miracle Suspicion--- Science & Spiritual knowledge

[Guest guest]

I. Spiritual Knowledge - Concepts Of Science

 

 

 

1

 

Science is the logical analysis of the items existing in this creation based on

only one authority that is perception (Pratyaksha Pramanam). Even in the ancient

logic, all the authorities (Pramanas) are based on perception only. You see the

fire giving smoke. This is deduction or perception. When you see the smoke

coming from a distance and do not see the fire, you say that fire exists there

and this is induction or inference (Anumana Pramanam). But this induction is

based on your previous deduction only. Somebody says to you that fire gives

smoke. If that person is your dearest, you believe it and infer the fire from

the smoke. This is authority of word ‘Shabdha Pramanam’.

 

 

 

Though you have not seen the fire, your dearest person has seen the smoke

coming from fire. Like this all the authorities are based on perception only. I

do not find any scripture of any Religion, which contradicts the experience of

perception. There are four ways of authority. 1) Sruthi, which is the original

scripture. 2) Smrithi, which is the commentaries of Scholars on the original

scripture. 3) Yukthi, the logical analysis based on deduction, induction etc.,

4) Anubhava, the experience based on the perception of the items in this world,

which may be direct or indirect. Out of these four ways, the fourth way is the

most powerful. If anything contradicts the fourth way, that is not valid or it

may be a misinterpretation based on misunderstanding of the Sruthi or Smrithi or

Yukthi. Thus Science and Philosophy are not separate. The very frame of the

spiritual knowledge is Science only. Thus Science is the basic foundation and

over all underlying structure of all the Scriptures.

 

 

 

A true Scientist should always stand on the perception and should not deny the

experience derived by perception. If he denies, he is not a scientist. All top

most scientists were philosophers and spiritual people only. Those scientists

have travelled along the river of Science and reached its end, which is the

ocean of spiritual knowledge called as philosophy. Philosophy is pervading all

the branches of Science. Every branch of Science gives Ph.D as the final degree.

Ph.D means Doctor in Philosophy. If Science and Philosophy are different, why

this word Philosophy is regarded so much by all the branches of Science?

Philosophy means the essence of the knowledge of every branch that is

experienced when one reaches the end of that branch.

 

 

 

Therefore, the spiritual knowledge, which is the ocean is the Philosophy in

which all branches of Science and all the Religions merge and loose their

identity. A scientist who has not reached the end of Science and who is still

travelling in the river only denies the existence of the ocean, since he is

still perceiving the limiting boundaries of his knowledge – river. Such

river-travellers are called as atheists. They neither see the ocean nor see the

other rivers. Even the follower of any particular Religion is in the state of

this atheist only. He is no better than these atheists because he believes that

God is a particular form only, which is a small part of this creation. Some

other followers believe God as formless, who is the all-pervading cosmic energy.

Since cosmic energy is also a part of the creation, their form of God is very

big. These atheist-scientist believe that this creation is God. Thus all these

are atheists only. All these atheists, who may be scientific atheists

or religious atheists, will realize the true nature of God only when they reach

the end of the Science or Religion.

 

 

 

A scientific atheist is contradicting his own authority, which is the

perception. When the human incarnation performs the inexplicable miracles, how

can they deny the perception of such miracles? You may do that miracle in an

alternative way, but that does not contradict the different path of the original

miracle. One may get first class by copying. Such false first class cannot

contradict the genuine first class. The result is same, but the process is

different. You may produce ash by putting a fine powder of wet salt in the grews

of your hand like a magician. The same ash may be produced by a divine miracle

also. Since the result is same, can you argue that the process also should be

same? Since the first class result is same in the case of the original student

and a fraud student, do you mean that the hard work of the original student is

fraud?

 

 

 

Do you mean that the original and fraud students are one and the same?

Therefore, the same result can have two different processes. Since the result is

same, processes need not be same. Do you mean that a result has only one

process? Is it not contradicting the very fundamentals of Science? A Chemical

compound can be produced in several ways (Hess Law). Since the compound is same,

do you mean that the alternative reactions are also one and the same? Same

Chennai city can be reached by several ways. Since the end City is same, do you

mean that all the paths are not different? Do you mean that all the paths are

merged as one path only and thus there is only one path to reach the Chennai

city? Therefore, conservative scientists and conservative religious followers

can be categorized as immature analysts. The immaturity indicates their position

in the river and maturity indicates their position in the end of the river,

which is the ocean. Einstein, Newton, Heisenberg etc., are the top

most scientists who have travelled and travelled along the Science River and

reached the final spiritual ocean.

 

 

 

at the lotus feet of shri datta swami

 

surya

 

 

Gene Polotas <semmin wrote:

Physics tells us that when waves/particles slow down they turn into

probability-clouds. And so the closer we try to get to particles the

more they vanish into probability-clouds. Similarly, the faster we

try and chase light the more obvious it gets that we are standing

still.

 

The only explanation for this is that these particles/waves are

just thoughts, as is space and time.

A story of thoughts.

As with the study of particles/waves, there is a problem observing

thoughts.

 

In the same way physics' particles cannot be observed (because

they turn into probability clouds) so too the mind's thoughts

cannot be observed because they are never there. This must sound

insane. But it is no more insane than physics' probability-clouds.

 

The only difference between observing particles and observing

thoughts is that it takes a physicist and lots of fancy equipment to

observe particles. It takes nothing, not even effort, for anyone to

observe thoughts.

 

 

SURYA

surya

www.universal-spirituality.org

 

 

 

for Good

Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.