Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 There is a lot of nonsense in the world that one could talk about, Werner. Why is Werner so *vexed* with this particular, rather benign form of " babble " ? That seems the relevant question at hand. Bill Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Love babbling: > > All you need is Love, > Love counts, > God is Love, > Love is all there is, > Love, and everything is ok, > ... > etc, etc, etc > > Werner > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@g...> > wrote: > > > > > Self-knowledge is not this endless Love-babbling, not this > spiritual > > > soaring into blissfull heavens, it is not this constant stupid > > > repeating that I am God, it is not the sermons of an inflated ego > > > through poetry. > > > > > > Werner > > > > >>> > > > > When you say, " Self-knowledge is not this endless Love-babbling..., " > > what do you mean by " *this* Love-babbling... " ? You seem to have > > something particular in mind. How can I evaluate your statement > > when I don't know what you are referring to? > > > > In other words, one could characterize your statement as > > " subjective " since you assume we all know what you are > > thinking when you say that. Would you agree? > > > > And, if what you are saying is subjective, then how is it > > so distinct from whatever Love-babbling you are talking > > about? > > > > There may be others that experience life in a very different > > way than you. And if so, then it is reasonable to suppose > > that they might express in ways very different from you. > > It is hard to be sure, since I don't know what Love-babbling > > you are talking about, but perhaps you simply don't know > > the " code " to get the real message from what you are calling > > Love-babble. > > > > > > Bill > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Sorry Bill, It is you who is vexed with this kind of benign babble. My topic was self-knowledge which I touched in my post " Cogito ergo sum " . That you have fixed your complete attention on my mentioning of Love-babble is you hobby or fixation or hang-up or what ever the reason may be. Werner Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@g...> wrote: > > There is a lot of nonsense in the world that > one could talk about, Werner. > > Why is Werner so *vexed* with this particular, > rather benign form of " babble " ? That seems > the relevant question at hand. > > Bill > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > > > Love babbling: > > > > All you need is Love, > > Love counts, > > God is Love, > > Love is all there is, > > Love, and everything is ok, > > ... > > etc, etc, etc > > > > Werner > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@g...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Self-knowledge is not this endless Love-babbling, not this > > spiritual > > > > soaring into blissfull heavens, it is not this constant stupid > > > > repeating that I am God, it is not the sermons of an inflated ego > > > > through poetry. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > When you say, " Self-knowledge is not this endless Love- babbling..., " > > > what do you mean by " *this* Love-babbling... " ? You seem to have > > > something particular in mind. How can I evaluate your statement > > > when I don't know what you are referring to? > > > > > > In other words, one could characterize your statement as > > > " subjective " since you assume we all know what you are > > > thinking when you say that. Would you agree? > > > > > > And, if what you are saying is subjective, then how is it > > > so distinct from whatever Love-babbling you are talking > > > about? > > > > > > There may be others that experience life in a very different > > > way than you. And if so, then it is reasonable to suppose > > > that they might express in ways very different from you. > > > It is hard to be sure, since I don't know what Love-babbling > > > you are talking about, but perhaps you simply don't know > > > the " code " to get the real message from what you are calling > > > Love-babble. > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Sorry Werner, not vexed at all. And if the shoe doesn't fit, well then, why a point to make about it? It sounded to me like you were annoyed by all the Love-babble suffusing the airwaves. So I brought that impression to you for your consideration. If the impression I had was inaccurate, so be it. Just a comment Werner. Bill Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> wrote: > > Sorry Bill, > > It is you who is vexed with this kind of benign babble. > > My topic was self-knowledge which I touched in my post " Cogito ergo > sum " . That you have fixed your complete attention on my mentioning of > Love-babble is you hobby or fixation or hang-up or what ever the > reason may be. > > Werner > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@g...> > wrote: > > > > There is a lot of nonsense in the world that > > one could talk about, Werner. > > > > Why is Werner so *vexed* with this particular, > > rather benign form of " babble " ? That seems > > the relevant question at hand. > > > > Bill > > > > Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr@p...> > wrote: > > > > > > Love babbling: > > > > > > All you need is Love, > > > Love counts, > > > God is Love, > > > Love is all there is, > > > Love, and everything is ok, > > > ... > > > etc, etc, etc > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@g...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Self-knowledge is not this endless Love-babbling, not this > > > spiritual > > > > > soaring into blissfull heavens, it is not this constant > stupid > > > > > repeating that I am God, it is not the sermons of an inflated > ego > > > > > through poetry. > > > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > When you say, " Self-knowledge is not this endless Love- > babbling..., " > > > > what do you mean by " *this* Love-babbling... " ? You seem to have > > > > something particular in mind. How can I evaluate your statement > > > > when I don't know what you are referring to? > > > > > > > > In other words, one could characterize your statement as > > > > " subjective " since you assume we all know what you are > > > > thinking when you say that. Would you agree? > > > > > > > > And, if what you are saying is subjective, then how is it > > > > so distinct from whatever Love-babbling you are talking > > > > about? > > > > > > > > There may be others that experience life in a very different > > > > way than you. And if so, then it is reasonable to suppose > > > > that they might express in ways very different from you. > > > > It is hard to be sure, since I don't know what Love-babbling > > > > you are talking about, but perhaps you simply don't know > > > > the " code " to get the real message from what you are calling > > > > Love-babble. > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Share Posted January 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@g...> wrote: > >Sorry Werner, not vexed at all. > >And if the shoe doesn't fit, well then, >why a point to make about it? >It sounded to me like you were annoyed by >all the Love-babble suffusing the airwaves. >So I brought that impression to you for >your consideration. If the impression I >had was inaccurate, so be it. Just a >comment Werner. Hi Bill, I guess you will never come to know truly if your impression was inaccurate or not. In the meanwhile you could ponder about the question in which way your impressions do affect your reactions... :-)) Stefan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.