Guest guest Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Luke—14:26 to 27 [Mathew: - 11:34 to 38] “If any one comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple’’. The knowledge is compared to a sword. Bhagavatgita says “Chhitva Jnanasinatmanah”. This means that the ignorance should be cut by the knowledge, which is like a sword. The bonds with wife or husband and children are due to ignorance. Such bonds should break when the Lord in human form competes with them to conduct His test. Lord comes in human form in every human generation to preach and give His direct presence. If the Lord comes in only one human generation, God becomes partial to that human generation because other human generations are not blessed with such opportunity. To see, to touch, to talk and to live with the human incarnation, He comes down as per the prayers of the devotees. The Lord comes to preach and so He will not enter the statues or animals or birds. Veda says “Na tasya pratima asti’’ which means that God will not enter the inert statues. Gita says “Manusheem tanu masritam” which means that God enters the human body only because the main purpose is to preach the human beings. Gita strongly says that he who worships the inert statues will be born as an inert stone (“Bhootani yanti”). The Christians should be commended on this point who are worshipping the Holy Jesus only, who is the most powerful human incarnation of God. Veda says “Na tat samah” which means that nobody and nothing should be equal to the Lord in human incarnation. One should leave everything and everybody for the sake of the Lord in human form. Only the bond with a new human being can break the bond with the human beings. Such new human being must be very powerful who can be only God in human form. A new bond existing with formless God or statues cannot break the human bonds. Only the bond with another living being can cut the bond with the living beings. The bond with formless God is impossible. The bond with inert statue has no use. The above statements of Holy Jesus indicate that one should cut the bonds with his family and with the wealth. In Hindu religion also it is said that God (Datta) cuts all the bonds of family and wealth (“Dattam Chinnam”). Even the bond with the body should be cut for the sake of the God. Gita says the same thing as “Mat Gata Pranah”. Holy Jesus says that one has to carry his own cross (death) for the sake of the Lord. This means that one has to invite his own death with his own hands for the sake of God. Holy Jesus did like this as an ideal example for others. This means that you have to cut your bonds not only with your family and wealth but also with your life if necessary. at the lotus feet of shri datta swami surya www.universal-spirituality.org dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33 wrote: many concepts about (unconditionnel) love many egos who feel This love This love has no ego and therefor infinite, changeless, formless to love the forms..is to love an illusion to love the forms..is to love dreams to be love...is liberation Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> wrote: > > Namaste, why should anybody follow Jesus if he/she has no (more) " conflict " with all ( " others " )....and so, live in peace and harmony ...? to solve the " conflict of bonds " ....first it's necessary to know the reason why this " conflicts exists " sure, a serious " seeker " need some " independence " in order to follow own " inspiration and intiution " .... to " see " the Self in oneself some leave whole family for this reason..... " others " followed Jesus....and still there are many " who " follow him......in a " formless being " does love have a " form " ? Regards and peace thank you for the message Marc > Luke—14:26 to 27 [Mathew: - 11:34 to 38] > > " If any one comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple''. > > > > The knowledge is compared to a sword. Bhagavatgita says " Chhitva Jnanasinatmanah " . This means that the ignorance should be cut by the knowledge, which is like a sword. The bonds with wife or husband and children are due to ignorance. Such bonds should break when the Lord in human form competes with them to conduct His test. Lord comes in human form in every human generation to preach and give His direct presence. If the Lord comes in only one human generation, God becomes partial to that human generation because other human generations are not blessed with such opportunity. To see, to touch, to talk and to live with the human incarnation, He comes down as per the prayers of the devotees. The Lord comes to preach and so He will not enter the statues or animals or birds. Veda says " Na tasya pratima asti'' which means that God will not enter the inert statues. > > > > Gita says " Manusheem tanu masritam " which means that God enters the human body only because the main purpose is to preach the human beings. Gita strongly says that he who worships the inert statues will be born as an inert stone ( " Bhootani yanti " ). The Christians should be commended on this point who are worshipping the Holy Jesus only, who is the most powerful human incarnation of God. Veda says " Na tat samah " which means that nobody and nothing should be equal to the Lord in human incarnation. One should leave everything and everybody for the sake of the Lord in human form. Only the bond with a new human being can break the bond with the human beings. Such new human being must be very powerful who can be only God in human form. > > > > A new bond existing with formless God or statues cannot