Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Phil-Web of Time

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

In a message dated 12/30/2005 1:55:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,

ADHHUB writes:

 

> PatriciaThen why o why do I get back

> into the web of time ??

>

> L.E: Time does not exist in the moment. You would know that is you fell

> into

> stillness.

>

> Phil: Okay, do you see that Patricia is asking why she gets BACK into time

> after stillness? That question implies that she is NOT experiencing time in

> the

> stillness. This further implies that she does indeed know this.

>

> L.E. Yeah, you're correct. So, what is your answer to her?

> Mine is: Time and timelessnes are connected. One creates the other. Both

> are part of the Whole. It is only necessary to accept the connection. Most

> people have no idea there is timelessness. To realize that is to fulfill

> completeness, and that's that. The situation reminds me of an oyster. You

can

> pry it open a little bit without killing it to see inside. Meditation is like

> prying open the oyser. When meditation is over, we snap back into time.

> The only difference is that in time, we are aware that timelessness exists,

and

> most do not.

>

> Larry Epston

> www.epston.com

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote:

>

> In a message dated 12/30/2005 1:55:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,

> ADHHUB@A... writes:

>

> > PatriciaThen why o why do I get back

> > into the web of time ??

> >

> > L.E: Time does not exist in the moment. You would know that is

you fell

> > into

> > stillness.

> >

> > Phil: Okay, do you see that Patricia is asking why she gets BACK

into time

> > after stillness? That question implies that she is NOT

experiencing time in

> > the

> > stillness. This further implies that she does indeed know this.

> >

> > L.E. Yeah, you're correct. So, what is your answer to her?

> > Mine is: Time and timelessnes are connected. One creates the

other. Both

> > are part of the Whole. It is only necessary to accept the

connection. Most

> > people have no idea there is timelessness. To realize that is to

fulfill

> > completeness, and that's that. The situation reminds me of an

oyster. You can

> > pry it open a little bit without killing it to see inside.

Meditation is like

> > prying open the oyser. When meditation is over, we snap back

into time.

> > The only difference is that in time, we are aware that

timelessness exists, and

> > most do not.

> >

> > Larry Epston

> > www.epston.com

 

If there is no time, then how could it be connected to anything?

(I'm sorry, Phil. I had to. I'll bite my tongue on the rest of it.)

 

" Silver "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 12/30/2005 2:52:03 AM Pacific Standard Time,

Nisargadatta writes:

 

epston

Re: Phil-Web of Time

 

In a message dated 12/30/2005 1:55:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,

ADHHUB writes:

 

> PatriciaThen why o why do I get back

> into the web of time ??

>

> L.E: Time does not exist in the moment. You would know that is you fell

> into

> stillness.

>

> Phil: Okay, do you see that Patricia is asking why she gets BACK into time

 

> after stillness? That question implies that she is NOT experiencing time

in

> the

> stillness. This further implies that she does indeed know this.

>

> L.E. Yeah, you're correct. So, what is your answer to her?

> Mine is: Time and timelessnes are connected. One creates the other. Both

 

> are part of the Whole. It is only necessary to accept the connection.

Most

> people have no idea there is timelessness. To realize that is to fulfill

> completeness, and that's that. The situation reminds me of an oyster.

You can

> pry it open a little bit without killing it to see inside. Meditation is

like

> prying open the oyser. When meditation is over, we snap back into time.

> The only difference is that in time, we are aware that timelessness

exists, and

> most do not.

>

> Larry Epston

 

 

 

 

I see linear time as a sort of magic trick superimposed on Reality, made

possible by thought/memory, which are themselves superimpositions. Without the

ability to freeze a frame of the eternal present moment, there would be no

perception of 'past'. To recall a frame, which exists only in memory storage,

and use thought to project that into a supposed future is all that yields the

perception of future. If thought is not used to recall or project, there can be

no perception of time. This is what occurs in meditation.

 

Our friend looses that stillness when the (usually unconscious) thought

occurs that the mind is no more than it's own thoughts about itself, and it

trembles in fear of it's own dissolution. I see this because this is what

occurs

in my mind.

 

Phil

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 12/30/2005 10:16:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,

Nisargadatta writes:

 

" s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-1069

Re: Phil-Web of Time

 

Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote:

>

> In a message dated 12/30/2005 1:55:41 AM Pacific Standard Time,

> ADHHUB@A... writes:

>

> > PatriciaThen why o why do I get back

> > into the web of time ??

> >

> > L.E: Time does not exist in the moment. You would know that is

you fell

> > into

> > stillness.

> >

> > Phil: Okay, do you see that Patricia is asking why she gets BACK

into time

> > after stillness? That question implies that she is NOT

experiencing time in

> > the

> > stillness. This further implies that she does indeed know this.

> >

> > L.E. Yeah, you're correct. So, what is your answer to her?

> > Mine is: Time and timelessnes are connected. One creates the

other. Both

> > are part of the Whole. It is only necessary to accept the

connection. Most

> > people have no idea there is timelessness. To realize that is to

fulfill

> > completeness, and that's that. The situation reminds me of an

oyster. You can

> > pry it open a little bit without killing it to see inside.

Meditation is like

> > prying open the oyser. When meditation is over, we snap back

into time.

> > The only difference is that in time, we are aware that

timelessness exists, and

> > most do not.

> >

> > Larry Epston

> > www.epston.com

 

If there is no time, then how could it be connected to anything?

(I'm sorry, Phil. I had to. I'll bite my tongue on the rest of it.)

 

" Silver "

 

 

 

 

Oh, no tongue biting required. There's no reason I should have all the

'fun'. Hehe.

 

It's usually a safe bet to say all things are connected cause there's just

One thing to begin with, but it's not meaningful, to me, to take an illusion

(time), create a duality out of it (timelessness) and then say they're

connected. It's a little like saying glorp and glorplessness are connected.

They're

connected only because I made em up and connected em.

 

Phil

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...