Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:08 AM, Nisargadatta wrote: >> >> R: your post will only have meaning to those who view themselves > to be >> people. to >> them you >> have said something.. to the rest, nothing. >> >> P: Exactly. I write for people to read, >> people who seek. Those who do not >> seek, do not need meaning. Do you have desires? > > > devi: ah, now i know why i avoid you as much as possible P; ) I guess, then, it was impossible for you to avoid this one. Then, ask yourself why, what message was there, specially, for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:08 AM, Nisargadatta wrote: > > >> > >> R: your post will only have meaning to those who view themselves > > to be > >> people. to > >> them you > >> have said something.. to the rest, nothing. > >> > >> P: Exactly. I write for people to read, > >> people who seek. Those who do not > >> seek, do not need meaning. Do you have desires? > > > > > > devi: ah, now i know why i avoid you as much as possible > > P; ) I guess, then, it was impossible for you to avoid this one. > Then, ask yourself why, what message was there, specially, > for you? > devi: this is funny pete.i have no questions to ask about it..sorry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.