Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The living moment as a singularity

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

In physics black holes are referred to as

singularities. What this roughly means is

that all the laws of physics break down,

all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

are collapsed.

 

Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

moment, for in the living moment there is no

time, no is there distance (distance requires

time).

 

In the living moment all thoughts and forms

collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

dream of events and happenings continues after a

fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

events as they unfold from the vital life of the

burning Now.

 

There are those who will not understand this.

There are those who will understand it

perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

" event horizon " applies. Once the " event

horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

with crushing intensity. The dross of old

notions, dearly held, are burned away.

Eventually more and more the crust of self

is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

a silent burning blaze.

 

So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

or not.

 

The blaze of burning presence is utterly

indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

*ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

infinite window of nothingness whereby

everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

yearnings *are* again and again.

 

 

 

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thank you

a tongue of flame in darkness

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...> wrote:

>

> In physics black holes are referred to as

> singularities. What this roughly means is

> that all the laws of physics break down,

> all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> are collapsed.

>

> Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> moment, for in the living moment there is no

> time, no is there distance (distance requires

> time).

>

> In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> dream of events and happenings continues after a

> fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> burning Now.

>

> There are those who will not understand this.

> There are those who will understand it

> perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> Eventually more and more the crust of self

> is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> a silent burning blaze.

>

> So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> or not.

>

> The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> infinite window of nothingness whereby

> everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> yearnings *are* again and again.

>

>

>

>

> Bill

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...> wrote:

>

> In physics black holes are referred to as

> singularities. What this roughly means is

> that all the laws of physics break down,

> all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> are collapsed.

>

> Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> moment, for in the living moment there is no

> time, no is there distance (distance requires

> time).

>

> In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> dream of events and happenings continues after a

> fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> burning Now.

>

> There are those who will not understand this.

> There are those who will understand it

> perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> Eventually more and more the crust of self

> is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> a silent burning blaze.

>

> So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> or not.

>

> The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> infinite window of nothingness whereby

> everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> yearnings *are* again and again.

>

>

>

>

> Bill

>

DREAM ALLONG WITH ME , FLY ME TO THE MOON ~~~~~~~~~~~

 

having fun yet? are we now into science and forgetting philosophy,

the essence of love and perfections of life.

 

are we trading love for mechanics, bill?

 

is this the Quantum leap theory, bill?

 

 

black holes and the abyss , yes that too is well addressed.

 

i think another forum or discussin group might serve that well.

 

This is off topic moderater man, _______________boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote:

>

> thank you

> a tongue of flame in darkness

>

ya ______________ALICE COOPER______________

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

wrote:

> >

> > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > are collapsed.

> >

> > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > time).

> >

> > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > burning Now.

> >

> > There are those who will not understand this.

> > There are those who will understand it

> > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > a silent burning blaze.

> >

> > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > or not.

> >

> > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > yearnings *are* again and again.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Bill

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill wrote [[in physics black holes are referred to as singularities.

What this roughly means is that all the laws of physics break down,

all notions of time, space, dimension, etc. are collapsed.

 

Black holes can serve as analogy for the living moment, for in the

living moment there is no time, no is there distance (distance

requires time).]]

** I think you are in good company with this thought Bill. Every

read Dr. Fred A. Wolf?

http://www.fredalanwolf.com/

 

He too has equated black holes to .. the power of now.

 

Be Whole!..

Siddhananda Devi

 

Hermits_Cave-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from the depth of darkness...

 

 

LOLlolLOLlolLOLlol

 

who is there?!?

the belly of the universe.

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides "

<green1911@v...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba>

wrote:

> >

> > thank you

> > a tongue of flame in darkness

> >

> ya ______________ALICE COOPER______________

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > > are collapsed.

> > >

> > > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > > time).

> > >

> > > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > > burning Now.

> > >

> > > There are those who will not understand this.

> > > There are those who will understand it

> > > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > > a silent burning blaze.

> > >

> > > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > > or not.

> > >

> > > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > > yearnings *are* again and again.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Bill

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote:

>

>

> from the depth of darkness...

>

>

> LOLlolLOLlolLOLlol

>

> who is there?!?