break the human bonds. Only the bond with another living being can cut the bond with the living beings. The bond with formless God is impossible. The bond with inert statue has no use. The above statements of Holy Jesus indicate that one should cut the bonds with his family and with the wealth. In Hindu religion also it is said that God (Datta) cuts all the bonds of family and wealth ( " Dattam Chinnam " ). Even the bond with the body should be cut for the sake of the God. Gita says the same thing as " Mat Gata Pranah " . Holy Jesus says that one has to carry his own cross (death) for the sake of the Lord. This means that one has to invite his own death with his own hands for the sake of God. Holy Jesus did like this as an ideal example for others. This means that you have to cut your bonds not only with your family and wealth but also with your life if necessary. > > > > at the lotus feet of shri datta swami > > surya > > www.universal-spirituality.org > > > > > dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> wrote: > many concepts about (unconditionnel) love > many egos who feel This love > > This love has no ego > and therefor infinite, changeless, formless > > to love the forms..is to love an illusion > to love the forms..is to love dreams > > to be love...is liberation > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 dear friend love is expressed by serving which consists of spending money & physically doing work. The following throws some more light on this aspect. Today, in the world everybody agrees that the real power is the money only. Money is the fruit of work and Bhagavatgita calls sacrifice of money “Karma Phala Tyaga”. In Bhagavatgita it is said “Dhyanat Karma Phala Tyagah” which means that devotion is greater than Knowledge and sacrifice of the fruit of the work (money) is greater than the devotion. Knowledge consists of intelligence and words. Devotion consists of mind and words. Sacrifice consists of heart and love. The proof of the love is the practical service, which is the practical sacrifice of work or money. For the propagation of the divine knowledge and devotion the money is needed to publish the gospel in the form of books. When you sacrifice your money for the divine work your treasure in the heaven is built up. This means that God will help you after your death and you will enter the kingdom of God. You are giving your earnings to your family only and so your real love is on your family only. There is no need of any further argument on this point because it is very clear proof. This is the real fire test for your love. You are sacrificing valueless words and valueless mind in leisure, which is valueless time. This cannot prove the real value of God. You must give real value to God. You are finishing your prayers and meditation on God as soon as the time to go to job is nearing. Similarly when some work for the family is approaching, you are immediately leaving the presence of God. Therefore you are not giving any value to God for all practical purpose. But you are telling lies in your prayers that God is everything for you. The money is the final test and it can be the only test also since all the family is associated with you for money only and the family serves you in your old age for your money only. If the money is sacrificed to God your real color of love can be seen. at the lotus feet of shri datta swami surya www.universal-spirituality.org dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33 wrote: Namaste, why should anybody follow Jesus if he/she has no (more) " conflict " with all ( " others " )....and so, live in peace and harmony ...? to solve the " conflict of bonds " ....first it's necessary to know the reason why this " conflicts exists " sure, a serious " seeker " need some " independence " in order to follow own " inspiration and intiution " .... to " see " the Self in oneself some leave whole family for this reason..... " others " followed Jesus....and still there are many " who " follow him......in a " formless being " does love have a " form " ? Regards and peace thank you for the message Marc Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> wrote: > > > dear friend > > > > love is expressed by serving which consists of spending money & physically doing work. The following throws some more light on this aspect. > > > > Today, in the world everybody agrees that the real power is the money only. Money is the fruit of work and Bhagavatgita calls sacrifice of money " Karma Phala Tyaga " . In Bhagavatgita it is said " Dhyanat Karma Phala Tyagah " which means that devotion is greater than Knowledge and sacrifice of the fruit of the work (money) is greater than the devotion. Knowledge consists of intelligence and words. Devotion consists of mind and words. Sacrifice consists of heart and love. The proof of the love is the practical service, which is the practical sacrifice of work or money. For the propagation of the divine knowledge and devotion the money is needed to publish the gospel in the form of books. When you sacrifice your money for the divine work your treasure in the heaven is built up. This means that God will help you after your death and you will enter the kingdom of God. > > > > You are giving your earnings to your family only and so your real love is on your family only. There is no need of any further argument on this point because it is very clear proof. This is the real fire test for your love. You are sacrificing valueless words and valueless mind in leisure, which is valueless time. This cannot prove the real