Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

the SELF personified as Anna

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote:

>

> I have a problem, Gene, 'you' are another name for/of me....

>

> he he, so, are you going to concede?

>

> The Joy that I Am....==========================

 

We are all the same Consciousness that uses different aliases for the

JOY that it is.

This Alias mind and its body called " I " has to play its role in life

just as perfectly as Consciousness plays your Anna role perfectly.

 

If this Alias called I had any choice then I would have drowned in

Consciousness long ago to leave all this f'iction far behind.

LOVE

 

 

 

> -

> Gene Polotas

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, October 17, 2005 12:13 PM

> the SELF personified

>

>

> Compared to ME Jesus, Buddha and Ramana were ego maniacs.

> And that is fact

> because there is no other but ME.

>

>

>

> realization --

>

> There is no realization nor choice because they are both

thoughts,

> fiction.

>

> But if there was such a thing as realization and choice then it

would

> perhaps best apply to the serial killer on death row - who wants

to die

> to end his role.

>

>

>

> >

>

> --

----------

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-

Gene Polotas

Nisargadatta

Monday, October 17, 2005 3:50 PM

Re: the SELF personified as Anna

 

 

Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote:

>

> I have a problem, Gene, 'you' are another name for/of me....

>

> he he, so, are you going to concede?

>

> The Joy that I Am....==========================

 

We are all the same Consciousness that uses different aliases for the

JOY that it is.

This Alias mind and its body called " I " has to play its role in life

just as perfectly as Consciousness plays your Anna role perfectly.

 

If this Alias called I had any choice then I would have drowned in

Consciousness long ago to leave all this f'iction far behind.

LOVE

 

ana:

what you got serious all of a sudden? Play, Play, Joy, Joy

 

 

 

 

> -

> Gene Polotas

> Nisargadatta

> Monday, October 17, 2005 12:13 PM

> the SELF personified

>

>

> Compared to ME Jesus, Buddha and Ramana were ego maniacs.

> And that is fact

> because there is no other but ME.

>

>

>

> realization --

>

> There is no realization nor choice because they are both

thoughts,

> fiction.

>

> But if there was such a thing as realization and choice then it

would

> perhaps best apply to the serial killer on death row - who wants

to die

> to end his role.

>

>

>

> >

>

> --

----------

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " Gene Polotas " <semmin@e...> wrote:

 

>This Alias mind and its body called " I " has to play its role in life

>just as perfectly as Consciousness plays your Anna role perfectly.

>

>If this Alias called I had any choice then I would have drowned in

>Consciousness long ago to leave all this f'iction far behind.

 

Who told you, dear friend,

that you have to play a role

 

That you are choiceless, even this

is it not still a belief

 

How can fiction be left anywhere

if it is just fiction

 

Are you not already drowned

head over heals

 

lolila

Stefan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in agreement that there is no meaningful choosing. Choosing is a human

faculty that results from dualistic perception and memory, both of which are

illusory. Aside from that, there is no human. We seemingly make choices and

all sorts of exciting events occur within the illusion, but the choices do not

cause the events to occur, but are merely one of them. The ineffectiveness of

choices can easily be demonstrated. We cannot choose to believe, we simply

believe what we believe, which results from manifested experience within the

context of our limited awareness. We cannot choose to be happy or enlightened.

 

What we're most interested in is choosing surrender, acceptance,

willingness, since these are attitudes that will allow for the expansion of

awareness.

Any attempt to choose these will again demonstrate the ineffectiveness of

choice. We find ourselves struggling to surrender, wishing we could accept and

wondering why willingness won't obey our own will.

 

This is all as it should be, since all of physicality is nothing more than a

dream expression of consciousness and so the dream object cannot choose for

the dreamer. Expansion of awareness within consciousness is the key, and this

is allowed to occur as awareness expands to allow for it. There is nothing

that can be done to cause this to occur.

 

However, the illusion is experienced by consciousness, and this created

experience offers the opportunity to reveal Truth by uncovering self created

truth and removing it from view, leaving what is real, which can then be

noticed.

The exploration of illusion and the expansion of limiting beliefs is,

therefore, all that can be 'done' from the ego perspective.

 

Phil

 

 

 

In a message dated 10/18/2005 3:57:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

s.petersilge writes:

 

>This Alias mind and its body called " I " has to play its role in life

>just as perfectly as Consciousness plays your Anna role perfectly.

>

>If this Alias called I had any choice then I would have drowned in

>Consciousness long ago to leave all this f'iction far behind.

 

Who told you, dear friend,

that you have to play a role

 

That you are choiceless, even this

is it not still a belief

 

How can fiction be left anywhere

if it is just fiction

 

Are you not already drowned

head over heals

 

lolila

Stefan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, nicely said.

Consciousness arises from awareness and is not fully aware of itself. This

bounded consciousness expresses itself as the illusion, which is necessarily

bounded. Because this expression is limited, it experiences lack. Lack brings

about desire. Desire leads to the creation of ego and the choices designed to

fulfill that desire.

 

The search for meaning, then, becomes merely the apparent result of an

apparent choice motivated by an apparent desire (All occurring within the

dream)

which arises out of a sense of lack which is sourced in consciousness by

virtue of it's own limitations of awareness of Self. The choice, itself, has no

real meaning.

