Interview

[Guest guest]

Lewis: That is your inference and interpretation of what was stated

for Dr. Theo's position.

 

P: As what you wrote is yours. No one knows what DR Theo really means,

unless you are him, which you were accused to be by Jody. But I don't

believe you are. So my guess is as good as yours, but

I thank you for what you wrote, and now I understand better your

opinion about what he wrote.

 

The funny part is, that most people think they understand what

language is, and how to use it, and what it represents, and academic

language only obscures the issue for the common man. So this issue

has to be put in the simplest terms for them and for the most

unfortunate, the Toombs of this world.

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote:

 

Lewis: That is your inference and interpretation of what was stated

for Dr. Theo's position.

 

P: As what you wrote is yours. No one knows what DR Theo really means,

unless you are him, which you were accused to be by Jody.

 

Lewis: Dr. Theo is a creation of mine like the others we had here,

including your characters, as devices for stimulating discussion. His

programming was limited but nonetheless valid as it goes. Did you know

Uncle Nagarjuna was his Godfather?

 

Dr. Theo was publicly outed here:

 

GuruRatings/message/55767

 

 

Pete: But I don't believe you are.

 

Lewis: That is correct. He is a creation, I am his " daddy, " a chip off

the old block and not the whole block.

 

Pete: So my guess is as good as yours, but I thank you for what you

wrote, and now I understand better your opinion about what he wrote.

 

Lewis: I am glad we communicated this one through.

 

Pete: The funny part is, that most people think they understand what

language is, and how to use it, and what it represents, and academic

language only obscures the issue for the common man. So this issue

has to be put in the simplest terms for them and for the most

unfortunate, the Toombs of this world.

[Guest guest]

> Pete: The funny part is, that most people think they understand what

> language is, and how to use it, and what it represents, and academic

> language only obscures the issue for the common man. So this issue

> has to be put in the simplest terms for them and for the most

> unfortunate, the Toombs of this world.

 

 

 

I am surprised how often the term " people " appears in yours and GP's

postings (among many other posters) the last time. People are this,

people are that! How intrguing! Is there something we can do about it

with the language of the common man? Or, just accept this profound

insights into what " people " is as a God-given gift?

 

cordially,

Kip Almazy