Re:Lilola-I AM LIFE ITSELF

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 12/20/2005 1:20:47 PM Pacific Standard Time,

s.petersilge writes:

 

> Dear Larry, you write:

>

> >No, not a mirror, nothing is reflected, but a consciousness that is

> all things and is experiencing all things. And it is not a belief, it

> is my experience. That is how I experience myself, what I am.

> >...There is just consciousness that sees without seeing, thinks

> without >thinking, is without being. Yet still exists as all.

> ---

> You understood the process of experiencing. Now, why do you call this

> process " consciousness " ? Why give it a mentally constructed form? Why

> not leave it as it is... experiencing whatever " things " are

> experienced? If you leave it just there: what are you missing?

> ---

> >It, or I, am not static, I am all, that contains all, that is all,

> >and is change itself, and the root from which change occurs. Not

> static, >but alive.

> ---

> What you observe is a process, not a subject or object, there are not

> even things like roots or screens. Therefor any construct like

> " consciousness " , which is a static objectification, is meaningless and

> unnecessary. You just have to find out why you still feel tempted to

> construct such terms, who it does and how it happens.

>

> Just my 2 cents... :-)

> lilola

> Stefan

>

12.20.05

 

Larry: There is a problem with words. I do it to communicate in ordinary

terms.

But consider the telescope. From one end you see large. From the other you

see small. It's like that. Life-The Universe-Infinity exists as me, and I

exist as It.

With any words there are limitations. From the other end there are no

limitations.

What is your objection? You must know all of this.

 

Two cents worth.

 

Lilola----Lovely

 

p.s. I agree with you, but try writing your own idea instead of commenting

on mine, and you will see the problem. It's easier to tear down than to build

up.

 

p.p.s. Did you visit my website?

www.epston.com