Guest guest Posted December 1, 2005 Report Share Posted December 1, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > thank you Phil > " It's not enlightenment because this is seeing the Truth wholly, > and since there are no parts to Truth, this is the only way that it > can 'truly' be seen. " . it seems I said it !!! > > > > > Hi Phil, > > > > > > Phil: > > Yes, you have some nice theories too. Since we're both discussing > > concepts > > > that aren't true, possibly we can do it in such a way that > conveys > > slightly > > less smugness? > > Don't we already have enough of that here? > > > > M: > > don't understand the word " smugness " ....but it sound not > > very " positive " ..........think you are right... > > > > your words sound, indead, very to " theorie " .....personnaly i'm not > > attached to any special theorie......i write about my perception > of > > things......how i " see " it for the moment....... > > i don't reproduce theories and philosophies that i read > > somewhere.....and i'm conscient that this, indead, would not make > > much sense..... > > > > I agree. The goal is an increase in awareness rather than the > collection of > > teachings or the mental circulation and reorganization of those > teachings. > > It's actually true that all things are already known within, and > so it's _______ PHIL, ALL CANNOT BE KNOWN. > > possible to look within for the answers to the mind's questions. > This is sometimes > > called intuitive 'knowing' and the answers must come within one's > current > > level of awareness and then simultaneously expands it. It's not > enlightenment > > because this is seeing the Truth wholly, and since there are no > parts to Truth, > > this is the only way that it can 'truly' be seen. However, it is a > genuine > > means by which the evolution of consciousness occurs in > preparation for > > awakening to the Truth. >Phil YOUR WORDS CHOKE YOU, FOR YOU WANT TO SAYING SEEING WITHIN IS THE EVOLTION TO AWAKENING, BUT YET YOU WANT TO CONCLUDE THAT YOU HAVE BECOME THAT. NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY , NAUGHTY YOU CANNOT BE GOD OR THE ABSOLUTE. i have given you many anologies that prove you different from GOD, one with but NOT GOD. And i have used logic and reason with analogies. All you have is words and your WORDS PROVE YOU WRONG. > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > hello the running horse, > > >yes....it seem that you slowly get little more conscient about reality.... >if you want to fight....yes, please........the fight is INSIDE this your proud ego.... ______________ OK ALL 3 OF YOUR GROW TOGETHER, AND LIVE TOGETHER CONFINED IN THE SAME ON POD.________ Llolololololol. here's how you see each other as ONE TRUTH, INSEPERABLE. Tell me how can you enjoy? how can you experience life or love. Marc, what you call proud ego- mind is exactly what you say you are. You are the MOST PROUD b/c you say you are 'One' with Truth. That you need no other. but you lie in you words because you have said let love flow through. This idea of being, one, is only an idea and is your 'GRAND ILLUSION,' truly called 'spiritual suicide' DEATH, marc. You and your friends are saying one thing yet acting and doing another by also saying interaction is that SAME ONE . This IDEA of all is one or all one is the same Truth, is the biggest escape for NOT living responsibly b/c you deny that your actions bare any consequences, THEREFORE you lie. When you eat, you experinece taste, when you watch TV your mind experiences, and a particular romantic movie may casue you to experience emotions. you said about meeting women or something. Now to say this is not experience, or that YOUR ONE is the SAME ONE as the OTHER ONE beside you, MAKES you are a liar and a just listening to you and your friends, i realize you are all 3 in one. Many more here are talking one, but you are all permitting all kinds of life to be this one experience and you have IMAGINED your own dream that all action is inaction -____________ and that justifies your choices of what you want to do and find your pleasures in. i'm paying close attention to your lists of Nihilists, and mayavadi philosophy. i'll put my 24/7 life up to any of yours. let's see if you one is not two and filled in duality. And it's all YOUR MIND that is locked up in the pea pod. And nothing more. Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? ANSWER THAT QUESTION _________PLEASE. ANY OF YOU? and don't tell me love, man just love.-- or i might send you all to the joint with a joint. LOLOLOL and you 3 peas could learn to make love to each other, as others do in the joint. That's some fun loving there ___________________________-YA RIGHT BOYS. lol Whitehorserides again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2005 Report Share Posted December 1, 2005 Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: hello the proud white horse again, yes....would be good if you start to take responsibility..... nobody else than you is responsible for this your words of extrem " seperations " .....into different categories.....into different kind of " love to/for/from God " ........ you have a realy strange idea of life....and aim of life.....and idea about " serving God " .........or " whoever " ....and " whatever " everybody is responsible for own life.....indead, there is no God existing who could be responsible for extrem ego-minds....... this responsibility is also a great gift.....an open door to freedom and peace....... but yes,....it seem that some people don't " understand " this responsibilty and run around like being lost.....in deep negativity......and hate...... and then...sure....you will feel again....and again this your " love " .......because it's the " life-breath " of all......... i have no problem with your religious ideas, concepts and ideas...... after all....it's still....and still Now.....your responsibilty to handle Your life....... so, please do it...... and so, because i'm responsible for my peace and freedom too.....i need to leave you again....with this your concepts and " poisen " in your mind..... Regards and peace Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2005 Report Share Posted December 1, 2005 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > <green1911@v...> wrote: > marc, your a rambling road show of emptiness. E______GO ______ Again you avoid questions, whose God, your God, his God all god. you are confused, too many gods and you admit each to his/her own god that's b/s and bin laden might eat you with his god. but what do you care, it's all god. see how foolish that sounds how may fathers did you have, ten? when we can agree to having the same Father then we can live like brothers/sisters but until then _____________sorry. just lost in many Gods. Read the HOlY PROPHETS. well i guess you won't understand because i sound just like them, > hello the proud white horse again, > > yes....would be good if you start to take responsibility..... > > nobody else than you is responsible for this your words of > extrem " seperations " .....into different categories.....into different > kind of " love to/for/from God " ........ > > you have a realy strange idea of life....and aim of life.....and idea > about " serving God " .........or " whoever " ....and " whatever " > > everybody is responsible for own life.....indead, there is no God > existing who could be responsible for extrem ego-minds....... > > this responsibility is also a great gift.....an open door to freedom > and peace....... > > but yes,....it seem that some people don't " understand " this > responsibilty and run around like being lost.....in deep > negativity......and hate...... > > and then...sure....you will feel again....and again this > your " love " .......because it's the " life-breath " of all......... > > i have no problem with your religious ideas, concepts and ideas...... > after all....it's still....and still Now.....your responsibilty to > handle Your life....... > > so, please do it...... > > and so, because i'm responsible for my peace and freedom too.....i > need to leave you again....with this your concepts and " poisen " in > your mind..... > > Regards and peace > > Marc > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > > <green1911@v...> wrote: > hello the best friend of God...again, and still...., the question " whose God " can't be described in any words... there can only be one God....means, one energy which relate all in a worldly perception (by the mind) if one accept this existence of energy and so, " God " ....the only way is to open the heart to this energy....and be in harmony with.... the only way to exist in harmony is to love all whitehorse....it realy seem that you have problems....for some reason.....to love all... if somebody tell you sincerly that he/she love you.....you don't " believe " .....because you live in false identification..... this false identification bring you all the time to the conclusion that, indead, by deepest of your mind/intellect....there is " nothing " to love in this your false identity this appear to be very clear....isn't it? do you have fear of the " God " of a terrorist or George B. or whoever?.........and therefore " invent " your own " God " ....to fight against....?....... so....who is mixed up with many " Gods " in mind.......you or me? i have no fear.......there is only one God...... the energy of God is the key to enter the door of peace, harmony and love..... i don't believe that you ever, until now, used this key for real.... wish a successful dissolvation of your illusions and dreams Regards and peace Marc > > marc, > your a rambling road show of emptiness. > > E______GO ______ > > Again you avoid questions, whose God, your God, his God all god. > > you are confused, too many gods > > > and you admit each to his/her own god > > > that's b/s and bin laden might eat you with his god. > > but what do you care, it's all god. > > see how foolish that sounds > > how may fathers did you have, ten? > > > when we can agree to having the same Father then we can live like > brothers/sisters but until then _____________sorry. > > just lost in many Gods. > > Read the HOlY PROPHETS. well i guess you won't understand because i > sound just like them, > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 Q: Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? A: Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > thank you Phil > > " It's not enlightenment because this is seeing the Truth wholly, > > and since there are no parts to