value of God. You must give real value to God. You are finishing your prayers and meditation on God as soon as the time to go to job is nearing. Similarly when some work for the family is approaching, you are immediately leaving the presence of God. Therefore you are not giving any value to God for all practical purpose. But you are telling lies in your prayers that God is everything for you. The money is the final test and it can be the only test also since all the family is associated with you for money only and the family serves you in your old age for your money only. If the money is sacrificed to God your real color of love can > be seen. > > > > at the lotus feet of shri datta swami > > surya > > www.universal-spirituality.org " No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money. " -- Matthew 6:24 (New International Version) " But he who performs his prescribed duty only because it ought to be done, and renounces all attachment to the fruit--his renunciation is of the nature of goodness, O Arjuna. " -- Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 18, Verse 9 This means that we should drop our attachments to money and also our attachments to other possessions, such as family members, friends, material possessions, personal social status and reputation, mental ideas about one's physical body and so on. Why? Because all of that is merely mental images. The map is not the territory. And why do you need a map to find yourself?! al. > > > > > dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> wrote: > Namaste, > > why should anybody follow Jesus if he/she has no (more) " conflict " > with all ( " others " )....and so, live in peace and harmony ...? > > to solve the " conflict of bonds " ....first it's necessary to know the reason why this " conflicts exists " > sure, a serious " seeker " need some " independence " in order to follow own " inspiration and intiution " .... > to " see " the Self in oneself > some leave whole family for this reason..... > " others " followed Jesus....and still there are many " who " follow him......in a " formless being " > does love have a " form " ? > > Regards and peace > thank you for the message > Marc > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 Sacrificing the ambition on the fruit of the work is sufficient. It is not necessary to sacrifice the fruit of the work as per Gita. Is it not correct? A) In the very beginning itself (second Adhyaya) Gita says that the fruit of the work must be sacrificed (Karmajam Buddhi Yuktahi Phalam Tyaktva Maneeshinah). This means that realized scholars sacrifice the fruit of the work. Gita keeps sacrifice of the fruit of the work on the top most level (Dhyanath Karma Phala Tyagah). According to Veda sacrifice of fruit of work means sacrifice of money only (Dhanena Tyagenaike). Karma Phalam means self-earned money with which the man is more attached. Reason for the inability to do the sacrifice of fruit of work (Karma Phala Tyaga) is the selfish ambition for the fruit of the work. Therefore if the selfish ambition is removed, the fruit of the work can be easily sacrificed. It is funny to enjoy the fruit of work and say that he has no ambition for the fruit of the work. In such case you must also enjoy the fruit of your sin in the hell i.e., cutting of your muscles by knife etc., without any selfish ambition. Saktuprastha was tested in the sacrifice of the fruit of the work, which alone can prove the lack of selfish ambition for the fruit of the work. If one says that he has sacrificed the ambition for the fruit of the work and yet, enjoys the fruit of work is trying to fool the author of Gita. In turn the Lord will fool him in the hell. at the lotus feet of shri datta swami surya www.universal-spirituality.org anders_lindman <anders_lindman wrote: This means that we should drop our attachments to money and also our attachments to other possessions, such as family members, friends, material possessions, personal social status and reputation, mental ideas about one's physical body and so on. Why? Because all of that is merely mental images. The map is not the territory. And why do you need a map to find yourself?! SURYA surya www.universal-spirituality.org Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> wrote: > hello, didn't know that love could be in direct relation with money...in the mind of a spiritual person would like to thank Gene for the interesting and detailed answer to your " dream, only love - Jesus " message Regards and peace Marc > > dear friend > > > > love is expressed by serving which consists of spending money & physically doing work. The following throws some more light on this aspect. > > > > Today, in the world everybody agrees that the real power is the money only. Money is the fruit of work and Bhagavatgita calls sacrifice of money " Karma Phala Tyaga " . In Bhagavatgita it is said " Dhyanat Karma Phala Tyagah " which means that devotion is greater than Knowledge and sacrifice of the fruit of the work (money) is greater than the devotion. Knowledge consists of intelligence and words. Devotion consists of mind and words. Sacrifice consists of heart and love. The proof of the love is the practical service, which is the practical sacrifice of work or money. For the propagation of the divine knowledge and devotion the money is needed to publish the gospel in the form of books. When you sacrifice your money for the divine work your treasure in the heaven is built up. This means that God will help you after your death and you will enter the kingdom of God. > > > > You are giving