> the belly of the universe.

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides "

> <green1911@v...> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > thank you

> > > a tongue of flame in darkness

> > >

> > ya ______________ALICE COOPER______________

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > > > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > > > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > > > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > > > are collapsed.

> > > >

> > > > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > > > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > > > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > > > time).

> > > >

> > > > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > > > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > > > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > > > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > > > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > > > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > > > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > > > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > > > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > > > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > > > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > > > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > > > burning Now.

> > > >

> > > > There are those who will not understand this.

> > > > There are those who will understand it

> > > > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > > > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > > > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > > > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > > > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > > > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > > > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > > > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > > > a silent burning blaze.

> > > >

> > > > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > > > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > > > or not.

> > > >

> > > > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > > > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > > > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > > > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > > > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > > > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > > > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > > > yearnings *are* again and again.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Bill

> > > >

> > >

 

yearning 's lingering lusts

when oh when, we'll we be free of lust.

 

this is material conscience,

stuck on the yearnings.

Purge the heart from all sin desire,

you are captured by brute beasts

posturing as kings.

and all they do

is engage you in flings.

Look over and above the trash

of this life,for who needs to live

like a begger in strife.

so whether you are in a tall house

or out in the cold. it doesn't mattter

if you heart is filled with lust.

for inside a house or out in the cold

your heart is still rust.

 

so get out the polish and clean it up

and i'll be over for veggies and sup.

 

do i hear an invitation????????????????????????????lol

 

(*_*)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so what?

 

 

Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides "

<green1911@v...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba>

wrote:

> >

> >

> > from the depth of darkness...

> >

> >

> > LOLlolLOLlolLOLlol

> >

> > who is there?!?

> > the belly of the universe.

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides "

> > <green1911@v...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > thank you

> > > > a tongue of flame in darkness

> > > >

> > > ya ______________ALICE COOPER______________

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel "

<plexus@a...>

> > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > > > > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > > > > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > > > > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > > > > are collapsed.

> > > > >

> > > > > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > > > > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > > > > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > > > > time).

> > > > >

> > > > > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > > > > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > > > > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > > > > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > > > > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > > > > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > > > > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > > > > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > > > > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > > > > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > > > > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > > > > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > > > > burning Now.

> > > > >

> > > > > There are those who will not understand this.

> > > > > There are those who will understand it

> > > > > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > > > > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > > > > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > > > > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > > > > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > > > > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > > > > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > > > > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > > > > a silent burning blaze.

> > > > >

> > > > > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > > > > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > > > > or not.

> > > > >

> > > > > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > > > > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > > > > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > > > > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > > > > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > > > > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > > > > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > > > > yearnings *are* again and again.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Bill

> > > > >

> > > >

>

> yearning 's lingering lusts

> when oh when, we'll we be free of lust.

>

> this is material conscience,

> stuck on the yearnings.

> Purge the heart from all sin desire,

> you are captured by brute beasts

> posturing as kings.

> and all they do

> is engage you in flings.

> Look over and above the trash

> of this life,for who needs to live

> like a begger in strife.

> so whether you are in a tall house

> or out in the cold. it doesn't mattter

> if you heart is filled with lust.

> for inside a house or out in the cold

> your heart is still rust.

>

> so get out the polish and clean it up

> and i'll be over for veggies and sup.

>

> do i hear an invitation????????????????????????????lol

>

> (*_*)

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Bill,

 

This is a very good post.

 

And, I have a request:

 

Could you please describe what you mean by

" event horizon " in this context [the context

of the moment].

 

With warm regards,

ac.

 

[NNB]

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote:

>

> thank you

> a tongue of flame in darkness

>

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...> wrote:

> >

> > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > are collapsed.

> >

> > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > time).

> >

> > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > burning Now.

> >

> > There are those who will not understand this.

> > There are those who will understand it

> > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > a silent burning blaze.

> >

> > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > or not.

> >

> > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > yearnings *are* again and again.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Bill

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q: Could you please describe what you mean by

" event horizon " in this context [the context

of the moment].

---------------

 

I take it you understand the concept of event

horizon in the context of physics. Keep in

mind that the notion of event horizon was used

metaphorically. In the context of physics

event horizon has a very precise explanation.

