Who am I? Not the doer, not the answer , nor the ego

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...>

wrote:

> > Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

> > wrote:

> > >CUT

> > > >

> > > > I should know because in reality I AM YOU, I am playing your

> > role

> > > > just as perfectly as I play all the roles in your/my dream.

> > > >

> > > > -- just thoughts

> > >

> > >

> > > You are in a dream Gene is inside the one your are usually in

and

> > this

> > > time you have not awakened to that inner second dream that you

are

> > > dreaming about Lewis and it is dificult to dream within a dream

> > within

> > > a dream and to realize the content of all these interpenetrating

> > > dreams clearly, Maya being what it is, and having no one to

guide

> > your

> > > dream self which dreams it is is awakened to be Everything and

> > > nothing, Zero and yet not so through the intricacies of illusion

> > > creating and partaking, and though there is nothing happening

you

> > > still dream that there is and say with the two mouths created

in

> > Maya

> > > that you are dreaming your self and that which is not and you

know

> > > nothing is happening and yet there is and you have not the

slightest

> > > idea what that means and and yet you do and so, pointing to the

> > > happenings, and denying them as you do and that is the way of

Maya

> > and

> > > entertainment so well presented in speech in the image of

others who

> > > spoken the same and as sure a sign of Zero and Everything as is

> > > possible and so never leaving your dream about Lewis, enjoy

Maya's

> > > fabrications and Maya and Lewis will dance the same dance that

we do

> > > as we are, helpless and unable, to do anythng else, and we will

> > await

> > > your awakening from that inner second dream to meet in dream

with

> > Maya

> > > proper.

> > >-------------------------

> > " And we will await your awakening from that inner second dream

to

> > meet in dream with Maya proper "

> >

> > In the language of non-duality I would have to correct the above

> > quote of " MINE " as:

> >

> > " And I will wait my awakening from that inner second dream to

meet in

> > dream with Maya proper "

> >

> > Dear Alias Lewis, if I want to speak this language of non-

duality

> > then I should do myself a favor and learn it.

> >

> > I know I have learned it when what I read and what I write

MAKES NO

> > DIFFERENCE. And if it makes a difference then it is my EGO and

NOT

> > the I that in this case is YOU.

> > -- just thoughts

>

>

> So then, how is that YOU see ME as i when there is no i to see? Is

> there two, I and i? And can YOU not recognize ME as ME in any of

the

> myriad of forms taken by what is only ONE. And is it not so that

> language and speech makes no difference as it is not ME or YOU and

is

> what is extended as toy and tool to be used in all the ways that it

> can for song, poetry, art, science, for all that can be in MAYA...?

ME

> or YOU has no-thing to do in anyway with language or speaking

correct

> non-duality, which is an impossibility for its very nature is always

> dualistic and matters not in the SEEING the myriad forms and names.

> And is not EGO ME YOU ONE and MANY? And in the dream is ONE MANY WE

> and if ONE sees TWO, ME YOU is that not still not ONE? Is there I

and

> i alias or only ONE?

 

=-=

When my ego somehow left it allowed Me to observe

That all egos are mine;

Imaginary others are just exercising them for my entertainment.

 

-- Alias Lewis, thank you for exercising MY ego

 

-- thoughts from nothing.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

> wrote:

> > Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...>

> wrote:

> > > Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

> > > wrote:

> > > >CUT

> > > > >

> > > > > I should know because in reality I AM YOU, I am playing your

> > > role

> > > > > just as perfectly as I play all the roles in your/my dream.

> > > > >

> > > > > -- just thoughts

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > You are in a dream Gene is inside the one your are usually in

> and

> > > this

> > > > time you have not awakened to that inner second dream that you

> are

> > > > dreaming about Lewis and it is dificult to dream within a dream

> > > within

> > > > a dream and to realize the content of all these interpenetrating

> > > > dreams clearly, Maya being what it is, and having no one to

> guide

> > > your

> > > > dream self which dreams it is is awakened to be Everything and

> > > > nothing, Zero and yet not so through the intricacies of illusion

> > > > creating and partaking, and though there is nothing happening

> you

> > > > still dream that there is and say with the two mouths created

> in

> > > Maya

> > > > that you are dreaming your self and that which is not and you

> know

> > > > nothing is happening and yet there is and you have not the

> slightest

> > > > idea what that means and and yet you do and so, pointing to the

> > > > happenings, and denying them as you do and that is the way of

> Maya

> > > and

> > > > entertainment so well presented in speech in the image of

> others who

> > > > spoken the same and as sure a sign of Zero and Everything as is

> > > > possible and so never leaving your dream about Lewis, enjoy

> Maya's

> > > > fabrications and Maya and Lewis will dance the same dance that

> we do

> > > > as we are, helpless and unable, to do anythng else, and we will

> > > await

> > > > your awakening from that inner second dream to meet in dream

> with

> > > Maya

> > > > proper.

