

 

 

*************

Very good, excellent! Pretty funny, ain't it?

And that's exactly right, you hit the nail on the

head with all this bullshit seeking " god " or " whatever "

crap. Little kids playing " dress up " , that's all it is.

 

Judi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

ga

> >

> >

> > The belief in " others " ........is violence.

> >

> >

> >

> > toombaru

>

> devi: how so?

 

 

 

 

The assumption of autonomy is the ultimate land grab.

 

 

...........it is a violent tearing of the fabric.

 

 

That which was whole.......is ripped and torn to pieces.

 

 

" This " becomes " mine " ....and needs to be protected.....at any cost.

 

 

The horror of illusory separation.....creates a phantom.......that retreats to

its fetid little

house.....only to die alone..............whining about how cruel life is.

 

....it paints its walls with pretty pictures....sweetens all of its food......and

waits for the next

attack.

 

 

It talks of oceanic love...but will step over starving babies to sit with a guru

who it believes

can help it attain enlightenment.

 

 

It has no redeeming qualities.

 

 

It is a selfish....self-centered.......... little puke.

 

 

.....and you can be damn glad that it doesn't live very long.

 

 

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> wrote:

>

> devi: and did you realize the Self as moksha? kaivalya? do you even

> know what those terms are?

> you: a person was walking around making " vroom vroom " sounds. another

> asked him " what are you doing? " . so he

> said " i am riding a motorcycle " .

> the other person came behind him and sat down

> as if sitting down on the seat and said

> " lets ride it together " .

> devi: you don't know the Self so you think no one can...what arrogance

> you have...

 

ok so you know, guruji. tell me what does it have to do with nonviolence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

devi: oic...you have issues with *others*

 

 

 

 

> > > The belief in " others " ........is violence.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > toombaru

> >

> > devi: how so?

>

>

>

>

> The assumption of autonomy is the ultimate land grab.

>

>

> ..........it is a violent tearing of the fabric.

>

>

> That which was whole.......is ripped and torn to pieces.

>

>

> " This " becomes " mine " ....and needs to be protected.....at any cost.

>

>

> The horror of illusory separation.....creates a phantom.......that

retreats to its fetid little

> house.....only to die alone..............whining about how cruel

life is.

>

> ...it paints its walls with pretty pictures....sweetens all of its

food......and waits for the next

> attack.

>

>

> It talks of oceanic love...but will step over starving babies to

sit with a guru who it believes

> can help it attain enlightenment.

>

>

> It has no redeeming qualities.

>

>

> It is a selfish....self-centered.......... little puke.

>

>

> ....and you can be damn glad that it doesn't live very long.

>

>

>

>

> toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " hemantbhai100 "

<hemantbhai100@h...> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...>

wrote:

> >

> > devi: and did you realize the Self as moksha? kaivalya? do you

even

> > know what those terms are?

> > you: a person was walking around making " vroom vroom " sounds.

another

> > asked him " what are you doing? " . so he

> > said " i am riding a motorcycle " .

> > the other person came behind him and sat down

> > as if sitting down on the seat and said

> > " lets ride it together " .

> > devi: you don't know the Self so you think no one can...what

arrogance

> > you have...

>

> ok so you know, guruji. tell me what does it have to do with

nonviolence.

 

devi: i can't really remember what the original statement was,

guruji, can you remind me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

.......

 

 

 

D.: God being immanent in all, one

should not take life of any kind. Is

society right in taking the life of a

murderer? Can the State do so either?

The Christian countries begin to think

that it is wrong to do so.

 

M: What is it that prompted the

murderer to commit the crime?

 

The same power awards him the

punishment. Society or the State is

only a tool in the hands of the power.

You speak of one life taken away; But

what about innumerable lives lost in

wars?

 

 

 

D.: Quite so. Loss of lives is wrong

anyway. Are wars justified?

 

M: For a realized man, the one who

remains ever in the Self, the loss of

one or several or all lives either in

this world or in all the three worlds

makes no difference.

 

Even if he happens

to destroy them all, no sin can touch

such a pure soul.

 

Maharshi quoted the

Gita, Chapter 18, Verse 1 7 - " He who

is free from the notion of ego, whose

intellect is unattached, though he

annihilates all the worlds, he slayeth

not, nor is he bound by the results of

his actions. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...