As a metaphor in the context of the " Singularity "

post there is not a correspondingly precise

explanation.

 

The key passage that your question applies to is:

 

" Once the 'event horizon' is crossed there is

a *falling in*. Having 'fallen in' the

immediacy of Now grows with crushing

intensity. The dross of old notions, dearly

held, are burned away. Eventually more and

more the crust of self is melted and

extinquished at the core, leaving a silent

burning blaze.

 

" So it is not about ideas and understanding.

It is about an event horizon, and its being

crossed or not. "

 

Note: A saying that expresses the same basic

idea is, " When the fruit is ripe, it falls from

the tree. " I will, however, attempt further

elaboration.

 

The key point is that it is not about an

intellectual understanding. At some point " being

in the now " starts gaining momentum, such that

the grip of thought, the movement of thought

begins to lose its hold. Technically, there is a

point of " critical mass " (again a parallel to

black holes) where being in the now further

begets being in the now. All of this is

independent of any sense of " who am I " , any sense

of self, any sense of personhood. There is

no- " body " , no- " one " , no sentient entity that is

undergoing the kind of transformation being

described. Rather, the transformation described

entails the disintegration of such patterns in

perception. As time compresses into the intense

immediacy of now there is no time for there to be

any " one " to experience. As stated before, there

may be apparent " events " , but they are fleeting

and transitiory. The crushing intensity of Now

obliterates all in its billiant immediacy.

 

The " event horizon " , then, refers to some point at

which being in the now begets being in the now

and takes on the quality of a " runaway reaction "

(again a physics notion) such that the Now

becomes an irresistable attractor and the power

of the old ego-based thought cycles and regimens

is overcome.

 

 

Bill

 

Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming "

<adithya_comming> wrote:

>

> Dear Bill,

>

> This is a very good post.

>

> And, I have a request:

>

> Could you please describe what you mean by

> " event horizon " in this context [the context

> of the moment].

>

> With warm regards,

> ac.

>

> [NNB]

>

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba>

wrote:

> >

> > thank you

> > a tongue of flame in darkness

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

wrote:

> > >

> > > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > > are collapsed.

> > >

> > > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > > time).

> > >

> > > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > > burning Now.

> > >

> > > There are those who will not understand this.

> > > There are those who will understand it

> > > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > > a silent burning blaze.

> > >

> > > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > > or not.

> > >

> > > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > > yearnings *are* again and again.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Bill

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...> wrote:

>

>

> Q: Could you please describe what you mean by

> " event horizon " in this context [the context

> of the moment].

> ---------------

>

> I take it you understand the concept of event

> horizon in the context of physics. Keep in

> mind that the notion of event horizon was used

> metaphorically.

 

Bill

i was curious as to what you imply by 'keep in mind that the notion'.

are these two seperate or is the action one, or two and what

distinguishes mind and notion?

Is there an ocean in that notion or an ocean in the notion? lol

 

 

In the context of physics

> event horizon has a very precise explanation.

> As a metaphor in the context of the " Singularity "

> post there is not a correspondingly precise

> explanation.

>

> The key passage that your question applies to is:

>

> " Once the 'event horizon' is crossed there is

> a *falling in*. Having 'fallen in' the

> immediacy of Now grows with crushing

> intensity. The dross of old notions, dearly

> held, are burned away. Eventually more and

> more the crust of self is melted and

> extinquished at the core, leaving a silent

> burning blaze.

 

__________so, since the notions are burned away does that still leave

mind?

>

> " So it is not about ideas and understanding.

> It is about an event horizon, and its being

> crossed or not. "

 

_____________ok so further splain your self here.

>

> Note: A saying that expresses the same basic

> idea is, " When the fruit is ripe, it falls from

> the tree. " I will, however, attempt further

> elaboration.

>

> The key point is that it is not about an

> intellectual understanding. At some point " being

> in the now " starts gaining momentum, such that

> the grip of thought, the movement of thought

> begins to lose its hold.

 

____________is this some experimental dream idea scientifically

proven or is this how you want to see it?