Truth, this is the only way that > it > > can 'truly' be seen. " . it seems I said it !!! > > > > > > > > Hi Phil, > > > > > > > > > Phil: > > > Yes, you have some nice theories too. Since we're both > discussing > > > concepts > > > > that aren't true, possibly we can do it in such a way that > > conveys > > > slightly > > > less smugness? > > > Don't we already have enough of that here? > > > > > > M: > > > don't understand the word " smugness " ....but it sound not > > > very " positive " ..........think you are right... > > > > > > your words sound, indead, very to " theorie " .....personnaly i'm > not > > > attached to any special theorie......i write about my perception > > of > > > things......how i " see " it for the moment....... > > > i don't reproduce theories and philosophies that i read > > > somewhere.....and i'm conscient that this, indead, would not make > > > much sense..... > > > > > > > I agree. The goal is an increase in awareness rather than the > > collection of > > > teachings or the mental circulation and reorganization of those > > teachings. > > > It's actually true that all things are already known within, and > > so it's > > _______ PHIL, ALL CANNOT BE KNOWN. > > > possible to look within for the answers to the mind's questions. > > This is sometimes > > > called intuitive 'knowing' and the answers must come within > one's > > current > > > level of awareness and then simultaneously expands it. It's not > > enlightenment > > > because this is seeing the Truth wholly, and since there are no > > parts to Truth, > > > this is the only way that it can 'truly' be seen. However, it is > a > > genuine > > > means by which the evolution of consciousness occurs in > > preparation for > > > awakening to the Truth. > > >Phil > > > YOUR WORDS CHOKE YOU, FOR YOU WANT TO SAYING SEEING WITHIN IS THE > EVOLTION TO AWAKENING, BUT YET YOU WANT TO CONCLUDE THAT YOU HAVE > BECOME THAT. > > NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY , NAUGHTY YOU CANNOT BE GOD OR THE ABSOLUTE. i have > given you many anologies that prove you different from GOD, one with > but NOT GOD. And i have used logic and reason with analogies. All > you have is words and your WORDS PROVE YOU WRONG. > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hello the running horse, > > > > >yes....it seem that you slowly get little more conscient about > reality.... > > >if you want to fight....yes, please........the fight is INSIDE this > your proud ego.... > > > ______________ > > > > > OK ALL 3 OF YOUR GROW TOGETHER, AND LIVE TOGETHER CONFINED IN THE > SAME ON POD.________ > > Llolololololol. > > here's how you see each other as ONE TRUTH, INSEPERABLE. > > Tell me how can you enjoy? how can you experience life or love. > > Marc, what you call proud ego- mind is exactly what you say you are. > > You are the MOST PROUD b/c you say you are 'One' with Truth. That > you need no other. > but you lie in you words because you have said let love flow through. > This idea of being, one, is only an idea and is your 'GRAND > ILLUSION,' truly called 'spiritual suicide' DEATH, marc. > > You and your friends are saying one thing yet acting and doing > another by also saying interaction is that SAME ONE . This IDEA of > all is one or all one is the same Truth, is the biggest escape for > NOT living responsibly b/c you deny that your actions bare any > consequences, THEREFORE you lie. > > When you eat, you experinece taste, when you watch TV your mind > experiences, and a particular romantic movie may casue you to > experience emotions. you said about meeting women or something. > > Now to say this is not experience, or that YOUR ONE is the SAME ONE > as the OTHER ONE beside you, MAKES you are a liar and a just > listening to you and your friends, i realize you are all 3 in one. > > Many more here are talking one, but you are all permitting all kinds > of life to be this one experience and you have IMAGINED your own > dream that all action is inaction -____________ > > and that justifies your choices of what you want to do > and find your pleasures in. > i'm paying close attention to your lists of Nihilists, and mayavadi > philosophy. i'll put my 24/7 life up to any of yours. > > let's see if you one is not two and filled in duality. > And it's all YOUR MIND that is locked up in the pea pod. > > And nothing more. > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > ANSWER THAT QUESTION _________PLEASE. ANY OF YOU? > > > and don't tell me love, man just love.