your earnings to your family only and so your real love is on your family only. There is no need of any further argument on this point because it is very clear proof. This is the real fire test for your love. You are sacrificing valueless words and valueless mind in leisure, which is valueless time. This cannot prove the real value of God. You must give real value to God. You are finishing your prayers and meditation on God as soon as the time to go to job is nearing. Similarly when some work for the family is approaching, you are immediately leaving the presence of God. Therefore you are not giving any value to God for all practical purpose. But you are telling lies in your prayers that God is everything for you. The money is the final test and it can be the only test also since all the family is associated with you for money only and the family serves you in your old age for your money only. If the money is sacrificed to God your real color of love can > be seen. > > > > at the lotus feet of shri datta swami > > surya > > www.universal-spirituality.org > > > > > dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> wrote: > Namaste, > > why should anybody follow Jesus if he/she has no (more) " conflict " > with all ( " others " )....and so, live in peace and harmony ...? > > to solve the " conflict of bonds " ....first it's necessary to know the reason why this " conflicts exists " > sure, a serious " seeker " need some " independence " in order to follow own " inspiration and intiution " .... > to " see " the Self in oneself > some leave whole family for this reason..... > " others " followed Jesus....and still there are many " who " follow him......in a " formless being " > does love have a " form " ? > > Regards and peace > thank you for the message > Marc > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 Even if your son is well settled and is the owner of ten self-earned houses, you are sacrificing your house to your son only even though he is not in need of it. You are not sacrificing your house to an outsider even though he is in need of it. Therefore, need is not the criterion. Your sacrifice of your house is a spontaneous expression of your love towards your son. Similarly, in case of Satguru or God, the same concept is applied. The concept of Guru Dakshina comes as sacrifice of the fruit of your work to Satguru or God. This is the path and actually and this is only the path as said in Veda ‘Dhanena Tyagenaikena…’. This is a big bomb for all the intellectual selfish people who tried to misinterpret this text in opposite sense by inserting the word ‘na’ before the word ‘Dhanena ..’. But, the same concept was repeatedly stressed in Gita as sacrifice of fruit of work (Karma phala tyaga). These intellectuals could not misinterpret Gita because the concept was repeated. The main point is that the sacrifice of fruit is the real expression or sign of spontaneous true love. You are sacrificing all your wealth, which is the accumulated fruit of your work to your children. If you are not a householder or if you are a poor householder, atleast you will sacrifice the work (Karma sanyasa). In such case, your work, (a form of energy) is the fruit, (matter) since matter and energy are inter-convertible forms. Sacrifice of words, mental feelings and intellectual discussions is not done in the case of your children. Therefore, you yourself gave the proof of a real love and you yourself cannot contradict it. You are also sure that your love on your children is true and is not false. Therefore, I am extending your own concept to God. Your true love on God can be proved only by the sacrifice of work and fruit of work. Now, you cannot contradict your own concept and say that sacrifice of words, mind and intelligence to God is real love. You cannot say that since children need money, it is given to them and since God does not need money, it need not be given to God. at the lotus feet of shri datta swami surya www.universal-spirituality.org dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33 wrote: Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> wrote: > hello, didn't know that love could be in direct relation with money...in the mind of a spiritual person would like to thank Gene for the interesting and detailed answer to your " dream, only love - Jesus " message Regards and peace Marc SURYA surya www.universal-spirituality.org Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> wrote: Hello, if your heart would be filled up with love (God)....then maybe you could " see " God in ....all in all how to fill up your heart with love? in sacrifice of whole of you®...(ego-mind) but up to you..... true...some people feel more free if they sacrifice many things (and money) to...... " whoever " ... if you feel free to give all to your Guru....do it.... but don't espect everybody should do same you talk about " selfish intellectuel " people..... yes....often such people have endless attachments to " money " ...and so also problems to get detached from it....and so tend to follow people and theories.....who/which give some help to this detachments.... nobody ever can escape God........ who's home is the heart of everybody Regards and love Marc > > Even if your son is well settled and is the owner of ten self- earned houses, you are sacrificing your house to your son only even though he is not in need of it. You are not sacrificing your house to an outsider even though he is in need of it. Therefore, need is not the criterion. Your sacrifice of your house is a spontaneous expression of your love towards your son. Similarly, in case of Satguru or God, the same concept is applied. > > > > The concept of Guru Dakshina comes as sacrifice of the fruit of your work to Satguru or God. This is the path and actually and this is only the path as said in Veda `Dhanena Tyagenaikena…'. This is a big bomb for all the intellectual selfish people who tried to misinterpret this text in opposite sense by inserting the word `na' before the word `Dhanena ..'