 

Technically, there is a

> point of " critical mass " (again a parallel to

> black holes) where being in the now further

> begets being in the now. All of this is

> independent of any sense of " who am I " , any sense

> of self, any sense of personhood. There is

> no- " body " , no- " one " , no sentient entity that is

> undergoing the kind of transformation being

> described. Rather, the transformation described

> entails the disintegration of such patterns in

> perception. As time compresses into the intense

> immediacy of now there is no time for there to be

> any " one " to experience. As stated before, there

> may be apparent " events " , but they are fleeting

> and transitiory. The crushing intensity of Now

> obliterates all in its billiant immediacy.

 

__________and darkness prevails?

 

 

>

> The " event horizon " , then, refers to some point at

> which being in the now begets being in the now

> and takes on the quality of a " runaway reaction "

> (again a physics notion) such that the Now

> becomes an irresistable attractor and the power

> of the old ego-based thought cycles and regimens

> is overcome.

 

______so does the 'event horizon' become the equalizer or the

stablizer in the ego-based thought or mind or is that notions?

Does such a plangent of irresistance become the erotic mind or exotic

mind or is there another euphoric cosmetic expression to the

application that can excite the false egoic to increase it's own

spheric role in the plasmodium of the plenary?

 

Do we ever come down bill, from the spheral rotation of the unknown

black holes?

 

Did you conjecture this with notion or mind or egoic manifestations

through realized colour formations, by smearing paint on the canvas

in a moment of absrtact thought?

 

i find your your prowess of the unknown most exhilirating and i'm

honoured to have this moment in ______________________.

 

signed,

 

 

forgotten in time_______ oh let me down gently

 

 

lol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>

> Bill

>

> Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming "

> <adithya_comming> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bill,

> >

> > This is a very good post.

> >

> > And, I have a request:

> >

> > Could you please describe what you mean by

> > " event horizon " in this context [the context

> > of the moment].

> >

> > With warm regards,

> > ac.

> >

> > [NNB]

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > thank you

> > > a tongue of flame in darkness

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > > > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > > > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > > > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > > > are collapsed.

> > > >

> > > > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > > > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > > > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > > > time).

> > > >

> > > > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > > > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > > > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > > > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > > > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > > > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > > > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > > > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > > > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > > > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > > > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > > > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > > > burning Now.

> > > >

> > > > There are those who will not understand this.

> > > > There are those who will understand it

> > > > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > > > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > > > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > > > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > > > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > > > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > > > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > > > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > > > a silent burning blaze.

> > > >

> > > > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > > > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > > > or not.

> > > >

> > > > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > > > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > > > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > > > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > > > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > > > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > > > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > > > yearnings *are* again and again.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Bill

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides "

<green1911@v...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

wrote:

> >

> >

> > Q: Could you please describe what you mean by

> > " event horizon " in this context [the context

> > of the moment].

> > ---------------

> >

> > I take it you understand the concept of event

> > horizon in the context of physics. Keep in

> > mind that the notion of event horizon was used

> > metaphorically.

>

> Bill

> i was curious as to what you imply by 'keep in mind that the

notion'.

> are these two seperate or is the action one, or two and what

> distinguishes mind and notion?

> Is there an ocean in that notion or an ocean in the notion? lol

>

>

> In the context of physics

> > event horizon has a very precise explanation.

> > As a metaphor in the context of the " Singularity "

> > post there is not a correspondingly precise

> > explanation.

> >

> > The key passage that your question applies to is:

> >

> > " Once the 'event horizon' is crossed there is

> > a *falling in*. Having 'fallen in' the

> > immediacy of Now grows with crushing

> > intensity. The dross of old notions, dearly

> > held, are burned away. Eventually more and

> > more the crust of self is melted and

> > extinquished at the core, leaving a silent

> > burning blaze.

>

> __________so, since the notions are burned away does that still

leave

> mind?

> >

> > " So it is not about ideas and understanding.

> > It is about an event horizon, and its being

> > crossed or not. "

>

> _____________ok so further splain your self here.

> >

> > Note: A saying that expresses the same basic

> > idea is, " When the fruit is ripe, it falls from

> > the tree. " I will, however, attempt further

> > elaboration.