-- or i might send you all to > the joint with a joint. LOLOLOL and you 3 peas could learn to make > love to each other, as others do in the joint. That's some fun loving > there ___________________________-YA RIGHT BOYS. lol > > > > Whitehorserides again > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > .....yes....it's the wrong question..... the question should be......: " who is the best friend of God, you or me? " lolol > Q: > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > A: > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > thank you Phil > > > " It's not enlightenment because this is seeing the Truth > wholly, > > > and since there are no parts to Truth, this is the only way that > > it > > > can 'truly' be seen. " . it seems I said it !!! > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Phil, > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil: > > > > Yes, you have some nice theories too. Since we're both > > discussing > > > > concepts > > > > > that aren't true, possibly we can do it in such a way that > > > conveys > > > > slightly > > > > less smugness? > > > > Don't we already have enough of that here? > > > > > > > > M: > > > > don't understand the word " smugness " ....but it sound not > > > > very " positive " ..........think you are right... > > > > > > > > your words sound, indead, very to " theorie " .....personnaly i'm > > not > > > > attached to any special theorie......i write about my > perception > > > of > > > > things......how i " see " it for the moment....... > > > > i don't reproduce theories and philosophies that i read > > > > somewhere.....and i'm conscient that this, indead, would not > make > > > > much sense..... > > > > > > > > > > I agree. The goal is an increase in awareness rather than the > > > collection of > > > > teachings or the mental circulation and reorganization of those > > > teachings. > > > > It's actually true that all things are already known within, > and > > > so it's > > > > _______ PHIL, ALL CANNOT BE KNOWN. > > > > possible to look within for the answers to the mind's > questions. > > > This is sometimes > > > > called intuitive 'knowing' and the answers must come within > > one's > > > current > > > > level of awareness and then simultaneously expands it. It's > not > > > enlightenment > > > > because this is seeing the Truth wholly, and since there are > no > > > parts to Truth, > > > > this is the only way that it can 'truly' be seen. However, it > is > > a > > > genuine > > > > means by which the evolution of consciousness occurs in > > > preparation for > > > > awakening to the Truth. > > > > >Phil > > > > > > YOUR WORDS CHOKE YOU, FOR YOU WANT TO SAYING SEEING WITHIN IS THE > > EVOLTION TO AWAKENING, BUT YET YOU WANT TO CONCLUDE THAT YOU HAVE > > BECOME THAT. > > > > NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY , NAUGHTY YOU CANNOT BE GOD OR THE ABSOLUTE. i > have > > given you many anologies that prove you different from GOD, one > with > > but NOT GOD. And i have used logic and reason with analogies. All > > you have is words and your WORDS PROVE YOU WRONG. > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > hello the running horse, > > > > > > >yes....it seem that you slowly get little more conscient about > > reality.... > > > > >if you want to fight....yes, please........the fight is INSIDE this > > your proud ego.... > > > > > > ______________ > > > > > > > > > > OK ALL 3 OF YOUR GROW TOGETHER, AND LIVE TOGETHER CONFINED IN THE > > SAME ON POD.________ > > > > Llolololololol. > > > > here's how you see each other as ONE TRUTH, INSEPERABLE. > > > > Tell me how can you enjoy? how can you experience life or love. > > > > Marc, what you call proud ego- mind is exactly what you say you are. > > > > You are the MOST PROUD b/c you say you are 'One' with Truth. That > > you need no other. > > but you lie in you words because you have said let love flow > through. > > This idea of being, one, is only an idea and is your 'GRAND > > ILLUSION,' truly called 'spiritual suicide' DEATH, marc. > > > > You and your friends are saying one thing yet acting and doing > > another by also saying interaction is that SAME ONE . This IDEA of > > all is one or all one is the same Truth, is the biggest escape for > > NOT living responsibly b/c you deny that your actions bare any > > consequences, THEREFORE you lie. > > > > When you eat, you experinece taste, when you watch TV your mind > > experiences, and a particular romantic movie may casue you to > > experience emotions. you said about meeting women or something. > > > > Now to say this is not experience, or that YOUR ONE is the SAME > ONE > > as the OTHER ONE beside you, MAKES you are a liar and a just > > listening to you and your friends, i realize you are all 3 in one. > > > > Many more here are talking one, but you are all permitting all > kinds > > of life to be this one experience and you have IMAGINED your own > > dream that all action is inaction -____________ > > > > and that justifies your choices of what you want to do > > and find your pleasures in. > > i'm paying close attention to your lists of Nihilists, and mayavadi > > philosophy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'll put my 24/7 life up to any of yours. > > > > let's see if you one is not two and filled in duality. > > And it's all YOUR MIND that is locked up in the pea pod. > > > > And nothing more. > > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > ANSWER THAT QUESTION _________PLEASE. ANY OF YOU? > > > > > > and don't tell me love, man just love.-- or i might send you all to > > the joint with a joint. LOLOLOL and you 3 peas could learn to make > > love to each other, as others do in the joint. That's some fun > loving > > there ___________________________-YA RIGHT BOYS. lol > > > > > > > > Whitehorserides again > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 LOL oh! i have no doubt about it!!! love Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > > ....yes....it's the wrong question..... > > the question should be......: " who is the best friend of God, you or > me? " > > lolol > > > Q: > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > A: > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > thank you Phil > > > > " It's not enlightenment because this is seeing the Truth > > wholly, > > > > and since there are no parts to Truth, this is the only way > that > > > it > > > > can 'truly' be seen. " . it seems I said it !