Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 Thought is violence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 In a message dated 3/5/2006 6:45:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, lastrain writes: > Again, violence is simply resistance to > >What Is. Nothing more, nothing less. > > > > > >Bill L.E: Resistence is simply resistance to >What Is. Nothing more, nothing less. Why call it violence? Larry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 Love is violence, it destroys everything that is unlike itself..in the act of breathing... Ana > > > > Thought is violence. > ** > > If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your > subscription, sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups: > > /mygroups?edit=1 > > Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta > group and click on Save Changes. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > > > Thought is violence. > Not sure what you mean by " thought " . *Thinking* is not inherently violent. Contemplating a software problem is thinking in some sense of the term. But such contemplation can be free and open, unattached to outcome, and unburdened by any *particular thought*. Such contemplation is like a stream flowing, with destination unknown, and with its passage being fleet, and light. Again, violence is simply resistance to What Is. Nothing more, nothing less. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is violence. > > > > Not sure what you mean by " thought " . > *Thinking* is not inherently violent. > Contemplating a software problem is > thinking in some sense of the term. > But such contemplation can be free and > open, unattached to outcome, and unburdened > by any *particular thought*. Such contemplation > is like a stream flowing, with destination > unknown, and with its passage being fleet, > and light. > > Again, violence is simply resistance to > What Is. Nothing more, nothing less. > > > Bill > The one thinking has been conceptually carved and maintained.out of what is. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2006 Report Share Posted March 5, 2006 In a message dated 3/5/2006 3:09:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, lissbon2002 writes: > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain > wrote: > > >Thought is violence. > > > Pretty often. > > Len Sometimes. Larry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > > > > > Thought is violence. Pretty often. Len Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 In a message dated 3/5/2006 5:34:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 08:00:46 -0000 " toombaru2006 " <lastrain Thought Thought is violence. Stop that!.........Pass me a scone, will ya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought is violence. > > > > > > > Not sure what you mean by " thought " . > > *Thinking* is not inherently violent. > > Contemplating a software problem is > > thinking in some sense of the term. > > But such contemplation can be free and > > open, unattached to outcome, and unburdened > > by any *particular thought*. Such contemplation > > is like a stream flowing, with destination > > unknown, and with its passage being fleet, > > and light. > > > > Again, violence is simply resistance to > > What Is. Nothing more, nothing less. > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > The one thinking has been conceptually carved and maintained.out of what is. > > > > toombaru > Then that is not the What Is I am talking about. Nothing is *maintained* in What Is. And the " thinking " I spoke of has no thinker. It is just as " writing " , that can happen without a " writer " . Or wind that can blow without a " blower " . But to one for whom everything that happens have a *doer*, this will all be senseless, meaningless, incorrect. Well, it cannot be helped. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.