> >

> > The key point is that it is not about an

> > intellectual understanding. At some point " being

> > in the now " starts gaining momentum, such that

> > the grip of thought, the movement of thought

> > begins to lose its hold.

>

> ____________is this some experimental dream idea scientifically

> proven or is this how you want to see it?

>

> Technically, there is a

> > point of " critical mass " (again a parallel to

> > black holes) where being in the now further

> > begets being in the now. All of this is

> > independent of any sense of " who am I " , any sense

> > of self, any sense of personhood. There is

> > no- " body " , no- " one " , no sentient entity that is

> > undergoing the kind of transformation being

> > described. Rather, the transformation described

> > entails the disintegration of such patterns in

> > perception. As time compresses into the intense

> > immediacy of now there is no time for there to be

> > any " one " to experience. As stated before, there

> > may be apparent " events " , but they are fleeting

> > and transitiory. The crushing intensity of Now

> > obliterates all in its billiant immediacy.

>

> __________and darkness prevails?

>

>

> >

> > The " event horizon " , then, refers to some point at

> > which being in the now begets being in the now

> > and takes on the quality of a " runaway reaction "

> > (again a physics notion) such that the Now

> > becomes an irresistable attractor and the power

> > of the old ego-based thought cycles and regimens

> > is overcome.

>

> ______so does the 'event horizon' become the equalizer or the

> stablizer in the ego-based thought or mind or is that notions?

> Does such a plangent of irresistance become the erotic mind or

exotic

> mind or is there another euphoric cosmetic expression to the

> application that can excite the false egoic to increase it's own

> spheric role in the plasmodium of the plenary?

>

> Do we ever come down bill, from the spheral rotation of the unknown

> black holes?

>

> Did you conjecture this with notion or mind or egoic

manifestations

> through realized colour formations, by smearing paint on the canvas

> in a moment of absrtact thought?

>

> i find your your prowess of the unknown most exhilirating and i'm

> honoured to have this moment in ______________________.

>

> signed,

>

>

> forgotten in time_______ oh let me down gently

>

>

> lol

>

>

> > Bill

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming "

> > <adithya_comming> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bill,

> > >

> > > This is a very good post.

> > >

> > > And, I have a request:

> > >

> > > Could you please describe what you mean by

> > > " event horizon " in this context [the context

> > > of the moment].

> > >

> > > With warm regards,

> > > ac.

> > >

> > > [NNB]

> > >

> >

 

 

 

 

so bill

 

may be you missed my questions here's a replay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very Nice, Bill!

 

So once the Black Hole has

sucked the whole galaxy

[the world, the thoughts]...

 

when and how does the outward expansion

[the thoughts, the world] begins

Again?

 

Or, does it never happen at all?

 

....

 

Because, as far as remember...

the physical Black Holes explode

in galaxies Again and so it goes...

 

 

From Singularity... to multiplicity...

From Multiplicity... to Singularity...

 

and back... and again!

 

Seeing that Hawkins remarked:

 

Why does the universe goes through

all the troubles of 'becoming'? To]

what end?

 

 

Does the " thought world' too goes the same

way... back and forth?

 

With warm regards,

ac.

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...> wrote:

>

>

> Q: Could you please describe what you mean by

> " event horizon " in this context [the context

> of the moment].

> ---------------

>

> I take it you understand the concept of event

> horizon in the context of physics. Keep in

> mind that the notion of event horizon was used

> metaphorically. In the context of physics

> event horizon has a very precise explanation.

> As a metaphor in the context of the " Singularity "

> post there is not a correspondingly precise

> explanation.

>

> The key passage that your question applies to is:

>

> " Once the 'event horizon' is crossed there is

> a *falling in*. Having 'fallen in' the

> immediacy of Now grows with crushing

> intensity. The dross of old notions, dearly

> held, are burned away. Eventually more and

> more the crust of self is melted and

> extinquished at the core, leaving a silent

> burning blaze.

>

> " So it is not about ideas and understanding.

> It is about an event horizon, and its being

> crossed or not. "

>

> Note: A saying that expresses the same basic

> idea is, " When the fruit is ripe, it falls from

> the tree. " I will, however, attempt further

> elaboration.

