Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: GuruRatings , " Durga " <durgaji108> wrote: > > GuruRatings@> object in the creation to worship, and non- duality. > > If all of this creation is that Self, then how would > any piece of it be a part from That? It is difficult > to focus the mind on a formless aspect of God. A > God with form or specific qualities is easier, and > (at least certainly within the system of Advaita/Vedanta > which I'm familiar with) there is actually no > contradiction at all. > > Durga > Namaste, Actually advaitins only accept such forms as a tool and unreal. The ultimate truth being Ajativada. I made an original entry on to Wikipedia on the same....ONS..Tony. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta_Ajativada --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2006 Report Share Posted January 12, 2006 GuruRatings , " Tony OClery " <aoclery> wrote: GuruRatings , " Durga " <durgaji108> wrote: > > GuruRatings@> object in the creation to worship, and non- duality. > > If all of this creation is that Self, then how would > any piece of it be a part from That? It is difficult > to focus the mind on a formless aspect of God. A > God with form or specific qualities is easier, and > (at least certainly within the system of Advaita/Vedanta > which I'm familiar with) there is actually no > contradiction at all. > > Durga > Namaste, Actually advaitins only accept such forms as a tool and unreal. The ultimate truth being Ajativada. I made an original entry on to Wikipedia on the same....ONS..Tony. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta_Ajativada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.