Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[NonDualPhil] the root location

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

On Jan 29, 2006, at 8:03 PM, billrishel wrote:

 

> Presence, awareness, the Now has no location.

> And further, there is no location *in* it.

>

> So there is no geometry of Now.

>

> Without location there is no time.

> So the Now is also timeless.

>

> The root location is the root of all extension

> and is the " here " , the " this " the " me, myself " .

> Where there is this, here, me myself there

> is the " origin " of a geometry that surveys

> a world of suffering.

>

>

>

> Bill

>

>

 

P: Very nice! It might be good to add that the

sense of 'I', 'me', and 'mine' is nothing but that

activity of the mind intent on managing

consciousness. Always seeking this sensation,

and avoiding than one. Always discriminating,

anticipating, acquiring, preventing, fearing,

always desiring to be entertained, and thrilled,

and always preferring that over this.

 

When it's seen that this activity is both the sense

of 'I " and the occluding factor, then the mind

becomes very quiet, and consciousness stands

alone unrestricted, undistinguishable from

'what is, in the now.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > Presence, awareness, the Now has no location.

> > And further, there is no location *in* it.

> >

> > So there is no geometry of Now.

> >

> > Without location there is no time.

> > So the Now is also timeless.

> >

> > The root location is the root of all extension

> > and is the " here " , the " this " the " me, myself " .

> > Where there is this, here, me myself there

> > is the " origin " of a geometry that surveys

> > a world of suffering.

> >

> >

> >

> > Bill

> >

> >

>

> P: Very nice! It might be good to add that the

> sense of 'I', 'me', and 'mine' is nothing but that

> activity of the mind intent on managing

> consciousness. Always seeking this sensation,

> and avoiding than one. Always discriminating,

> anticipating, acquiring, preventing, fearing,

> always desiring to be entertained, and thrilled,

> and always preferring that over this.

>

> When it's seen that this activity is both the sense

> of 'I " and the occluding factor, then the mind

> becomes very quiet, and consciousness stands

> alone unrestricted, undistinguishable from

> 'what is, in the now.'

.........

 

What you suggest gives a different spin to things

than what was intriguing me when I wrote the piece.

 

Your suggestion seems to posit a " mind " as fundamental,

as *behind* what appears.

 

My preference is to consider that " mind " is only

appearance.

 

Further, I find it interesting to consider that

the *appearance* of " mind " is " seeded " by the

so-called sense " here " , " this " , " me " , " myself " etc.

I am considering those four things as distinct

" flavors " of basically the same thing, i.e. a

sense of " central tendency " .

 

I am suggesting that without a sense of central

tendency there is not the possiblity of a sense

of extension (i.e. extensibility in space or

" length " ), and without extensibility you don't

have any geometry or sense of a space that can

" contain " anything. I'm just now thinking aspects

of this through, but it seems that without extension

you don't can't have a notion of quantity ( " how

much " ) either.

 

And without a notion of quantity, how can you

have a notion of time? It would have to be *very*

limited if you did have.

 

So, my core point is that a sense of central

tendency is essential to the notions of space

and time. And without space and time what kind of

" mind " can there *appear* to be?

 

Hence I am suggesting that a sense of central

tendency is more fundamental that any " appearance

of mind " .

 

And I am also suggesting that a sense of central

tendency is the fundamental stumbling block.

As I said initially, it is the " origin " of a

geometry that surveys a world of suffering.

 

Note: I have put " origin " in quotes as a hint

that it is a double entendre: origin in a

*spatial* sense of the origin for a coordinate

system, and origin in a chronological sense

of " beginning " . And I am suggesting that both

space and time spring from this " origin " .

 

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...