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Phil, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil: > > > > > Yes, you have some nice theories too. Since we're both > > > discussing > > > > > concepts > > > > > > that aren't true, possibly we can do it in such a way that > > > > conveys > > > > > slightly > > > > > less smugness? > > > > > Don't we already have enough of that here? > > > > > > > > > > M: > > > > > don't understand the word " smugness " ....but it sound not > > > > > very " positive " ..........think you are right... > > > > > > > > > > your words sound, indead, very to " theorie " .....personnaly > i'm > > > not > > > > > attached to any special theorie......i write about my > > perception > > > > of > > > > > things......how i " see " it for the moment....... > > > > > i don't reproduce theories and philosophies that i read > > > > > somewhere.....and i'm conscient that this, indead, would not > > make > > > > > much sense..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree. The goal is an increase in awareness rather than the > > > > collection of > > > > > teachings or the mental circulation and reorganization of > those > > > > teachings. > > > > > It's actually true that all things are already known within, > > and > > > > so it's > > > > > > _______ PHIL, ALL CANNOT BE KNOWN. > > > > > possible to look within for the answers to the mind's > > questions. > > > > This is sometimes > > > > > called intuitive 'knowing' and the answers must come within > > > one's > > > > current > > > > > level of awareness and then simultaneously expands it. It's > > not > > > > enlightenment > > > > > because this is seeing the Truth wholly, and since there are > > no > > > > parts to Truth, > > > > > this is the only way that it can 'truly' be seen. However, > it > > is > > > a > > > > genuine > > > > > means by which the evolution of consciousness occurs in > > > > preparation for > > > > > awakening to the Truth. > > > > > > >Phil > > > > > > > > > YOUR WORDS CHOKE YOU, FOR YOU WANT TO SAYING SEEING WITHIN IS THE > > > EVOLTION TO AWAKENING, BUT YET YOU WANT TO CONCLUDE THAT YOU HAVE > > > BECOME THAT. > > > > > > NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY , NAUGHTY YOU CANNOT BE GOD OR THE ABSOLUTE. i > > have > > > given you many anologies that prove you different from GOD, one > > with > > > but NOT GOD. And i have used logic and reason with analogies. > All > > > you have is words and your WORDS PROVE YOU WRONG. > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hello the running horse, > > > > > > > > >yes....it seem that you slowly get little more conscient about > > > reality.... > > > > > > >if you want to fight....yes, please........the fight is INSIDE > this > > > your proud ego.... > > > > > > > > > ______________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK ALL 3 OF YOUR GROW TOGETHER, AND LIVE TOGETHER CONFINED IN > THE > > > SAME ON POD.________ > > > > > > Llolololololol. > > > > > > here's how you see each other as ONE TRUTH, INSEPERABLE. > > > > > > Tell me how can you enjoy? how can you experience life or love. > > > > > > Marc, what you call proud ego- mind is exactly what you say you > are. > > > > > > You are the MOST PROUD b/c you say you are 'One' with Truth. > That > > > you need no other. > > > but you lie in you words because you have said let love flow > > through. > > > This idea of being, one, is only an idea and is your 'GRAND > > > ILLUSION,' truly called 'spiritual suicide' DEATH, marc. > > > > > > You and your friends are saying one thing yet acting and doing > > > another by also saying interaction is that SAME ONE . This IDEA > of > > > all is one or all one is the same Truth, is the biggest escape > for > > > NOT living responsibly b/c you deny that your actions bare any > > > consequences, THEREFORE you lie. > > > > > > When you eat, you experinece taste, when you watch TV your mind > > > experiences, and a particular romantic movie may casue you to > > > experience emotions. you said about meeting women or something. > > > > > > Now to say this is not experience, or that YOUR ONE is the SAME > > ONE > > > as the OTHER ONE beside you, MAKES you are a liar and a just > > > listening to you and your friends, i realize you are all 3 in one. > > > > > > Many more here are talking one, but you are all permitting all > > kinds > > > of life to be this one experience and you have IMAGINED your own > > > dream that all action is inaction -____________ > > > > > > and that justifies your choices of what you want to do > > > and find your pleasures in. > > > i'm paying close attention to your lists of Nihilists, and > mayavadi > > > philosophy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'll put my 24/7 life up to any of yours. > > > > > > let's see if you one is not two and filled in duality. > > > And it's all YOUR MIND that is locked up in the pea pod. > > > > > > And nothing more. > > > > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > ANSWER THAT QUESTION _________PLEASE. ANY OF YOU? > > > > > > > > > and don't tell me love, man just love.