Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 In Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:08 AM, Nisargadatta wrote: > > >> > >> R: your post will only have meaning to those who view themselves > > to be > >> people. to > >> them you > >> have said something.. to the rest, nothing. > >> > >> P: Exactly. I write for people to read, > >> people who seek. Those who do not > >> seek, do not need meaning. Do you have desires? > > > > > > devi: ah, now i know why i avoid you as much as possible > > P; ) I guess, then, it was impossible for you to avoid this one. > Then, ask yourself why, what message was there, specially, > for you? > devi: this is funny pete.i have no questions to ask about it..sorry P: And yet... you failed again to avoid me... must I conclude, I'm irresistible to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > In Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:08 AM, Nisargadatta wrote: > > > > >> > > >> R: your post will only have meaning to those who view themselves > > > to be > > >> people. to > > >> them you > > >> have said something.. to the rest, nothing. > > >> > > >> P: Exactly. I write for people to read, > > >> people who seek. Those who do not > > >> seek, do not need meaning. Do you have desires? > > > > > > > > > devi: ah, now i know why i avoid you as much as possible > > > > P; ) I guess, then, it was impossible for you to avoid this > one. > > Then, ask yourself why, what message was there, specially, > > for you? > > > devi: this is funny pete.i have no questions to ask about it..sorry > > P: And yet... you failed again to avoid me... must I > conclude, I'm irresistible to you? > > > > devi: actually, you haven't quite accepted that i am self-realized and your ego wants to teach me,,,so there is this little battle going on.... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > > In Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:08 AM, Nisargadatta > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > >> R: your post will only have meaning to those who view > themselves > > > > to be > > > >> people. to > > > >> them you > > > >> have said something.. to the rest, nothing. > > > >> > > > >> P: Exactly. I write for people to read, > > > >> people who seek. Those who do not > > > >> seek, do not need meaning. Do you have desires? > > > > > > > > > > > > devi: ah, now i know why i avoid you as much as possible > > > > > > P; ) I guess, then, it was impossible for you to avoid this > > one. > > > Then, ask yourself why, what message was there, specially, > > > for you? > > > > > devi: this is funny pete.i have no questions to ask about > it..sorry > > > > P: And yet... you failed again to avoid me... must I > > conclude, I'm irresistible to you? > > > > > > > > > devi: actually, you haven't quite accepted that i am self-realized > and your ego wants to teach me,,,so there is this little battle > going on.... > > > hey! This is love affair!!! my congratulation to you both LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > > Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > > > > In Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:08 AM, Nisargadatta > > wrote: > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> R: your post will only have meaning to those who view > > themselves > > > > > to be > > > > >> people. to > > > > >> them you > > > > >> have said something.. to the rest, nothing. > > > > >> > > > > >> P: Exactly. I write for people to read, > > > > >> people who seek. Those who do not > > > > >> seek, do not need meaning. Do you have desires? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > devi: ah, now i know why i avoid you as much as possible > > > > > > > > P; ) I guess, then, it was impossible for you to avoid this > > > one. > > > > Then, ask yourself why, what message was there, specially, > > > > for you? > > > > > > > devi: this is funny pete.i have no questions to ask about > > it..sorry > > > > > > P: And yet... you failed again to avoid me... must I > > > conclude, I'm irresistible to you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > devi: actually, you haven't quite accepted that i am self- realized > > and your ego wants to teach me,,,so there is this little battle > > going on.... > > > > > > hey! This is love affair!!! my congratulation to you both LOL > devi: my husband wouldn't appreciate your comment...and neither do i... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2005 Report Share Posted November 22, 2005 sorry Lady. i guess it is more then enogh if your beloved appreciate you and you your beloved. let my jokes alone! they will have a laughter by themselves ....still what i see in this : " devi: actually, you haven't quite accepted that i am self-realized and your ego wants to teach me,,,so there is this little battle going on.... " is a perfect description of a love affair!!! ....but shouldn't a self-realized being be in love with everyone?... .... a joke, devi...just a joke! love Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > > > > > > In Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie4@e...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2005, at 3:08 AM, Nisargadatta > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> R: your post will only have meaning to those who view > > > themselves > > > > > > to be > > > > > >> people. to > > > > > >> them you > > > > > >> have said something.. to the rest, nothing. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> P: Exactly. I write for people to read, > > > > > >> people who seek. Those who do not > > > > > >> seek, do not need meaning. Do you have desires? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > devi: ah, now i know why i avoid you as much as possible > > > > > > > > > > P; ) I guess, then, it was impossible for you to avoid > this > > > > one. > > > > > Then, ask yourself why, what message was there, specially, > > > > > for you? > > > > > > > > > devi: this is funny pete.i have no questions to ask about > > > it..sorry > > > > > > > > P: And yet... you failed again to avoid me... must I > > > > conclude, I'm irresistible to you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > devi: actually, you haven't quite accepted that i am self- > realized > > > and your ego wants to teach me,,,so there is this little battle > > > going on.... > > > > > > > > > hey! This is love affair!!! my congratulation to you both LOL > > > devi: my husband wouldn't appreciate your comment...and neither do > i... > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.