Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 --- > > Hey there, Noel: > > I don't know who the self-righteous, condescending character > " haokeaio " is, but, in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching, just > do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I am " > all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just " this " . It > really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought patterns > or anything. It just is. > > fuzzie devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as the Self..right fuzzy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> wrote: > > --- > > > > > > Hey there, Noel: > > > > > > I don't know who the self-righteous, condescending character > > > " haokeaio " is, but, in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching, > > just > > > do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I > > am " > > > all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just " this " . It > > > really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought > > patterns > > > or anything. It just is. > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as > > the Self..right fuzzy? > > > Nothing remains. There is no knower. It just is. > > fuzzie Without a knower........it isn't toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 fuzzy:in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching, just do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I am " all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just " this " . It really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought patterns or anything. It just is. devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as the Self..right fuzzy? fuzzy:Nothing remains. There is no knower. It just is. devi: what just is....the Immortal Self? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> wrote: > > > --- > > > > > > > > Hey there, Noel: > > > > > > > > I don't know who the self-righteous, condescending character > > > > " haokeaio " is, but, in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching, > > > just > > > > do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I > > > am " > > > > all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just " this " . It > > > > really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought > > > patterns > > > > or anything. It just is. > > > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as > > > the Self..right fuzzy? > > > > > > Nothing remains. There is no knower. It just is. > > > > fuzzie > > > > > Without a knower........it isn't > > > toombaru How do you know? fuzzie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> > wrote: > > > Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> > wrote: > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Hey there, Noel: > > > > > > > > > > I don't know who the self-righteous, condescending character > > > > > " haokeaio " is, but, in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching, > > > > just > > > > > do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I > > > > am " > > > > > all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just > " this " . It > > > > > really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought > > > > patterns > > > > > or anything. It just is. > > > > > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > > > devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as > > > > the Self..right fuzzy? > > > > > > > > > Nothing remains. There is no knower. It just is. > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > > > > > Without a knower........it isn't > > > > > > toombaru > > How do you know? > > > > fuzzie There is a knowing............that no one knows. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > > > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> > > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> > > wrote: > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey there, Noel: > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know who the self-righteous, condescending character > > > > > > " haokeaio " is, but, in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching, > > > > > just > > > > > > do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I > > > > > am " > > > > > > all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just > > " this " . It > > > > > > really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought > > > > > patterns > > > > > > or anything. It just is. > > > > > > > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > > > > > devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as > > > > > the Self..right fuzzy? > > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing remains. There is no knower. It just is. > > > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Without a knower........it isn't > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > How do you know? > > > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > There is a knowing............that no one knows. > > > > toombaru Yes... a knowing by no one. fuzzie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2005 Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 - toombaru2004 Nisargadatta Monday, May 16, 2005 2:52 PM Re: I-I Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2004 " <cptc@w...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " fuzzie_wuz " <fuzzie_wuz> > wrote: > > > Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> > wrote: > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Hey there, Noel: > > > > > > > > > > I don't know who the self-righteous, condescending character > > > > > " haokeaio " is, but, in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching, > > > > just > > > > > do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I > > > > am " > > > > > all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just > " this " . It > > > > > really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought > > > > patterns > > > > > or anything. It just is. > > > > > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > > > devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as > > > > the Self..right fuzzy? > > > > > > > > > Nothing remains. There is no knower. It just is. > > > > > > fuzzie > > > > > > > > > > Without a knower........it isn't > > > > > > toombaru > > How do you know? > > > > fuzzie There is a knowing............that no one knows. toombaru NoOne is This Knowner....... Knowner....... Knowner................. ROFLMAO your ghostly apparition. anna ** If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription, sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups: /mygroups?edit=1 Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta group and click on Save Changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.