-- or i might send you all > to > > > the joint with a joint. LOLOLOL and you 3 peas could learn to > make > > > love to each other, as others do in the joint. That's some fun > > loving > > > there ___________________________-YA RIGHT BOYS. lol > > > > > > > > > > > > Whitehorserides again > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: So , do you want your joint for xmas, all three in the joint. LOLOL like i thought , you are blank and have no answers, b/c you are one in illusion and emptiness of how to give a proper explanation b/c you are mentally conditioned to a-void answer. lolol. murti, datta, swami, swimming in ocean with sharks. like you believe, the drop of water belongs to the ocean, you too will be there soon. If that's your desire. i will stay on shore and when time comes to cross i'll take the transendental ship and let Father navigate, all enjoy the amenties, the friends, and fun in the sun. And i'll play by the rules and not try and cross myself, like a fool . lol > > LOL > oh! i have no doubt about it!!! > love > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > ....yes....it's the wrong question..... > > > > the question should be......: " who is the best friend of God, you > or > > me? " > > > > lolol > > > > > Q: > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > A: > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > > > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > thank you Phil > > > > > " It's not enlightenment because this is seeing the Truth > > > wholly, > > > > > and since there are no parts to Truth, this is the only way > > that > > > > it > > > > > can 'truly' be seen. " . it seems I said it !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Phil, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil: > > > > > > Yes, you have some nice theories too. Since we're both > > > > discussing > > > > > > concepts > > > > > > > that aren't true, possibly we can do it in such a way > that > > > > > conveys > > > > > > slightly > > > > > > less smugness? > > > > > > Don't we already have enough of that here? > > > > > > > > > > > > M: > > > > > > don't understand the word " smugness " ....but it sound not > > > > > > very " positive " ..........think you are right... > > > > > > > > > > > > your words sound, indead, very to " theorie " .....personnaly > > i'm > > > > not > > > > > > attached to any special theorie......i write about my > > > perception > > > > > of > > > > > > things......how i " see " it for the moment....... > > > > > > i don't reproduce theories and philosophies that i read > > > > > > somewhere.....and i'm conscient that this, indead, would > not > > > make > > > > > > much sense..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree. The goal is an increase in awareness rather than > the > > > > > collection of > > > > > > teachings or the mental circulation and reorganization of > > those > > > > > teachings. > > > > > > It's actually true that all things are already known > within, > > > and > > > > > so it's > > > > > > > > _______ PHIL, ALL CANNOT BE KNOWN. > > > > > > possible to look within for the answers to the mind's > > > questions. > > > > > This is sometimes > > > > > > called intuitive 'knowing' and the answers must come > within > > > > one's > > > > > current > > > > > > level of awareness and then simultaneously expands it. > It's > > > not > > > > > enlightenment > > > > > > because this is seeing the Truth wholly, and since there > are > > > no > > > > > parts to Truth, > > > > > > this is the only way that it can 'truly' be seen. However, > > it > > > is > > > > a > > > > > genuine > > > > > > means by which the evolution of consciousness occurs in > > > > > preparation for > > > > > > awakening to the Truth. > > > > > > > > >Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > YOUR WORDS CHOKE YOU, FOR YOU WANT TO SAYING SEEING WITHIN IS > THE > > > > EVOLTION TO AWAKENING, BUT YET YOU WANT TO CONCLUDE THAT YOU > HAVE > > > > BECOME THAT. > > > > > > > > NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY , NAUGHTY YOU CANNOT BE GOD OR THE ABSOLUTE. i > > > have > > > > given you many anologies that prove you different from GOD, one > > > with > > > > but NOT GOD. And i have used logic and reason with analogies. > > All > > > > you have is words and your WORDS PROVE YOU WRONG. > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hello the running horse, > > > > > > > > > > >yes....it seem that you slowly get little more conscient about > > > > reality.... > > > > > > > > >if you want to fight....yes, please........the fight is INSIDE > > this > > > > your proud ego.... > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK ALL 3 OF YOUR GROW TOGETHER, AND LIVE TOGETHER CONFINED IN > > THE > > > > SAME ON POD.