Guest guest Posted October 23, 2005 Report Share Posted October 23, 2005 You have some valid points. What most humans call love is really a contractual need fulfillment with expectations and attachments. Acceptance is a more refined level of human love but is still not real love. Phil In a message dated 10/23/2005 3:47:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, wwoehr writes: Why this constant quacking about love ? One cannot provoke love. If love would be teachable the world already would be full of lovers. Love is again one of those kindergarten ideals espcially wide spread babbled about in America and India. The topic is not love but rather why is there no love. But that is much more arduous, needs all one's brains to inquire and also needs courage because one could find a truth which is no fun at all. Every romantic idiot can preach love and that are mostly those missing a brain. Love is only when the me is not. And therefore the topic and inquiry has to be the ending of the me and not this constant childish love babbling. Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2005 Report Share Posted October 23, 2005 Your Love has to be greater than your Fear For your Words to become Flesh. This is the Way you shall meet Flesh. Or is your Fear greater than your Love and you meet Fear*? *in the Flesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2005 Report Share Posted October 23, 2005 Why this constant quacking about love ? One cannot provoke love. If love would be teachable the world already would be full of lovers. Love is again one of those kindergarten ideals espcially wide spread babbled about in America and India. The topic is not love but rather why is there no love. But that is much more arduous, needs all one's brains to inquire and also needs courage because one could find a truth which is no fun at all. Every romantic idiot can preach love and that are mostly those missing a brain. Love is only when the me is not. And therefore the topic and inquiry has to be the ending of the me and not this constant childish love babbling. Werner Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > Your Love has to be greater than your Fear > > For your Words to become Flesh. > > This is the Way you shall meet Flesh. > > Or is your Fear greater than your Love and you meet Fear*? > > > > > *in the Flesh > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2005 Report Share Posted October 23, 2005 Dearest Werner, If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, you better 'duck' and/for it's all duck soup. Quacking and quaking and shaking the foresaking in the breaking of the heart in the Love of this to become this and know this and remember this is how it is, what it is since all there is is IS. What would you call it my Beloved Werner? Ana - Werner Woehr Nisargadatta Sunday, October 23, 2005 6:47 AM Re: words XVIII Why this constant quacking about love ? One cannot provoke love. If love would be teachable the world already would be full of lovers. Love is again one of those kindergarten ideals espcially wide spread babbled about in America and India. The topic is not love but rather why is there no love. But that is much more arduous, needs all one's brains to inquire and also needs courage because one could find a truth which is no fun at all. Every romantic idiot can preach love and that are mostly those missing a brain. Love is only when the me is not. And therefore the topic and inquiry has to be the ending of the me and not this constant childish love babbling. Werner Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > Your Love has to be greater than your Fear > > For your Words to become Flesh. > > This is the Way you shall meet Flesh. > > Or is your Fear greater than your Love and you meet Fear*? > > > > > *in the Flesh > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2005 Report Share Posted October 23, 2005 Romantic Anna, You already realized that I sympathize with you and your way of humour and so in respect to my sympathy you got a fool's liberty and free hand to utter any nonsense entering your mind. Werner Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > Dearest Werner, > > If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, you better 'duck' and/for it's all duck soup. > > Quacking and quaking and shaking the foresaking in the breaking of the heart in the > Love of this to become this and know this and remember this is how it is, what it is > since all there is is IS. > > What would you call it my Beloved Werner? > > Ana > - > Werner Woehr > Nisargadatta > Sunday, October 23, 2005 6:47 AM > Re: words XVIII > > > Why this constant quacking about love ? > > One cannot provoke love. If love would be teachable the world already > would be full of lovers. > > Love is again one of those kindergarten ideals espcially wide spread > babbled about in America and India. > > The topic is not love but rather why is there no love. But that is > much more arduous, needs all one's brains to inquire and also needs > courage because one could find a truth which is no fun at all. > > Every romantic idiot can preach love and that are mostly those > missing a brain. > > Love is only when the me is not. And therefore the topic and inquiry > has to be the ending of the me and not this constant childish love > babbling. > > Werner > > > Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > > > Your Love has to be greater than your Fear > > > > For your Words to become Flesh. > > > > This is the Way you shall meet Flesh. > > > > Or is your Fear greater than your Love and you meet Fear*? > > > > > > > > > > *in the Flesh > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2005 Report Share Posted October 23, 2005 How sweet, how kind, for you know it is One mind, and if you mind another mind who thinks s(he) is not the one mind, (who does not know who thinks so) well, dear Werner, wouldn't you say, that is what is called the disturbing (of) the peace? A thin red line between I and Thou, love and hate, war and peace, understanding and abiding in This-It is All There Is, let's dance, Werner. Let's Dance to the only Dance There Is. Ana - Werner Woehr Nisargadatta Sunday, October 23, 2005 7:03 AM Re: words XVIII Romantic Anna, You already realized that I sympathize with you and your way of humour and so in respect to my sympathy you got a fool's liberty and free hand to utter any nonsense entering your mind. Werner Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > Dearest Werner, > > If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, you better 'duck' and/for it's all duck soup. > > Quacking and quaking and shaking the foresaking in the breaking of the heart in the > Love of this to become this and know this and remember this is how it is, what it is > since all there is is IS. > > What would you call it my Beloved Werner? > > Ana > - > Werner Woehr > Nisargadatta > Sunday, October 23, 2005 6:47 AM > Re: words XVIII > > > Why this constant quacking about love ? > > One cannot provoke love. If love would be teachable the world already > would be full of lovers. > > Love is again one of those kindergarten ideals espcially wide spread > babbled about in America and India. > > The topic is not love but rather why is there no love. But that is > much more arduous, needs all one's brains to inquire and also needs > courage because one could find a truth which is no fun at all. > > Every romantic idiot can preach love and that are mostly those > missing a brain. > > Love is only when the me is not. And therefore the topic and inquiry > has to be the ending of the me and not this constant childish love > babbling. > > Werner > > > Nisargadatta , " Anna Ruiz " <nli10u@c...> wrote: > > > > Your Love has to be greater than your Fear > > > > For your Words to become Flesh. > > > > This is the Way you shall meet Flesh. > > > > Or is your Fear greater than your Love and you meet Fear*? > > > > > > > > > > *in the Flesh > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.