. But, the same concept was repeatedly stressed in Gita as sacrifice of fruit of work (Karma phala tyaga). These intellectuals could not misinterpret Gita because the concept was repeated. > > > > The main point is that the sacrifice of fruit is the real expression or sign of spontaneous true love. You are sacrificing all your wealth, which is the accumulated fruit of your work to your children. If you are not a householder or if you are a poor householder, atleast you will sacrifice the work (Karma sanyasa). In such case, your work, (a form of energy) is the fruit, (matter) since matter and energy are inter-convertible forms. Sacrifice of words, mental feelings and intellectual discussions is not done in the case of your children. Therefore, you yourself gave the proof of a real love and you yourself cannot contradict it. You are also sure that your love on your children is true and is not false. Therefore, I am extending your own concept to God. > > > > Your true love on God can be proved only by the sacrifice of work and fruit of work. Now, you cannot contradict your own concept and say that sacrifice of words, mind and intelligence to God is real love. You cannot say that since children need money, it is given to them and since God does not need money, it need not be given to God. > > > > at the lotus feet of shri datta swami > > surya > > www.universal-spirituality.org dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> wrote: > Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> > wrote: > > > hello, > > didn't know that love could be in direct relation with money...in the mind of a spiritual person > > would like to thank Gene for the interesting and detailed answer to your " dream, only love - Jesus " message > > Regards and peace > Marc > > > SURYA > surya@u... > www.universal-spirituality.org > > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> wrote: > > > Sacrificing the ambition on the fruit of the work is sufficient. It is not necessary to sacrifice the fruit of the work as per Gita. Is it not correct? > > > > A) In the very beginning itself (second Adhyaya) Gita says that the fruit of the work must be sacrificed (Karmajam Buddhi Yuktahi Phalam Tyaktva Maneeshinah). This means that realized scholars sacrifice the fruit of the work. Gita keeps sacrifice of the fruit of the work on the top most level (Dhyanath Karma Phala Tyagah). According to Veda sacrifice of fruit of work means sacrifice of money only (Dhanena Tyagenaike). Karma Phalam means self-earned money with which the man is more attached. Reason for the inability to do the sacrifice of fruit of work (Karma Phala Tyaga) is the selfish ambition for the fruit of the work. Therefore if the selfish ambition is removed, the fruit of the work can be easily sacrificed. > > > > It is funny to enjoy the fruit of work and say that he has no ambition for the fruit of the work. In such case you must also enjoy the fruit of your sin in the hell i.e., cutting of your muscles by knife etc., without any selfish ambition. Saktuprastha was tested in the sacrifice of the fruit of the work, which alone can prove the lack of selfish ambition for the fruit of the work. If one says that he has sacrificed the ambition for the fruit of the work and yet, enjoys the fruit of work is trying to fool the author of Gita. In turn the Lord will fool him in the hell. > > > > at the lotus feet of shri datta swami > > surya > > www.universal-spirituality.org Without looking into any scriptures, I would say yes to the idea that sacrificing the ambition on the fruit of the work is sufficient. The ambition is part of the map. We don't need to throw away the map. A map can be useful sometimes. The entire future is nothing but a mental map. Problems arise when we take the map as being more important than the territory. Then there is conflict. Can you imagine the relief it must be to not have to carry that heavy map of the future all the time! We cannot find God in a map. God is now and only now. Attachments of any kind, such as ambitions, goals, possessions of money, material things, personal relationships, social status e t c are always only a map. We may think that our money is more than a map, and that our wife, husband or children are more than a map. But they are not! There are indeed physical reality to your money and your family, but your ATTACHMENTS to these " things " are only a map. Why do we need to cling to ANYTHING? Drop EVERYTHING and taste the real fruits in the living moment. Stop chewing on a mental MAP!!! :-) al. > > > > anders_lindman <anders_lindman> wrote: > This means that we should drop our attachments to money and also our attachments to other possessions, such as family members, friends, material possessions, personal social status and reputation, mental ideas about one's physical body and so on. Why? Because all of that is merely mental images. The map is not the territory. And why do you need a map to find yourself?! > > > SURYA > surya@u... > www.universal-spirituality.org > > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , prakki surya <dattapr2000> > wrote: > > > > hello, > > didn't know