>

> The key point is that it is not about an

> intellectual understanding. At some point " being

> in the now " starts gaining momentum, such that

> the grip of thought, the movement of thought

> begins to lose its hold. Technically, there is a

> point of " critical mass " (again a parallel to

> black holes) where being in the now further

> begets being in the now. All of this is

> independent of any sense of " who am I " , any sense

> of self, any sense of personhood. There is

> no- " body " , no- " one " , no sentient entity that is

> undergoing the kind of transformation being

> described. Rather, the transformation described

> entails the disintegration of such patterns in

> perception. As time compresses into the intense

> immediacy of now there is no time for there to be

> any " one " to experience. As stated before, there

> may be apparent " events " , but they are fleeting

> and transitiory. The crushing intensity of Now

> obliterates all in its billiant immediacy.

>

> The " event horizon " , then, refers to some point at

> which being in the now begets being in the now

> and takes on the quality of a " runaway reaction "

> (again a physics notion) such that the Now

> becomes an irresistable attractor and the power

> of the old ego-based thought cycles and regimens

> is overcome.

>

>

> Bill

>

> Nisargadatta , " adithya_comming "

> <adithya_comming> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bill,

> >

> > This is a very good post.

> >

> > And, I have a request:

> >

> > Could you please describe what you mean by

> > " event horizon " in this context [the context

> > of the moment].

> >

> > With warm regards,

> > ac.

> >

> > [NNB]

> >

> >

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > thank you

> > > a tongue of flame in darkness

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > In physics black holes are referred to as

> > > > singularities. What this roughly means is

> > > > that all the laws of physics break down,

> > > > all notions of time, space, dimension, etc.

> > > > are collapsed.

> > > >

> > > > Black holes can serve as analogy for the living

> > > > moment, for in the living moment there is no

> > > > time, no is there distance (distance requires

> > > > time).

> > > >

> > > > In the living moment all thoughts and forms

> > > > collapse. In the intense vibrance of the moment

> > > > consciousness becomes as a plasma, compressed as

> > > > to a point, but also seemingly everywhere. The

> > > > dream of events and happenings continues after a

> > > > fashion, but diaphanously, transparently, as

> > > > fleeting dreams, as shadows dancing on a wall.

> > > > At the core is a vibrance of such intensity that

> > > > whatever shadows there are instantly fade in

> > > > significance. As the tongues of flame in a fire,

> > > > such is the impermanent non-lastingness of

> > > > events as they unfold from the vital life of the

> > > > burning Now.

> > > >

> > > > There are those who will not understand this.

> > > > There are those who will understand it

> > > > perfectly. As with a black hole the notion of an

> > > > " event horizon " applies. Once the " event

> > > > horizon " is crossed there is a *falling in*.

> > > > Having " fallen in " the immediacy of Now grows

> > > > with crushing intensity. The dross of old

> > > > notions, dearly held, are burned away.

> > > > Eventually more and more the crust of self

> > > > is melted and extinquished at the core, leaving

> > > > a silent burning blaze.

> > > >

> > > > So it is not about ideas and understanding. It

> > > > is about an event horizon, and its being crossed

> > > > or not.

> > > >

> > > > The blaze of burning presence is utterly

> > > > indifferent. And yet, somehow also, there is an

> > > > *ache*, a yearning to reach back out across the

> > > > infinite window of nothingness whereby

> > > > everything collapsed to a singularity. Such

> > > > yearnings are fleeting, just as the tongues of

> > > > flame... but like the tongues of flame, the

> > > > yearnings *are* again and again.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Bill

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, ac, methinks you are pressing

the black hole metaphor of the

Singularity post into warp-mode, where

whether it stretches, breaks, or just

snaps back in one's face is unclear.

 

> Because, as far as remember...

> the physical Black Holes explode

> in galaxies Again and so it goes...

Hadn't heard of this. Googled a bit and

found references to exploding " mini-black

holes " , as well as:

 

" Philosopher Quentin Smith and

physicist Lee Smolin have independently

suggested a mechanism for the evolution

of universes by natural selection. They

propose a multi-universe scenario in

which each universe is the residue of

an exploding black hole that was

previously formed in another universe " .