________ > > > > > > > > Llolololololol. > > > > > > > > here's how you see each other as ONE TRUTH, INSEPERABLE. > > > > > > > > Tell me how can you enjoy? how can you experience life or love. > > > > > > > > Marc, what you call proud ego- mind is exactly what you say you > > are. > > > > > > > > You are the MOST PROUD b/c you say you are 'One' with Truth. > > That > > > > you need no other. > > > > but you lie in you words because you have said let love flow > > > through. > > > > This idea of being, one, is only an idea and is your 'GRAND > > > > ILLUSION,' truly called 'spiritual suicide' DEATH, marc. > > > > > > > > You and your friends are saying one thing yet acting and doing > > > > another by also saying interaction is that SAME ONE . This IDEA > > of > > > > all is one or all one is the same Truth, is the biggest escape > > for > > > > NOT living responsibly b/c you deny that your actions bare any > > > > consequences, THEREFORE you lie. > > > > > > > > When you eat, you experinece taste, when you watch TV your mind > > > > experiences, and a particular romantic movie may casue you to > > > > experience emotions. you said about meeting women or something. > > > > > > > > Now to say this is not experience, or that YOUR ONE is the > SAME > > > ONE > > > > as the OTHER ONE beside you, MAKES you are a liar and a just > > > > listening to you and your friends, i realize you are all 3 in > one. > > > > > > > > Many more here are talking one, but you are all permitting all > > > kinds > > > > of life to be this one experience and you have IMAGINED your > own > > > > dream that all action is inaction -____________ > > > > > > > > and that justifies your choices of what you want to do > > > > and find your pleasures in. > > > > i'm paying close attention to your lists of Nihilists, and > > mayavadi > > > > philosophy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'll put my 24/7 life up to any of yours. > > > > > > > > let's see if you one is not two and filled in duality. > > > > And it's all YOUR MIND that is locked up in the pea pod. > > > > > > > > And nothing more. > > > > > > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > > > ANSWER THAT QUESTION _________PLEASE. ANY OF YOU? > > > > > > > > > > > > and don't tell me love, man just love.-- or i might send you > all > > to > > > > the joint with a joint. LOLOLOL and you 3 peas could learn to > > make > > > > love to each other, as others do in the joint. That's some fun > > > loving > > > > there ___________________________-YA RIGHT BOYS. lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whitehorserides again > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 2, 2005 Report Share Posted December 2, 2005 thank you my friend, i need no joint. lol! yes, you're right, i have no answer, and i find it good, because you have all. so, what the business in having them when i just have to ask? Q:so, onto what this trascendental ship is navigating? the answer is yours, remember! LOL Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > So , do you want your joint for xmas, all three in the joint. LOLOL > > like i thought , you are blank and have no answers, b/c you are one > in illusion and emptiness of how to give a proper explanation b/c you > are mentally conditioned to a-void answer. > > lolol. > > murti, datta, swami, swimming in ocean with sharks. > > like you believe, the drop of water belongs to the ocean, you too > will be there soon. If that's your desire. > > i will stay on shore and when time comes to cross i'll take the > transendental ship and let Father navigate, all enjoy the amenties, > the friends, and fun in the sun. And i'll play by the rules and not > try and cross myself, like a fool . lol > > > LOL > > oh! i have no doubt about it!!! > > love > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > ....yes....it's the wrong question..... > > > > > > the question should be......: " who is the best friend of God, you > > or > > > me? " > > > > > > lolol > > > > > > > Q: > > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > > > A: > > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > > > > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " > <bigwaaba> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > thank you Phil > > > > > > " It's not enlightenment because this is seeing the Truth > > > > wholly, > > > > > > and since there are no parts to Truth, this is the only > way > > > that > > > > > it > > > > > > can 'truly' be seen. " . it seems I said it !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Phil, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil: > > > > > > > Yes, you have some nice theories too. Since we're both > > > > > discussing > > > > > > > concepts > > > > > > > > that aren't true, possibly we can do it in such a way > > that > > > > > > conveys > > > > > > > slightly > > > > > > > less smugness? > > > > > > > Don't we already have enough of that here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > M: > > > > > > > don't understand the word " smugness " ....but it sound not > > > > > > > very " positive " ..........think you are right... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your words sound, indead, very > to " theorie " .....personnaly > > > i'm > > > > > not > > > > > > > attached to any special theorie......i write about my > > > > perception > > > > > > of > > > > > > > things......how i " see " it for the moment....... > > > > > > > i don't reproduce theories and philosophies that i read > > > > > > > somewhere.....and i'm conscient that this, indead, would > > not > > > > make > > > > > > > much sense..