Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Because I wasn't sure if the word " hutability " exists and I wanted to use it I googled it, and it does. Here is an excerpt of a googled hit: " It is the strong, aggressive ego that gets hurt, and as long as this hurtability is there, there is no non-violence... " Interesting, isn't it ? Werner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Because I wasn't sure if the word " hutability " exists and I wanted to > use it I googled it, and it does. Here is an excerpt of a googled hit: > > " It is the strong, aggressive ego that gets hurt, and as long as this > hurtability is there, there is no non-violence... " > > Interesting, isn't it ? > > Werner That is an interesting remark, indeed. I wonder if it could mean, possibly, that it is in the very nature of ego to hurt and get hurt? If so, then the solution would logically be the dissolution of it. " Silver " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069@h...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> > wrote: > > > > Because I wasn't sure if the word " hutability " exists and I wanted > to > > use it I googled it, and it does. Here is an excerpt of a googled > hit: > > > > " It is the strong, aggressive ego that gets hurt, and as long as > this > > hurtability is there, there is no non-violence... " > > > > Interesting, isn't it ? > > > > Werner > > That is an interesting remark, indeed. I wonder if it could mean, > possibly, that it is in the very nature of ego to hurt and get hurt? > If so, then the solution would logically be the dissolution of it. > > " Silver " Hi Werner and Silver, thank you for your words maybe the " nature of an ego(mind) " is to live in seperations (ignorance) to (of) him/herSelf.....and so, by this fact.....in " seperation " to " others " ........ because in reality....there are no seperations existing.....an ego- mind need to move all the time from one " place to other " ....kind of " running away " all the time from the Self....... and because in reality....nobody and nothing realy " move " .....except in the limited mind-functions.......this ego-mind don't get any real inner peace and freedom.......and is attached in a dream-kind of existence.... intelligent ego-minds all the time " invent " endless excuses to don't advance into the truth of " free and liberated " being of Self ego-minds and violence are connected...... there is never any real reason to " fight " (for) anything.....because everything is all the times....in perfect harmony...... maybe difficult for an ego-mind to " see " this harmony.....because for some " personal " reason...this ego-mind stepped out of harmony......by endless concepts and theories and excuses and rituals and ceremonies and and and....which are only valid.....for some duration of time..... wish a peaceful and respectful fight..... ever if there are no others.....and if not......would be interesting to know " why " they appear as " seperated " ...... Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33> wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@h...> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> > > wrote: > > > > > > Because I wasn't sure if the word " hutability " exists and I > wanted > > to > > > use it I googled it, and it does. Here is an excerpt of a googled > > hit: > > > > > > " It is the strong, aggressive ego that gets hurt, and as long as > > this > > > hurtability is there, there is no non-violence... " > > > > > > Interesting, isn't it ? > > > > > > Werner > > > > That is an interesting remark, indeed. I wonder if it could mean, > > possibly, that it is in the very nature of ego to hurt and get > hurt? > > If so, then the solution would logically be the dissolution of it. > > > > " Silver " > > Hi Werner and Silver, > > thank you for your words > > maybe the " nature of an ego(mind) " is to live in seperations > (ignorance) to (of) him/herSelf.....and so, by this > fact.....in " seperation " to " others " ........ > > because in reality....there are no seperations existing.....an ego- > mind need to move all the time from one " place to other " ....kind > of " running away " all the time from the Self....... > > and because in reality....nobody and nothing realy " move " .....except > in the limited mind-functions.......this ego-mind don't get any real > inner peace and freedom.......and is attached in a dream-kind of > existence.... > > intelligent ego-minds all the time " invent " endless excuses to don't > advance into the truth of " free and liberated " being of Self > > ego-minds and violence are connected...... > there is never any real reason to " fight " (for) anything.....because > everything is all the times....in perfect harmony...... > > maybe difficult for an ego-mind to " see " this harmony.....because for > some " personal " reason...this ego-mind stepped out of harmony......by > endless concepts and theories and excuses and rituals and ceremonies > and and and....which are only valid.....for some duration of time..... > > wish a peaceful and respectful fight..... > > ever if there are no others.....and if not......would be interesting > to know " why " they appear as " seperated " ...... > > > Marc You have raised a very important point here, Marc. I think you said it best with the observation that " ego-minds and violence are connected. " As ego separates itself from Self, it produces violence in a sense. Like ripping and shredding. Good observation. " Silver " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 In a message dated 1/4/2006 1:55:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-1069 Re: Hurtability Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Because I wasn't sure if the word " hutability " exists and I wanted to > use it I googled it, and it does. Here is an excerpt of a googled hit: > > " It is the strong, aggressive ego that gets hurt, and as long as this > hurtability is there, there is no non-violence... " > > Interesting, isn't it ? > > Werner That is an interesting remark, indeed. I wonder if it could mean, possibly, that it is in the very nature of ego to hurt and get hurt? If so, then the solution would logically be the dissolution of it. " Silver " The irony may be that ego, in particular an aggressive on, cares very little for others and has no direct motivation to cause hurt. It's stance is entirely self protective and defense or offense is always designed to keep oneself ignorant of the truth. The other is just 'collateral damage'. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.