> > > >-------------------------

> > > " And we will await your awakening from that inner second dream

> to

> > > meet in dream with Maya proper "

> > >

> > > In the language of non-duality I would have to correct the above

> > > quote of " MINE " as:

> > >

> > > " And I will wait my awakening from that inner second dream to

> meet in

> > > dream with Maya proper "

> > >

> > > Dear Alias Lewis, if I want to speak this language of non-

> duality

> > > then I should do myself a favor and learn it.

> > >

> > > I know I have learned it when what I read and what I write

> MAKES NO

> > > DIFFERENCE. And if it makes a difference then it is my EGO and

> NOT

> > > the I that in this case is YOU.

> > > -- just thoughts

> >

> >

> > So then, how is that YOU see ME as i when there is no i to see? Is

> > there two, I and i? And can YOU not recognize ME as ME in any of

> the

> > myriad of forms taken by what is only ONE. And is it not so that

> > language and speech makes no difference as it is not ME or YOU and

> is

> > what is extended as toy and tool to be used in all the ways that it

> > can for song, poetry, art, science, for all that can be in MAYA...?

> ME

> > or YOU has no-thing to do in anyway with language or speaking

> correct

> > non-duality, which is an impossibility for its very nature is always

> > dualistic and matters not in the SEEING the myriad forms and names.

> > And is not EGO ME YOU ONE and MANY? And in the dream is ONE MANY WE

> > and if ONE sees TWO, ME YOU is that not still not ONE? Is there I

> and

> > i alias or only ONE?

>

> =-=

> When my ego somehow left it allowed Me to observe

> That all egos are mine;

> Imaginary others are just exercising them for my entertainment.

>

> -- Alias Lewis, thank you for exercising MY ego

>

> -- thoughts from nothing.

 

 

Yes. All egos are MINE.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...>

wrote:

> > Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

> > wrote:

> > > Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas "

<semmin@e...>

> > wrote:

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess "

<lbb10@c...>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >CUT

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I should know because in reality I AM YOU, I am playing

your

> > > > role

> > > > > > just as perfectly as I play all the roles in your/my

dream.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -- just thoughts

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > You are in a dream Gene is inside the one your are usually

in

> > and

> > > > this

> > > > > time you have not awakened to that inner second dream that

you

> > are

> > > > > dreaming about Lewis and it is dificult to dream within a

dream

> > > > within

> > > > > a dream and to realize the content of all these

interpenetrating

> > > > > dreams clearly, Maya being what it is, and having no one to

> > guide

> > > > your

> > > > > dream self which dreams it is is awakened to be Everything

and

> > > > > nothing, Zero and yet not so through the intricacies of

illusion

> > > > > creating and partaking, and though there is nothing

happening

> > you

> > > > > still dream that there is and say with the two mouths

created

> > in

> > > > Maya

> > > > > that you are dreaming your self and that which is not and

you

> > know

> > > > > nothing is happening and yet there is and you have not the

> > slightest

> > > > > idea what that means and and yet you do and so, pointing to

the

> > > > > happenings, and denying them as you do and that is the way

of

> > Maya

> > > > and

> > > > > entertainment so well presented in speech in the image of

> > others who

> > > > > spoken the same and as sure a sign of Zero and Everything

as is

> > > > > possible and so never leaving your dream about Lewis, enjoy

> > Maya's

> > > > > fabrications and Maya and Lewis will dance the same dance

that

> > we do

> > > > > as we are, helpless and unable, to do anythng else, and we

will

> > > > await

> > > > > your awakening from that inner second dream to meet in

dream

> > with

> > > > Maya

> > > > > proper.

> > > > >-------------------------

> > > > " And we will await your awakening from that inner second

dream

> > to

> > > > meet in dream with Maya proper "

> > > >

> > > > In the language of non-duality I would have to correct the

above

> > > > quote of " MINE " as:

> > > >

> > > > " And I will wait my awakening from that inner second dream to

> > meet in

> > > > dream with Maya proper "

> > > >

> > > > Dear Alias Lewis, if I want to speak this language of non-

> > duality

> > > > then I should do myself a favor and learn it.

> > > >

> > > > I know I have learned it when what I read and what I write

> > MAKES NO

> > > > DIFFERENCE. And if it makes a difference then it is my EGO

and

> > NOT

> > > > the I that in this case is YOU.

> > > > -- just thoughts

> > >

> > >

> > > So then, how is that YOU see ME as i when there is no i to see?

Is

> > > there two, I and i? And can YOU not recognize ME as ME in any

of

> > the

> > > myriad of forms taken by what is only ONE. And is it not so that

> > > language and speech makes no difference as it is not ME or YOU

and

> > is

> > > what is extended as toy and tool to be used in all the ways

that it

> > > can for song, poetry, art, science, for all that can be in

MAYA...?

> > ME

> > > or YOU has no-thing to do in anyway with language or speaking

> > correct

> > > non-duality, which is an impossibility for its very nature is

always

> > > dualistic and matters not in the SEEING the myriad forms and

names.