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree. The goal is an increase in awareness rather than > > the > > > > > > collection of > > > > > > > teachings or the mental circulation and reorganization of > > > those > > > > > > teachings. > > > > > > > It's actually true that all things are already known > > within, > > > > and > > > > > > so it's > > > > > > > > > > _______ PHIL, ALL CANNOT BE KNOWN. > > > > > > > possible to look within for the answers to the mind's > > > > questions. > > > > > > This is sometimes > > > > > > > called intuitive 'knowing' and the answers must come > > within > > > > > one's > > > > > > current > > > > > > > level of awareness and then simultaneously expands it. > > It's > > > > not > > > > > > enlightenment > > > > > > > because this is seeing the Truth wholly, and since there > > are > > > > no > > > > > > parts to Truth, > > > > > > > this is the only way that it can 'truly' be seen. > However, > > > it > > > > is > > > > > a > > > > > > genuine > > > > > > > means by which the evolution of consciousness occurs in > > > > > > preparation for > > > > > > > awakening to the Truth. > > > > > > > > > > >Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > YOUR WORDS CHOKE YOU, FOR YOU WANT TO SAYING SEEING WITHIN IS > > THE > > > > > EVOLTION TO AWAKENING, BUT YET YOU WANT TO CONCLUDE THAT YOU > > HAVE > > > > > BECOME THAT. > > > > > > > > > > NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY , NAUGHTY YOU CANNOT BE GOD OR THE ABSOLUTE. > i > > > > have > > > > > given you many anologies that prove you different from GOD, > one > > > > with > > > > > but NOT GOD. And i have used logic and reason with > analogies. > > > All > > > > > you have is words and your WORDS PROVE YOU WRONG. > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > > > <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hello the running horse, > > > > > > > > > > > > >yes....it seem that you slowly get little more conscient > about > > > > > reality.... > > > > > > > > > > >if you want to fight....yes, please........the fight is > INSIDE > > > this > > > > > your proud ego.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK ALL 3 OF YOUR GROW TOGETHER, AND LIVE TOGETHER CONFINED > IN > > > THE > > > > > SAME ON POD.________ > > > > > > > > > > Llolololololol. > > > > > > > > > > here's how you see each other as ONE TRUTH, INSEPERABLE. > > > > > > > > > > Tell me how can you enjoy? how can you experience life or > love. > > > > > > > > > > Marc, what you call proud ego- mind is exactly what you say > you > > > are. > > > > > > > > > > You are the MOST PROUD b/c you say you are 'One' with > Truth. > > > That > > > > > you need no other. > > > > > but you lie in you words because you have said let love flow > > > > through. > > > > > This idea of being, one, is only an idea and is your 'GRAND > > > > > ILLUSION,' truly called 'spiritual suicide' DEATH, marc. > > > > > > > > > > You and your friends are saying one thing yet acting and > doing > > > > > another by also saying interaction is that SAME ONE . This > IDEA > > > of > > > > > all is one or all one is the same Truth, is the biggest > escape > > > for > > > > > NOT living responsibly b/c you deny that your actions bare > any > > > > > consequences, THEREFORE you lie. > > > > > > > > > > When you eat, you experinece taste, when you watch TV your > mind > > > > > experiences, and a particular romantic movie may casue you to > > > > > experience emotions. you said about meeting women or > something. > > > > > > > > > > Now to say this is not experience, or that YOUR ONE is the > > SAME > > > > ONE > > > > > as the OTHER ONE beside you, MAKES you are a liar and a just > > > > > listening to you and your friends, i realize you are all 3 in > > one. > > > > > > > > > > Many more here are talking one, but you are all permitting > all > > > > kinds > > > > > of life to be this one experience and you have IMAGINED your > > own > > > > > dream that all action is inaction -____________ > > > > > > > > > > and that justifies your choices of what you want to do > > > > > and find your pleasures in. > > > > > i'm paying close attention to your lists of Nihilists, and > > > mayavadi > > > > > philosophy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'll put my 24/7 life up to any of yours. > > > > > > > > > > let's see if you one is not two and filled in duality. > > > > > And it's all YOUR MIND that is locked up in the pea pod. > > > > > > > > > > And nothing more. > > > > > > > > > > Which God is it that you speak of, when you say 'GOD'.? > > > > > > > > > > ANSWER THAT QUESTION _________PLEASE. ANY OF YOU? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and don't tell me love, man just love.-- or i might send you > > all > > > to > > > > > the joint with a joint. LOLOLOL and you 3 peas could learn to > > > make > > > > > love to each other, as others do in the joint. That's some > fun > > > > loving > > > > > there ___________________________-YA RIGHT BOYS. lol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whitehorserides again > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.