 

That, however, is entirely speculative.

 

If, when you say:

> Because, as far as remember...

> the physical Black Holes explode

> in galaxies Again and so it goes...

you mean black holes exploding as galaxies

in *our* universe, I don't believe there

is any scientific support for that.

 

 

Hawkings proposed that black holes " leak "

energy, which has been substantiated by

experiments.

 

As for the metaphorical black hole of the

Singularity post, perhaps *it* leaks a bit

too. I was actually alluding to that at

the end of the original post.

 

But I see no scientific necessity in any

of this. It is merely the utilization of

a metaphor drawn from science for poetic

purposes.

 

Which is not to dampen your enthusiastic

off-spinnings of ideas along the lines you

mention. Indeed, the little research I did

investigating your remarks let to some very

interesting articles, such as:

http://www.arn.org/docs2/news/hawkingsenigma012302.htm

The above I found to be a fascinating

discussion of the strange landscape of

contemporay physics. A quote from the

article:

 

We clearly see the world the way we see a hologram, "

Dr. Bousso said. " We see three dimensions. When you

look at one of those [hologram] chips, it looks pretty

real, but in our case the illusion is perfect. "

Dr. Susskind added: " We don't read the hologram. We

are the hologram. "

 

I highly recommend the article to anyone

interested in the far-out thoughtscapes

of contemporary physics.

 

 

Bill

 

 

 

 

AdvaitaToZen , " adithya_comming "

<adithya_comming> wrote:

>

> Very Nice, Bill!

>

> So once the Black Hole has

> sucked the whole galaxy

> [the world, the thoughts]...

>

> when and how does the outward expansion

> [the thoughts, the world] begins

> Again?

>

> Or, does it never happen at all?

>

> ...

>

> Because, as far as remember...

> the physical Black Holes explode

> in galaxies Again and so it goes...

>

>

> From Singularity... to multiplicity...

> From Multiplicity... to Singularity...

>

> and back... and again!

>

> Seeing that Hawkins remarked:

>

> Why does the universe goes through

> all the troubles of 'becoming'? To]

> what end?

>

>

> Does the " thought world' too goes the same

> way... back and forth?

>

> With warm regards,

> ac.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Bill!

 

My message was partly based on:

 

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/white_hole_030917.html

 

....

 

If black holes and the Big Bang

befuddle you, try wrapping your brain

around this one: The entire universe

may have been created in an explosion

inside a black hole.

" It's a mathematically plausible model

which refines the standard model of the

Big Bang, " said Blake Temple, a

mathematician at the University of

California, Davis.

....

 

The Big Bang has been compared to

black holes before, because the

tremendous crush of matter that defines

a black hole is much like the

unfathomable density that preceded the

Big Bang. Both phenomena are termed

singularities.

 

In the proposed modification to the

standard model, the Big Bang is an

actual explosion, Temple explained

today in a statement, and it occurs

within a black hole in an existing

space. The shock wave of the explosion

is expanding into an infinite space.

 

....

 

I am aware that as with much of many

other thing in space, sub-atomic

physics and neurology this too not yet

proven however it appeals to me mainly

because of its simplicity and

consistency.

 

I kind of agree that a phenomenon like

Black Hole with greatly small (in size)

and infinitely focused energy has a

*real* potential of expanding into

infinite empty space and creating the

entire matter universe by combining and

separating in different ratios.

 

IMO [and in my observation] Universe

manifests some very simple, consistent

and elegant ideas and it replicates it

to a great extent:

 

energy -> matter -> energy -> matter

 

water-> vapor-> water

 

water-> ice -> water

 

 

Similarly:

 

if galaxy -> Black Hole

 

then, possibly [iMO likely]

 

Black Hole -> galaxy

 

 

Or,

 

E = MC^2

 

then, MC^2 = E

 

 

also Galaxy = Black Hole

 

Black Hole = Galaxy

 

 

....

 

 

Some that such phenomenon that I find

replicated ware:

 

According to the current understanding

the entire matter universe is just a

ratio and combination of positive,

negative and neutral energy. According

to the same understanding, 99.999% of

the atom (matter) is empty and rest is

energy which seems like particle/string

[...we are yet not sure).