that love could be in direct relation with money...in the > mind of a spiritual person > > would like to thank Gene for the interesting and detailed answer to > your " dream, only love - Jesus " message > > Regards and peace > > Marc Money in itself could be handled with love. It is the DEVOTION to money that is the problem. Such devotion is only a mental image, a mental attachment creating insecurity, inflated sense of a mental map, struggle, defensiveness e t c. Don't drop your money. Drop your ATTACHMENT to your money. Consciously or subconsciously we carry our money with us ALL THE TIME (psychologically speaking). That is a CRAMP!!! A neurosis. al. > > > > dear friend > > > > > > > > love is expressed by serving which consists of spending money & > physically doing work. The following throws some more light on this > aspect. > > > > > > > > Today, in the world everybody agrees that the real power is the > money only. Money is the fruit of work and Bhagavatgita calls > sacrifice of money " Karma Phala Tyaga " . In Bhagavatgita it is > said " Dhyanat Karma Phala Tyagah " which means that devotion is > greater than Knowledge and sacrifice of the fruit of the work (money) > is greater than the devotion. Knowledge consists of intelligence and > words. Devotion consists of mind and words. Sacrifice consists of > heart and love. The proof of the love is the practical service, > which is the practical sacrifice of work or money. For the > propagation of the divine knowledge and devotion the money is needed > to publish the gospel in the form of books. When you sacrifice your > money for the divine work your treasure in the heaven is built up. > This means that God will help you after your death and you will enter > the kingdom of God. > > > > > > > > You are giving your earnings to your family only and so your real > love is on your family only. There is no need of any further > argument on this point because it is very clear proof. This is the > real fire test for your love. You are sacrificing valueless words > and valueless mind in leisure, which is valueless time. This cannot > prove the real value of God. You must give real value to God. You > are finishing your prayers and meditation on God as soon as the time > to go to job is nearing. Similarly when some work for the family is > approaching, you are immediately leaving the presence of God. > Therefore you are not giving any value to God for all practical > purpose. But you are telling lies in your prayers that God is > everything for you. The money is the final test and it can be the > only test also since all the family is associated with you for money > only and the family serves you in your old age for your money only. > If the money is sacrificed to God your real color of love can > > be seen. > > > > > > > > at the lotus feet of shri datta swami > > > > surya > > > > www.universal-spirituality.org > > > > > > > > > > dennis_travis33 <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Namaste, > > > > why should anybody follow Jesus if he/she has no (more) " conflict " > > with all ( " others " )....and so, live in peace and harmony ...? > > > > to solve the " conflict of bonds " ....first it's necessary to know > the reason why this " conflicts exists " > > sure, a serious " seeker " need some " independence " in order to > follow own " inspiration and intiution " .... > > to " see " the Self in oneself > > some leave whole family for this reason..... > > " others " followed Jesus....and still there are many " who " follow > him......in a " formless being " > > does love have a " form " ? > > > > Regards and peace > > thank you for the message > > Marc > > > > > > Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2005 Report Share Posted October 12, 2005 Sacrificing the ambition on the fruit of the work is sufficient. It is not necessary to sacrifice the fruit of the work as per Gita. Is it not correct? A) In the very beginning itself (second Adhyaya) Gita says that the fruit of the work must be sacrificed (Karmajam Buddhi Yuktahi Phalam Tyaktva Maneeshinah). This means that realized scholars sacrifice the fruit of the work. Gita keeps sacrifice of the fruit of the work on the top most level (Dhyanath Karma Phala Tyagah). According to Veda sacrifice of fruit of work means sacrifice of money only (Dhanena Tyagenaike). Karma Phalam means self-earned money with which the man is more attached. Reason for the inability to do the sacrifice of fruit of work (Karma Phala Tyaga) is the selfish ambition for the fruit of the work. Therefore if the selfish ambition is removed, the fruit of the work can be easily sacrificed. It is funny to enjoy the fruit of work and say that he has no ambition for the fruit of the work. In such case you must also enjoy the fruit of your sin in the hell i.e., cutting of your muscles by knife etc., without any selfish ambition. Saktuprastha was tested in the sacrifice of the fruit of the work, which alone can prove the lack of selfish ambition for the fruit of the work. If one says that he has sacrificed the ambition for the fruit of the work and yet, enjoys the fruit of work is trying to fool the author of Gita. In turn the Lord will fool him in the hell. at the lotus feet of shri datta swami surya anders_lindman <anders_lindman wrote: Don't drop your money. Drop your ATTACHMENT to your money. Consciously or subconsciously we carry our money with us ALL THE TIME (psychologically speaking). That is a CRAMP!!! A neurosis. SURYA surya www.universal-spirituality.org Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.