Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Beliefs and Problems

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I have tried hard, but I cannot think of anything which is not a belief.

 

Since seemingly everything is belief (and no distinction between

" truth " and " belief " is possible), belief can as well be called truth.

It makes no difference.

 

Such things as " problems " are meaningless, since one belief trying to

detect and/or solve conflicts between other beliefs does make no sense.

 

Greetings

Stefan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " Stefan " <s.petersilge@o...> wrote:

>

> I have tried hard, but I cannot think of anything which is not a

belief.

>

> Since seemingly everything is belief (and no distinction between

> " truth " and " belief " is possible), belief can as well be called truth.

> It makes no difference.

>

> Such things as " problems " are meaningless, since one belief trying to

> detect and/or solve conflicts between other beliefs does make no

sense.

>

> Greetings

> Stefan

>

 

good one Stefan. thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " Stefan " <s.petersilge@o...> wrote:

>

>>

> Such things as " problems " are meaningless, since one belief trying to

> detect and/or solve conflicts between other beliefs does make no

sense.

>

> Greetings

> Stefan

>

 

Hi Stefan,

 

yes....you are right......

 

in reality there are no " problems " and " conflicts " ......

there is endless peace

 

except for great ego minds....who " belief " they know

something......what " others " don't know....

 

there are no others.....and therefore no one " who " could " know "

something

 

.....included oneself

 

in front of formless and changless existence Itself

 

and this " included oneself " .......is what cause endless conflicts to an

ego......

 

but this still doesn't cause any conflict to the reality of being

 

 

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> I have tried hard, but I cannot think of anything which is not a belief.

>>>

 

What about the word " the " . The word " the " is something,

and as far as I can tell it is not a belief.

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@g...> wrote:

 

>What about the word " the " . The word " the " is something,

>and as far as I can tell it is not a belief.

>

>Bill

 

Hi Bill, this is an interesting remark. But... alas... what can I say.

At least your remark gives me another opportunity to explain my belief

(about beliefs) in more detail.

 

" The " is. It does not matter if meaning is attached. Even if it is

perceived as a mere sound, it is still being thought. It is not

possible to think without belief. Try it.

 

Admittedly, perception without belief would be possible if there

existed perception prior to thought. But this presupposes the belief

in the concept of time.

 

However I twist it: all is belief. Or: belief is all. Where there is

no belief, is no " is " .

 

There are no solutions. But when the above is fully grasped, it may

dawn that there are also no problems.

 

Greetings

Stefan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Anna Ruiz nli10u

 

> I have tried hard, but I cannot think of anything which is not a belief.

>>>

 

L.E: It's not that hard, and remember there are other verbal discriptions of

experience such as:

" I think " " I assume " " perhaps " etc.

But you can say, " my finger is bleeding, " or " I have a headache " or I'm leaving

the room. "

These statements don't have to be described as beliefs. Every belief contains a

thought,

but every thought is not a belief. And then there's the whole range of visual,

non-verbal thinking, that is also free of belief statements.

 

Larry Epston

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> Anna Ruiz nli10u@c...

>

>>I have tried hard, but I cannot think of anything which is not a

>>belief.

 

>L.E: It's not that hard

 

Larry, I rhink you have never tried hard, so you do not know what I

am talking about. But for you I repost my explanation about it as I

have written it as a response to Bill.

 

Bill: What about the word " the " . The word " the " is something, and as

far as I can tell it is not a belief.

 

Stefan: Hi Bill, this is an interesting remark. But... alas... what

can I say. At least your remark gives me another opportunity to

explain my belief (about beliefs) in more detail.

 

" The " is. It does not matter if meaning is attached. Even if it is

perceived as a mere sound, it is still being thought. It is not

possible to think without belief. Try it.

 

Admittedly, perception without belief would be possible if there

existed perception prior to thought. But this presupposes the belief

in the concept of time.

 

However I twist it: all is belief. Or: belief is all. Where there is

no belief, is no " is " .

 

There are no solutions. But when the above is fully grasped, it may

dawn that there are also no problems.

 

Greetings

Stefan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" The " is. It does not matter if meaning is attached. Even if it is

perceived as a mere sound, it is still being thought. It is not

possible to think without belief. Try it.

 

 

L.E: What is the relationship between experience and belief?

And how about all the other perception words, like " I think "

" I know " " Maybe " or, " I perceive, cosider, examine " etc.

A belief is a certain kind of thought and not thinking itself.

 

Larry Epston

www.epston.com

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not

possible to think without belief. Try it.

 

 

L.E: I disagree. There are many variations to thinking and belief is just one

of them.

You see a world that cannot be free of beliefs, but I do. As I said before, a

belief is a kind of thinking, but thinking is not constrained by beliefs.

You seem so certain you are correct. Are you trying to project your belief on

others? What does that accomplish?

 

Larry Epston

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote:

>

> " The " is. It does not matter if meaning is attached. Even if it is

> perceived as a mere sound, it is still being thought. It is not

> possible to think without belief. Try it.

>

>

> L.E: What is the relationship between experience and belief?

> And how about all the other perception words, like " I think "

> " I know " " Maybe " or, " I perceive, cosider, examine " etc.

> A belief is a certain kind of thought and not thinking itself.

>

> Larry Epston

> www.epston.com

 

Very Very Good Larry!

 

regards,

ac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote:

 

>L.E: What is the relationship between experience and belief?

>And how about all the other perception words, like " I think "

> " I know " " Maybe " or, " I perceive, cosider, examine " etc.

>A belief is a certain kind of thought and not thinking itself.

 

There is no thought without the belief that one (you call it " i " ) thinks.

 

Stefan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " Stefan " <s.petersilge@o...> wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , epston@a... wrote:

>

> >L.E: What is the relationship between experience and belief?

> >And how about all the other perception words, like " I think "

> > " I know " " Maybe " or, " I perceive, cosider, examine " etc.

> >A belief is a certain kind of thought and not thinking itself.

>

> There is no thought without the belief that one (you call it " i " )

thinks.

>

> Stefan

>

 

yes, it seems so evident!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 1/31/2006 1:07:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,

s.petersilge writes:

 

> There is no thought without the belief that one (you call it " i " ) thinks.

>

> Stefan

 

L.E: As long as you look at it this way, the door to the Infinite will be

locked to you.

 

Larry E.

 

p.s. This is DeCarte's fallacy that because he thinks, he is. That is

backward, and dead wrong.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , epston wrote:

 

Stefan:

>There is no thought without the belief that one (you call it " i " )

>thinks.

 

>L.E: As long as you look at it this way, the door to the Infinite

>will be locked to you.

 

Did you only lose track of what was said or do you really believe that

the key to that door are beliefs?

 

>p.s. This is DeCarte's fallacy that because he thinks, he is. That

>is backward, and dead wrong.

 

Yes, dead wrong, I agree. But exactly the opposite have I said. For

Decarte the reality of the individual person was not in question. In

my view the separate person is a concept: nothing more, nothing less.

A conceptual construct hold in place by... thoughts which are hold in

place by... beliefs. When the unnecessary beliefs fall apart things

are experienced... naturally...

 

BTW: Please believe me, I am not interested in amateurish

philosophical debates. I try to share my innermost. You have to find

things out by yourself. And I hope you are able to approach this

theoretical disagreement in the playful way it deserves, as the joke

that it is :-)

 

LoLiLa

Stefan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...