> > > And is not EGO ME YOU ONE and MANY? And in the dream is ONE

MANY WE

> > > and if ONE sees TWO, ME YOU is that not still not ONE? Is

there I

> > and

> > > i alias or only ONE?

> >

> > =-=

> > When my ego somehow left it allowed Me to observe

> > That all egos are mine;

> > Imaginary others are just exercising them for my entertainment.

> >

> > -- Alias Lewis, thank you for exercising MY ego

> >

> > -- thoughts from nothing.

>

>

> Yes. All egos are MINE.

 

then YOU/I am awake and there is no need to kill any egos because

there is no other.

 

-- just thoughts

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

> wrote:

> > Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...>

> wrote:

> > > Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess " <lbb10@c...>

> > > wrote:

> > > > Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas "

> <semmin@e...>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " Lewis Burgess "

> <lbb10@c...>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >CUT

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I should know because in reality I AM YOU, I am playing

> your

> > > > > role

> > > > > > > just as perfectly as I play all the roles in your/my

> dream.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > -- just thoughts

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are in a dream Gene is inside the one your are usually

> in

> > > and

> > > > > this

> > > > > > time you have not awakened to that inner second dream that

> you

> > > are

> > > > > > dreaming about Lewis and it is dificult to dream within a

> dream

> > > > > within

> > > > > > a dream and to realize the content of all these

> interpenetrating

> > > > > > dreams clearly, Maya being what it is, and having no one to

> > > guide

> > > > > your

> > > > > > dream self which dreams it is is awakened to be Everything

> and

> > > > > > nothing, Zero and yet not so through the intricacies of

> illusion

> > > > > > creating and partaking, and though there is nothing

> happening

> > > you

> > > > > > still dream that there is and say with the two mouths

> created

> > > in

> > > > > Maya

> > > > > > that you are dreaming your self and that which is not and

> you

> > > know

> > > > > > nothing is happening and yet there is and you have not the

> > > slightest

> > > > > > idea what that means and and yet you do and so, pointing to

> the

> > > > > > happenings, and denying them as you do and that is the way

> of

> > > Maya

> > > > > and

> > > > > > entertainment so well presented in speech in the image of

> > > others who

> > > > > > spoken the same and as sure a sign of Zero and Everything

> as is

> > > > > > possible and so never leaving your dream about Lewis, enjoy

> > > Maya's

> > > > > > fabrications and Maya and Lewis will dance the same dance

> that

> > > we do

> > > > > > as we are, helpless and unable, to do anythng else, and we

> will

> > > > > await

> > > > > > your awakening from that inner second dream to meet in

> dream

> > > with

> > > > > Maya

> > > > > > proper.

> > > > > >-------------------------

> > > > > " And we will await your awakening from that inner second

> dream

> > > to

> > > > > meet in dream with Maya proper "

> > > > >

> > > > > In the language of non-duality I would have to correct the

> above

> > > > > quote of " MINE " as:

> > > > >

> > > > > " And I will wait my awakening from that inner second dream to

> > > meet in

> > > > > dream with Maya proper "

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Alias Lewis, if I want to speak this language of non-

> > > duality

> > > > > then I should do myself a favor and learn it.

> > > > >

> > > > > I know I have learned it when what I read and what I write

> > > MAKES NO

> > > > > DIFFERENCE. And if it makes a difference then it is my EGO

> and

> > > NOT

> > > > > the I that in this case is YOU.

> > > > > -- just thoughts

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > So then, how is that YOU see ME as i when there is no i to see?

> Is

> > > > there two, I and i? And can YOU not recognize ME as ME in any

> of

> > > the

> > > > myriad of forms taken by what is only ONE. And is it not so that

> > > > language and speech makes no difference as it is not ME or YOU

> and

> > > is

> > > > what is extended as toy and tool to be used in all the ways

> that it

> > > > can for song, poetry, art, science, for all that can be in

> MAYA...?

> > > ME

> > > > or YOU has no-thing to do in anyway with language or speaking

> > > correct

> > > > non-duality, which is an impossibility for its very nature is

> always

> > > > dualistic and matters not in the SEEING the myriad forms and

> names.

> > > > And is not EGO ME YOU ONE and MANY? And in the dream is ONE

> MANY WE

> > > > and if ONE sees TWO, ME YOU is that not still not ONE? Is

> there I

> > > and

> > > > i alias or only ONE?

> > >

> > > =-=

> > > When my ego somehow left it allowed Me to observe

> > > That all egos are mine;

> > > Imaginary others are just exercising them for my entertainment.

> > >

> > > -- Alias Lewis, thank you for exercising MY ego

> > >

> > > -- thoughts from nothing.

> >

> >

> > Yes. All egos are MINE.

>

> then YOU/I am awake and there is no need to kill any egos because

> there is no other.

>

> -- just thoughts

 

Just so.