 

We are yet

not able to see within the sub-atomic

particles but I speculated what if the

same pattern (the universe being almost

all empty and some matter/energy stars

here and there, ...then within stars

there is still 99.999% of empty space

and some energy particles as star is

just a mass of matter] follows even

within the energy particle, ...that is

even the energy particle being almost

all (99.999%) empty.

 

It will be pretty

consistent with what we see elsewhere

in universe and nature, as the one

simple, elegant principle [such as

electrons going around nucleus, moons

going around planets, planets going

around stars, galaxy going around back

hole] ...applied to great scale.

 

....

 

 

But, all that said... I am not an

expert on Black Holes. I was mostly

asking if thoughts get 'stopped' or

'sucked in' by some process do they

then emerge back again? If yes, how,

why and when?

 

Of course, an answer might be possible

only if you were talking of it in terms

of such *real* phenomenon that you are

aware of and not just as a teaching

metaphor.

 

With warm regards,

ac.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <plexus@a...>

wrote:

>

> Well, ac, methinks you are pressing

> the black hole metaphor of the

> Singularity post into warp-mode, where

> whether it stretches, breaks, or just

> snaps back in one's face is unclear.

>

> > Because, as far as remember...

> > the physical Black Holes explode

> > in galaxies Again and so it goes...

> Hadn't heard of this. Googled a bit and

> found references to exploding " mini-black

> holes " , as well as:

>

> " Philosopher Quentin Smith and

> physicist Lee Smolin have independently

> suggested a mechanism for the evolution

> of universes by natural selection. They

> propose a multi-universe scenario in

> which each universe is the residue of

> an exploding black hole that was

> previously formed in another universe " .

>

> That, however, is entirely speculative.

>

> If, when you say:

> > Because, as far as remember...

> > the physical Black Holes explode

> > in galaxies Again and so it goes...

> you mean black holes exploding as galaxies

> in *our* universe, I don't believe there

> is any scientific support for that.

>

>

> Hawkings proposed that black holes " leak "

> energy, which has been substantiated by

> experiments.

>

> As for the metaphorical black hole of the

> Singularity post, perhaps *it* leaks a bit

> too. I was actually alluding to that at

> the end of the original post.

>

> But I see no scientific necessity in any

> of this. It is merely the utilization of

> a metaphor drawn from science for poetic

> purposes.

>

> Which is not to dampen your enthusiastic

> off-spinnings of ideas along the lines you

> mention. Indeed, the little research I did

> investigating your remarks let to some very

> interesting articles, such as:

> http://www.arn.org/docs2/news/hawkingsenigma012302.htm

> The above I found to be a fascinating

> discussion of the strange landscape of

> contemporay physics. A quote from the

> article:

>

> We clearly see the world the way we see a hologram, "

> Dr. Bousso said. " We see three dimensions. When you

> look at one of those [hologram] chips, it looks pretty

> real, but in our case the illusion is perfect. "

> Dr. Susskind added: " We don't read the hologram. We

> are the hologram. "

>

> I highly recommend the article to anyone

> interested in the far-out thoughtscapes

> of contemporary physics.

>

>

> Bill

>

>

>

>

> AdvaitaToZen , " adithya_comming "

> <adithya_comming> wrote:

> >

> > Very Nice, Bill!

> >

> > So once the Black Hole has

> > sucked the whole galaxy

> > [the world, the thoughts]...

> >

> > when and how does the outward expansion

> > [the thoughts, the world] begins

> > Again?

> >

> > Or, does it never happen at all?

> >

> > ...

> >

> > Because, as far as remember...

> > the physical Black Holes explode

> > in galaxies Again and so it goes...

> >

> >

> > From Singularity... to multiplicity...

> > From Multiplicity... to Singularity...

> >

> > and back... and again!

> >

> > Seeing that Hawkins remarked:

> >

> > Why does the universe goes through

> > all the troubles of 'becoming'? To]

> > what end?

> >

> >

> > Does the " thought world' too goes the same

> > way... back and forth?

> >

> > With warm regards,

> > ac.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...