 

Phil

 

BTW, I like to think that, while the interpretation may be " logical " , no

processing was involved in the awareness that led to the interpretation. (Sounds

like a disclaimer for a nature film. " No consciousnessses were harmed in the

processing of this interpretation. " Okay, it must be getting late. :)

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Phil:

 

All that you speak of and about is quite logical processing Imo.

 

What this logistic processing does not address is the choice for a " search

for

meaning " , the basis of all human experience.

This search is the groundwork for all religion, all art, all abstractions of

philosophy, science, etc. It is inherent in

the human condition--an evolution of consciousness.

 

Seen thru to its end, it is a search for unconditional love. Something given

freely in the Being-ness we already

always possess. The experience of enlightenment, framed in the linear

movement

of time, is to allow for the

cognizing process to be 'seen' through. (Awareness of consciousness in the

dreaming state--a lucid field of

esperience in, of and as This--the I Am or Turiya and beyond--I Am That I

Am.)

 

Love,

Ana

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Phil:

 

All that you speak of and about is quite logical processing Imo.

 

What this logistic processing does not address is the choice for a " search for

meaning " , the basis of all human experience.

This search is the groundwork for all religion, all art, all abstractions of

philosophy, science, etc. It is inherent in

the human condition--an evolution of consciousness.

 

Seen thru to its end, it is a search for unconditional love. Something given

freely in the Being-ness we already

always possess. The experience of enlightenment, framed in the linear movement

of time, is to allow for the

cognizing process to be 'seen' through. (Awareness of consciousness in the

dreaming state--a lucid field of

esperience in, of and as This--the I Am or Turiya and beyond--I Am That I Am.)

 

Love,

Ana

 

 

-

ADHHUB

Nisargadatta

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 4:22 AM

Re: Re: the SELF personified as Anna

 

 

 

I'm in agreement that there is no meaningful choosing. Choosing is a human

faculty that results from dualistic perception and memory, both of which are

illusory. Aside from that, there is no human. We seemingly make choices and

all sorts of exciting events occur within the illusion, but the choices do not

cause the events to occur, but are merely one of them. The ineffectiveness of

choices can easily be demonstrated. We cannot choose to believe, we simply

believe what we believe, which results from manifested experience within the

context of our limited awareness. We cannot choose to be happy or

enlightened.

 

What we're most interested in is choosing surrender, acceptance,

willingness, since these are attitudes that will allow for the expansion of

awareness.

Any attempt to choose these will again demonstrate the ineffectiveness of

choice. We find ourselves struggling to surrender, wishing we could accept

and

wondering why willingness won't obey our own will.

 

This is all as it should be, since all of physicality is nothing more than a

dream expression of consciousness and so the dream object cannot choose for

the dreamer. Expansion of awareness within consciousness is the key, and this

is allowed to occur as awareness expands to allow for it. There is nothing

that can be done to cause this to occur.

 

However, the illusion is experienced by consciousness, and this created

experience offers the opportunity to reveal Truth by uncovering self created

truth and removing it from view, leaving what is real, which can then be

noticed.

The exploration of illusion and the expansion of limiting beliefs is,

therefore, all that can be 'done' from the ego perspective.

 

Phil

 

 

 

In a message dated 10/18/2005 3:57:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

s.petersilge writes:

 

>This Alias mind and its body called " I " has to play its role in life

>just as perfectly as Consciousness plays your Anna role perfectly.

>

>If this Alias called I had any choice then I would have drowned in

>Consciousness long ago to leave all this f'iction far behind.

 

Who told you, dear friend,

that you have to play a role

 

That you are choiceless, even this

is it not still a belief

 

How can fiction be left anywhere

if it is just fiction

 

Are you not already drowned

head over heals

 

lolila

Stefan

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol,

 

I suppose is the result of all our speaking about....

 

apparently...

 

smiles,

Ana

 

 

-

ADHHUB

Nisargadatta

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 6:32 AM

Re: Re: the SELF personified as Anna

 

 

Yes, nicely said.

Consciousness arises from awareness and is not fully aware of itself. This

bounded consciousness expresses itself as the illusion, which is necessarily

bounded. Because this expression is limited, it experiences lack. Lack brings

about desire. Desire leads to the creation of ego and the choices designed to

fulfill that desire.

 

The search for meaning, then, becomes merely the apparent result of an

apparent choice motivated by an apparent desire (All occurring within the

dream)

which arises out of a sense of lack which is sourced in consciousness by

virtue of it's own limitations of awareness of Self. The choice, itself, has

no

real meaning.

 

Phil

 

BTW, I like to think that, while the interpretation may be " logical " , no

processing was involved in the awareness that led to the interpretation.

(Sounds

like a disclaimer for a nature film. " No consciousnessses were harmed in the

processing of this interpretation. " Okay, it must be getting late. :)

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Phil:

 

All that you speak of and about is quite logical processing Imo.

 

What this logistic processing does not address is the choice for a " search

for

meaning " , the basis of all human experience.

This search is the groundwork for all religion, all art, all abstractions of

philosophy, science, etc. It is inherent in

the human condition--an evolution of consciousness.

 

Seen thru to its end, it is a search for unconditional love. Something given

freely in the Being-ness we already

always possess. The experience of enlightenment, framed in the linear

movement

of time, is to allow for the

cognizing process to be 'seen' through. (Awareness of consciousness in the

dreaming state--a lucid field of

esperience in, of and as This--the I Am or Turiya and beyond--I Am That I

Am.)

 

Love,

Ana

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...