Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Maharaj: Quality of being is consciousness Q1: ....part of my body is consciousness? M: What do you mean by " my body " ? Q1. I know what body is... I ...want to know what consciousness is. M. ...When the body is gone, where's consciousness? How will you know that you are? Questioner is mumbling at this point M. What's the prerequisite of consciousness? Can there be sweetness without sugar? Can consciousness be there without the body? If body is required to sustain the consciousness, who supplies the....? Questioner is mumbling M. In the absence of consciousness and the body...what are you? Now you want to get some benefit for you, some advantage. What's the advantage, gain for you? If you are neither tbe body, nor the food, nor the consciousness, then what are you? Q. Void? M. Why label is as the void? Q...... M...Your questions are over? Interpreter or someone in the audience is offering his understanding to the questioner who is also taping this session. Interpter says: He (Maharaj) says, if you really heard him how can there be questions at all? M. Where's the void when consciousness is gone? Who's there to say " void " ? Interpreter is asking the questioner why he asked about the void and about some concepts. M. When the consciousness is gone, you cannot say I am. -- From an old tape of Majaraj.... Hur's unedited interpretations. I came into the possession of these tapes and I'll turn them over to a professional writer soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > Maharaj: Quality of being is consciousness > > Q1: ....part of my body is consciousness? > > M: What do you mean by " my body " ? > > Q1. I know what body is... I ...want to know what consciousness is. > > M. ...When the body is gone, where's consciousness? How will you > know that you are? > > Questioner is mumbling at this point > > M. What's the prerequisite of consciousness? Can there be sweetness > without sugar? Can consciousness be there without the body? If > body is required to sustain the consciousness, who supplies the....? > > Questioner is mumbling > > M. In the absence of consciousness and the body...what are you? Now > you want to get some benefit for you, some advantage. What's the > advantage, gain for you? > > If you are neither tbe body, nor the food, nor the consciousness, > then what are you? > > Q. Void? > > M. Why label is as the void? > > Q...... > > M...Your questions are over? > > Interpreter or someone in the audience is offering his understanding > to the questioner who is also taping this session. > Interpter says: He (Maharaj) says, if you really heard him how can > there be questions at all? > > M. Where's the void when consciousness is gone? Who's there to > say " void " ? > > Interpreter is asking the questioner why he asked about the void and > about some concepts. > > M. When the consciousness is gone, you cannot say I am. > > > > > -- From an old tape of Majaraj.... Hur's unedited interpretations. I > came into the possession of these tapes and I'll turn them over to a > professional writer soon. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > Maharaj: Quality of being is consciousness > > Q1: ....part of my body is consciousness? > > M: What do you mean by " my body " ? > > Q1. I know what body is... I ...want to know what consciousness is. > > M. ...When the body is gone, where's consciousness? How will you > know that you are? > > Questioner is mumbling at this point > > M. What's the prerequisite of consciousness? Can there be sweetness > without sugar? Can consciousness be there without the body? If > body is required to sustain the consciousness, who supplies the....? > > Questioner is mumbling > > M. In the absence of consciousness and the body...what are you? Now > you want to get some benefit for you, some advantage. What's the > advantage, gain for you? > > If you are neither tbe body, nor the food, nor the consciousness, > then what are you? > > Q. Void? > > M. Why label is as the void? > > Q...... > > M...Your questions are over? > > Interpreter or someone in the audience is offering his understanding > to the questioner who is also taping this session. > Interpter says: He (Maharaj) says, if you really heard him how can > there be questions at all? > > M. Where's the void when consciousness is gone? Who's there to > say " void " ? > > Interpreter is asking the questioner why he asked about the void and > about some concepts. > > M. When the consciousness is gone, you cannot say I am. > THANK YOU HUR ________THIS PROVES NIZ WAS NOT A NIHILIST. and note again the sugar sweetness response. so far so good, basic questions are being responded correctly i concur. > > > -- From an old tape of Majaraj.... Hur's unedited interpretations. I > came into the possession of these tapes and I'll turn them over to a > professional writer soon. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 i'm happy you are opening eyes and SEE, just reading something else then the Bible and...what a miracle of understanding!! Sri Nisargadatta was not a nhilist! WOW! go on reading and SEEING... who knows what can happen... maybe... Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > Maharaj: Quality of being is consciousness > > > > Q1: ....part of my body is consciousness? > > > > M: What do you mean by " my body " ? > > > > Q1. I know what body is... I ...want to know what consciousness is. > > > > M. ...When the body is gone, where's consciousness? How will you > > know that you are? > > > > Questioner is mumbling at this point > > > > M. What's the prerequisite of consciousness? Can there be sweetness > > without sugar? Can consciousness be there without the body? If > > body is required to sustain the consciousness, who supplies > the....? > > > > Questioner is mumbling > > > > M. In the absence of consciousness and the body...what are you? Now > > you want to get some benefit for you, some advantage. What's the > > advantage, gain for you? > > > > If you are neither tbe body, nor the food, nor the consciousness, > > then what are you? > > > > Q. Void? > > > > M. Why label is as the void? > > > > Q...... > > > > M...Your questions are over? > > > > Interpreter or someone in the audience is offering his > understanding > > to the questioner who is also taping this session. > > Interpter says: He (Maharaj) says, if you really heard him how can > > there be questions at all? > > > > M. Where's the void when consciousness is gone? Who's there to > > say " void " ? > > > > Interpreter is asking the questioner why he asked about the void > and > > about some concepts. > > > > M. When the consciousness is gone, you cannot say I am. > > > > > THANK YOU HUR ________THIS PROVES NIZ WAS NOT A NIHILIST. > > and note again the sugar sweetness response. > > so far so good, basic questions are being responded correctly > > i concur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- From an old tape of Majaraj.... Hur's unedited interpretations. > I > > came into the possession of these tapes and I'll turn them over to > a > > professional writer soon. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > i'm happy you are opening eyes and SEE, just reading something else > then the Bible and...what a miracle of understanding!! > Sri Nisargadatta was not a nhilist! WOW! > go on reading and SEEING... > who knows what can happen... > maybe... be quiet , too many words big waaba boo. and i don't like to see you put BIG letters, -__blood pressure could go up 3 points________danger for you BIG waaba ....... what yoooooooooooou are not hering is the group that does speak on this forum has overtones of nihilism. Do you want me to go back and show where, they imply it loosly and never deny it, but just roll with it. Big waaba i read 100 books of Vedic origin. i'm quite familiar with the booboobluegreenmonkeyfishdemonwoodandnotgods. Did you forget i was brahman, used to preach on college campus's. go figure waaba. > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > > > Maharaj: Quality of being is consciousness > > > > > > Q1: ....part of my body is consciousness? > > > > > > M: What do you mean by " my body " ? > > > > > > Q1. I know what body is... I ...want to know what consciousness > is. > > > > > > M. ...When the body is gone, where's consciousness? How will you > > > know that you are? > > > > > > Questioner is mumbling at this point > > > > > > M. What's the prerequisite of consciousness? Can there be > sweetness > > > without sugar? Can consciousness be there without the body? If > > > body is required to sustain the consciousness, who supplies > > the....? > > > > > > Questioner is mumbling > > > > > > M. In the absence of consciousness and the body...what are you? > Now > > > you want to get some benefit for you, some advantage. What's the > > > advantage, gain for you? > > > > > > If you are neither tbe body, nor the food, nor the consciousness, > > > then what are you? > > > > > > Q. Void? > > > > > > M. Why label is as the void? > > > > > > Q...... > > > > > > M...Your questions are over? > > > > > > Interpreter or someone in the audience is offering his > > understanding > > > to the questioner who is also taping this session. > > > Interpter says: He (Maharaj) says, if you really heard him how > can > > > there be questions at all? > > > > > > M. Where's the void when consciousness is gone? Who's there to > > > say " void " ? > > > > > > Interpreter is asking the questioner why he asked about the void > > and > > > about some concepts. > > > > > > M. When the consciousness is gone, you cannot say I am. > > > > > > > > > THANK YOU HUR ________THIS PROVES NIZ WAS NOT A NIHILIST. > > > > and note again the sugar sweetness response. > > > > so far so good, basic questions are being responded correctly > > > > i concur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- From an old tape of Majaraj.... Hur's unedited > interpretations. > > I > > > came into the possession of these tapes and I'll turn them over > to > > a > > > professional writer soon. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta by the way... THIS is not in big letters, are the other to be little i'm sory you had to read all that stuff to come to THIS point and have to read this BIGWAABA'S gospel of nothing. thank you my friend for your warming hug Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > i'm happy you are opening eyes and SEE, just reading something else > > then the Bible and...what a miracle of understanding!! > > Sri Nisargadatta was not a nhilist! WOW! > > go on reading and SEEING... > > who knows what can happen... > > maybe... > > > be quiet , too many words big waaba boo. > > and i don't like to see you put BIG letters, -__blood pressure > > could go up 3 points________danger for you BIG waaba ....... > > > what yoooooooooooou are not hering is the group that does speak on > this forum has overtones of nihilism. Do you want me to go back and > show where, they imply it loosly and never deny it, but just roll > with it. Big waaba i read 100 books of Vedic origin. i'm quite > familiar with the booboobluegreenmonkeyfishdemonwoodandnotgods. > Did you forget i was brahman, used to preach on college campus's. > go figure waaba. > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Maharaj: Quality of being is consciousness > > > > > > > > Q1: ....part of my body is consciousness? > > > > > > > > M: What do you mean by " my body " ? > > > > > > > > Q1. I know what body is... I ...want to know what consciousness > > is. > > > > > > > > M. ...When the body is gone, where's consciousness? How will > you > > > > know that you are? > > > > > > > > Questioner is mumbling at this point > > > > > > > > M. What's the prerequisite of consciousness? Can there be > > sweetness > > > > without sugar? Can consciousness be there without the body? > If > > > > body is required to sustain the consciousness, who supplies > > > the....? > > > > > > > > Questioner is mumbling > > > > > > > > M. In the absence of consciousness and the body...what are you? > > Now > > > > you want to get some benefit for you, some advantage. What's > the > > > > advantage, gain for you? > > > > > > > > If you are neither tbe body, nor the food, nor the > consciousness, > > > > then what are you? > > > > > > > > Q. Void? > > > > > > > > M. Why label is as the void? > > > > > > > > Q...... > > > > > > > > M...Your questions are over? > > > > > > > > Interpreter or someone in the audience is offering his > > > understanding > > > > to the questioner who is also taping this session. > > > > Interpter says: He (Maharaj) says, if you really heard him how > > can > > > > there be questions at all? > > > > > > > > M. Where's the void when consciousness is gone? Who's there to > > > > say " void " ? > > > > > > > > Interpreter is asking the questioner why he asked about the > void > > > and > > > > about some concepts. > > > > > > > > M. When the consciousness is gone, you cannot say I am. > > > > > > > > > > > > > THANK YOU HUR ________THIS PROVES NIZ WAS NOT A NIHILIST. > > > > > > and note again the sugar sweetness response. > > > > > > so far so good, basic questions are being responded correctly > > > > > > i concur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- From an old tape of Majaraj.... Hur's unedited > > interpretations. > > > I > > > > came into the possession of these tapes and I'll turn them over > > to > > > a > > > > professional writer soon. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse interprets maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 what WH seems to go on avoiding is the fact that his so rumorous " nihilism danger " is not the case here! it is a case in the mind trying to conceptualize, to prove the words of the Master, to tesi if the " teaching " is correct. Being not able to let go this ghost of nihilism seems to be so dangerous, but it is just mind inability to rationalize and controll enlightenment. what danger may come from nothingness? in love Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > > > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse interprets > maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > what WH seems to go on avoiding is the fact that his so > rumorous " nihilism danger " is not the case here! > it is a case in the mind trying to conceptualize, to prove the words of > the Master, to tesi if the " teaching " is correct. Being not able to let > go this ghost of nihilism seems to be so dangerous, but it is just mind > inability to rationalize and controll enlightenment. > what danger may come from nothingness? > in love > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > > > > > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse interprets > > maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha > > > Do you have ticklish feet, big waaba? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 no, lotus feet LOL Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > > > what WH seems to go on avoiding is the fact that his so > > rumorous " nihilism danger " is not the case here! > > it is a case in the mind trying to conceptualize, to prove the > words of > > the Master, to tesi if the " teaching " is correct. Being not able to > let > > go this ghost of nihilism seems to be so dangerous, but it is just > mind > > inability to rationalize and controll enlightenment. > > what danger may come from nothingness? > > in love > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > > > > > > > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse interprets > > > maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha > > > > > > > > Do you have ticklish feet, big waaba? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > no, lotus feet > > LOL > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > what WH seems to go on avoiding is the fact that his so > > > rumorous " nihilism danger " is not the case here! > > > it is a case in the mind trying to conceptualize, to prove the > > words of > > > the Master, to tesi if the " teaching " is correct. Being not able > to > > let > > > go this ghost of nihilism seems to be so dangerous, but it is > just > > mind > > > inability to rationalize and controll enlightenment. > > > what danger may come from nothingness? > > > in love > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse > interprets > > > > maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have ticklish feet, big waaba? rub feet soothe mind not lotus feet _____=___ not lotus mind tks for being humble, you have ticklish mind?_______see Webster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 well, to be more precise... lotus ticklish feet. Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > no, lotus feet > > LOL > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > what WH seems to go on avoiding is the fact that his so > > > rumorous " nihilism danger " is not the case here! > > > it is a case in the mind trying to conceptualize, to prove the > > words of > > > the Master, to tesi if the " teaching " is correct. Being not able > to > > let > > > go this ghost of nihilism seems to be so dangerous, but it is > just > > mind > > > inability to rationalize and controll enlightenment. > > > what danger may come from nothingness? > > > in love > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse > interprets > > > > maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have ticklish feet, big waaba? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 thank you for having initiated me in this precious secret tecnique of rubbing. your friend hug you Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " <green1911@v...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > no, lotus feet > > > > LOL > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > what WH seems to go on avoiding is the fact that his so > > > > rumorous " nihilism danger " is not the case here! > > > > it is a case in the mind trying to conceptualize, to prove the > > > words of > > > > the Master, to tesi if the " teaching " is correct. Being not > able > > to > > > let > > > > go this ghost of nihilism seems to be so dangerous, but it is > > just > > > mind > > > > inability to rationalize and controll enlightenment. > > > > what danger may come from nothingness? > > > > in love > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " > <bigwaaba> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse > > interprets > > > > > maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have ticklish feet, big waaba? > > > > rub feet soothe mind > > not lotus feet _____=___ not lotus mind > > tks for being humble, > > you have ticklish mind?_______see Webster. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> wrote: > > > > thank you for having initiated me in this precious secret tecnique of > rubbing. > your friend > hug you big waaba, showing NEW WAABA you leave notes like hug from waaba love waaba your frind waaba maybe whitehorse and anna ____rubbing off on waaba waaba have nice words __gooooooooood___nice waaba, rub waaba belly. (:- love your friend in Him whitehorserides again. > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > wrote: > > > > > > no, lotus feet > > > > > > LOL > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " whitehorserides " > > > <green1911@v...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " <bigwaaba> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what WH seems to go on avoiding is the fact that his so > > > > > rumorous " nihilism danger " is not the case here! > > > > > it is a case in the mind trying to conceptualize, to prove > the > > > > words of > > > > > the Master, to tesi if the " teaching " is correct. Being not > > able > > > to > > > > let > > > > > go this ghost of nihilism seems to be so dangerous, but it is > > > just > > > > mind > > > > > inability to rationalize and controll enlightenment. > > > > > what danger may come from nothingness? > > > > > in love > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hur@n...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " bigwaaba " > > <bigwaaba> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'm just waiting for your next opinion on Nisargadatta > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is the irony of life, isn't it...when whitehorse > > > interprets > > > > > > maharaj for the seasoned members? hahaha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have ticklish feet, big waaba? > > > > > > > > rub feet soothe mind > > > > not lotus feet _____=___ not lotus mind > > > > tks for being humble, > > > > you have ticklish mind?_______see Webster. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.