Love, MS, Or BS?

[Guest guest]

P: But pray tell, loving Gene, how do you reconcile the above with

> > the Self=love? Could the Self be into SM? It would seem so, if

> > it were conscious and responsible for its actions. If suicide

> > bombers, and GB, and BTK are equally the SELF, we must

> > either conclude the Self doesn't know what goes on, or

> > it's not all that loving. Let's talk evil vs. love, if you are

game.

>=========================

gp: If I cannot get beyond the duality of evil and love then what am

I doing at this non-duality group? Buddha, Krishna and even Jesus

and Ramana did not see any difference between the saint and sinner

because to the Self there is none –

 

P: Are you on that same level with the holy dudes cited above, Gene?

Are you saying murder and helter skelter are OK?

 

GP: it is all just a Show, movie,

maya in which the sinner is a saint one minute so that in the next

he can be a criminal.

 

P: Is that you, Gene, are you a criminal? Do you actually know

anyone who is a saint one minute and a criminal the next, or is that

just your belief?

..

=============================

> >

> > PS. Are you related to the Pelota who discovered the

> > Pelota gene?

>

 

gp: Heh, I am the Pelota gene. Why the hell not. I'm everything else

in my dream.

 

 

P: Can you give straight answers, or you are just a platitude and

evasion specialist?

If you want to teach you have to do better than evade the soft balls.

If you step up to the plate, you have to swing the bat, chum.

==============================

> ***

>

> >Hey, Pete:

>

> Why do bad things happen to good people, eh? Oh, boy... here come

the

>======================

GP:Nisargadatta was all about Advaita, or am I in the wrong group?

 

P: LOL, now that you mention it, you belong with the 11 members of your

group. You need only one more Gene and we can crucified you. )

 

 

G: IN Advaita there is no doer. So there are no good people any more

than there are bad peoples. It's all just maya, entertainment as the

Self plays hide and seek with its imaginary doers.

 

P: Yep, No doer: Ramesh alibi to molest and defraud.

 

 

.. ie there is no doer.

> >theologians...

>

>

>

> fuzzie

>

> ****

>

> P: Indeed! Why?

>

> If there was a plan, or planner for life,

> why abandon the protophage feeding model of

> plants (which manufacture nutrients from

> sunlight, water and soil) in favor of the

> autophage in which animals feed on animals,

> and then evolve consciousness and pain to

> really rub it in. Doesn't this plan sounds a

> bit sadistic/masochistic?

==============================

Pelota Gene: Project this question into a dream and then ask the same

questions that you can then answer as another imaginary doer in your

dream in which you are all the imaginary doers. It is all just a play

of words, and their imaginary egos.

 

Its all about dreaming and the not-dreaming, the dreamless-sleep

called Samadhi.

 

an echo: It is all really very simple -- so simple that there is no

mind simple enough to understand it.

 

the Pelota Gene

===========================

P: You are the dreamer. You take your beliefs for reality. What

do you have to show besides beliefs? Any insights of your own?

Speak before the Ump yells,

STRike THREE!

>